I went to a high school that hard very hard time offering advanced level courses. But they argued, successfully, that gifted students were just the other side of the 'special needs' spectrum and had the same right to resources as students who needed extra help. They got the funding and the advanced courses were a success and continue to this day. They also managed to keep the bar high - i.e. they kept it hard and many students who initially signed up would drop down to regular levels after a few weeks.
rahimnathwani 1 day ago||
Posts #9, #10 and #11 here are about the final (adopted) version of the framework:
This kind of disclaimer should be kept in mind for all media sources, perhaps especially those whose political leanings aren't spelled out explicitly on their About page [0].
... Are the biases of Reason not familiar to the HN crowd? It doesn't seem like disclaimers like this are treated as necessary for most other partisan publications.
If you're aware of facts that undermine the argument being made here, or have good reason (heh) as to why their argument is not well supported in this case, it would be better to present those things explicitly.