I love the literate way you have explained your thought process in the readme.
> Everyone defines these, so why not provide them?
Honestly, that's fair.
Okay then.
I was hoping to see a “this is just for fun” disclaimer but didn’t see one. Please never actually use this in a project that other people will have to read or contribute to.
seems like its obvious to me that its a joke
> And it’s backwards-compatible with C and all of its libraries!
I can't wait to give it a shot! This looks like a riot.
It's exactly why I find python code difficult - nay impossible - to read at times.
So you are really doing absolutely the opposite of what you are claiming...
Obviously beauty is in the eye of the beholder - but the one thing that C got right was using "{" & "}" to specify code flow.
I give up.