Top
Best
New

Posted by shortformblog 3/29/2025

Why Apple's Severance gets edited over remote desktop software(tedium.co)
573 points | 342 commentspage 4
kittikitti 3/29/2025||
I do this all the time and get laughed at. I try to explain the exact same reasons but no one pays attention. I guess I just needed the Big Tech gatekeepers to tell the sheep that it works. Among sheep, it's not about the message but the messenger.
brcmthrowaway 3/29/2025||
The real question is why arent they using Final Cut Pro? And does the composer using Logic?
a-dub 3/29/2025||
it's pretty standard these days i think. i remember aws having some hyperlocal low latency POPs with graphics capabilities for this specific purpose.

i think there have also been a handful of purpose built remote desktop packages that were purpose built.

hk1337 3/30/2025||
I kind of think the 80TB of video files might have contributed to that? Maybe it was easier to use the jump desktop to do it on another computer than it would have been to copy and pass around the video files?
medos 3/29/2025||
Couldn't the traffic be LAN? Everyone keeps mentioning 'over the internet' - the device they're doing the editing on could be in a different room in the same building over gigabit++ speeds.
int0x29 3/29/2025|
There is very little good reason to have this setup if you are in the same building as it.
overvale 3/29/2025|||
The reason is to never allow anyone (even the editors) to have actual access to the show's files/images. Remote software can prohibit copy/paste, file transfers, and screenshots. I worked in a post facility with 100s of people all remoting in to a server rack down the hall.
bongodongobob 3/29/2025|||
What? On prem multi user remote desktop servers used by on prem users are extremely common.
m3kw9 3/29/2025||
Nope cloud and local processing is always gonna be 2 things and not one will replace the other. Cloud has been around, and if you look at games nobody wants to play their game thru a service like Stadia.
kevinsync 3/29/2025|
Ultimately / objectively I agree, but subjectively I'm not so sure -- I recently gave NVIDIA GeForce NOW a whirl (cloud gaming, $19.99/month (cheaper prepaid) for an 'Ultimate' account which instantly connects you to an RTX 4080 VM + HDR + max 240fps) and it just works. Super smooth, realtime gameplay at max graphics.

I wanted to test it out given that my son was looking to upgrade his PC and not only are component costs through the roof, there's barely any inventory to be had if you were trying to buy exactly what you want! (thanks, resellers...)

It's not a perfect setup obviously -- really only ideal for AAA games with cloud saves, no mods, etc (Cyberpunk 2077, that kind of thing), and I won't make the argument that it's ultimately better than local for gaming (it's not), but I will say that in my experience, the hardware-rendered framerates are through the roof, it streams seamlessly at high resolution, and I could see envision a scenario where video editing on an appropriate VM should be virtually indistinguishable from local.

Just food for thought!

486sx33 3/29/2025||
I’m not convinced they were ever trying to say a Mac mini could create a production film on its own. This isn’t how post production works…
eddieroger 3/29/2025||
Saving a click and a lot of editorializing:

* More powerful machines centrally located

* COVID-19 practices make lots of people in one place undesirable

* It's easy for rogue editors to steal stuff, and this prevents that

curiousgal 3/29/2025|
We've had this setup in the investment bank where I work for a couple of years now, Citrix though.
TZubiri 3/29/2025|
Looks good, don't see the drawback for this usecase

"These editors aren't working on Macs, per se. They're working around them. Sure, there's an Apple logo in the top-left corner (two, actually), but it feels superfluous, knowing that the software isn’t directly on the machine and it just as easily be running on a Windows or Linux box a thousand miles away"

But the source AND target of the remote connections are both macs, pretty straightforward

leshenka 3/29/2025|
the point they make is that if you're using a remote desktop program to remotely edit videos you don't need a mac on the client side.

what would have been a far better PR is if Final Cut offered enterprise solution with "server" part that holds videos and does the heavy lifting and "client" part that works with miniatures doesn't let you export anything to disk and all that

TZubiri 3/31/2025||
So the criticism is that Apple isn't vendor locking and offers compatibility between OS? Not something I would expect to see on HN
leshenka 4/1/2025||
I'm not advocating for vendor locking, it's not what I said. I said if they wanted to advertise macs for enterprise video editing they should have implemented this in FCP natively.

This however wouldn't be vendor locking because remoting would still be an option.

Instead they've shown that remote desktop is the most reliable way to do this kind of job because there isn't anything better.

More comments...