Posted by hricha_shandily 10/28/2024
I think that tries to say that if Plausible generates graphs of 1000 pageviews, GA's graphs are based on 556 of the 1000, and that this makes GA's graphs half as accurate.
Say again? Basing graphs on a sample of half the users doesn't reduce accuracy very much in my experience (which is old). The per-day graphs and reports I generated looked very much like their per-week equivalent, despite being based on 15% of the data.
There's more blah, about how GA is late for example. I didn't really notice any difference between yesterday's data and that from a few days ago. Who cares about such details, really.
Some sentences I didn't notice in the article: "This lack of accuracy is a problem in practice, because …" or "Plausible detects problems with your funnels that GA4 doesn't, because …" or anything like that. They just brag about accuracy and promptness, without any argument that the accuracy or promptness makes a difference.
Sigh.
On a random sample - shouldn't reduce it too much. On a sample with the selection biased in almost every category - it's going to be entirely different data as a result.
Yes it does. Both for the adblock https://backlinko.com/ad-blockers-users and the consent banner https://www.advance-metrics.com/en/blog/cookie-behaviour-stu...
Take the top graph on the first page: countries. I've worked at two places where I had insight into web access and logs and such. I shouldn't go into too much detail so I'll pick a different pair of neighbour countries: if France and Germany were target markets, the difference in ad blocker usage would not change any decisions. Germany has a higher share ad blockers, and because of that a graph comparing the two countries might be 3% away from reality, but 3% wouldn't affect any decision. 3% difference in flows of money might, but 3% on something that doesn't reflect money? Not a chance.
Further, I suspect that because they're similar in many other ways, they're also similar on that graph. It's not just a coincidence.
I believe it.
> and will prevent your site from loading slow.
I don't! :)
That should be the claim.