What worries me most is because there is no way to prove the negative value of these agentic scams and because swe teams are (sadly) compressible to some extent, some companies will simply let go 10% of their workforce while the remaining 90% will have no choice but to keep grudging with the additional “benefit” of having to show the positive value of this scam to their hierarchy (unless they want to apply to the 10%). So much waste and sadness all around.

Anyone who has ever used an IBM product will keep this as far away from their code as possible.

Maybe they can also create agents to replace the “business analysis” where they check and define business logic requirements.

I need to say that I'm very impressed with the PDL project, a lot of things can be done in there.

https://github.com/IBM/prompt-declaration-language

What's up with the amateur hour graphs with squashed/pixelated logos?

I said this before I left IBM, and I will say it again.

These and other models IBM is working on can do basic tasks that anyone else could. But it will all fall apart the moment you add complexity to it.

It's hilarious to see how IBM struggles to stay relevant, what did that lead to? A bot that summarizes stack trace. Why is this even on the front page of HN?

The video is really sad. No music, no sounds. I remember better videos on youtube in 2006.

Beep beep!

[dead]

Can it debug RPG? /s