Top
Best
New

Posted by belter 10/28/2024

Philadelphia prosecutor sues Elon Musk group to stop $1M lottery for voters(www.reuters.com)
9 points | 4 comments
jfengel 10/29/2024|
Ordinarily, I kinda ignore the fact that rich people get away with stuff that poor people can't. It's not fair, but much of the time, the scope is sort of limited.

To be more blunt: it usually doesn't affect me directly. Or if it does, it does only in a diffuse kind of way. I don't love it, but I can't get myself too exercised about it. The effort to reward ratio of trying to fix it seems too high.

But election law forces me to notice. If he gets away with buying an election, there is a very direct and personal impact. And "getting away with it" includes being able to buy his way out with a fine -- even a fine that would utterly destroy me.

Which means that it crosses that bar -- it justifies a lot of effort to try to fix it. And a vast amount of effort is going to be required.

themaninthedark 10/28/2024||
I'm kind of confused here. The article says that the giveaway is for signing a petition saying you support free speech and gun rights.

The legal argument is that it is illegal to buy votes or pay for someone to register to vote...but signing a petition is not voting and the article says the petition is only open to registered voters.

belter 10/28/2024|
https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/egpbjmwkkpq/...

The case has wisely been set as a state law enforcement matter rather than a federal election law case. This strengthens their position by keeping it focused on clear state statutory violations of Pennsylvania law. The law is very clear that unauthorized lotteries are illegal.

themaninthedark 10/28/2024||
Ok, I know some states have rather strict sweepstakes and lottery laws. Why the article goes on to talk about other federal laws rather then show that the case is solely built on state law is kinda confusing...