Top
Best
New

Posted by baud147258 4/4/2025

Kerosene did not save the sperm whale (2024)(edconway.substack.com)
190 points | 69 commentspage 2
dr_dshiv 4/4/2025|
What are other counterintuitive stories like this? (Regardless of veracity)

* Kerosene saves the whales

* Plastics saves the elephants

* Coal saved the forests

Other similar stories?

solace_silence 4/5/2025|
Access to information will cure ignorance.
scop 4/4/2025||
Obligatory comment: Moby Dick is a work of stunning glory and if you think you can abridge it you are missing the entire point.
wizzwizz4 4/4/2025|
Bored man watches sad man fight large white man. The survivors leave.
wizzwizz4 4/4/2025||
An amputee gets closure, we hope.
wizzwizz4 4/4/2025||
In Anger: a theologically-confused tale of nominative determinism.
wizzwizz4 4/5/2025||
Once upon a time, I ran out of money and was feeling kinda suicidal, so I thought, hey, why not take up whaling? and oh man, the captain. Where to begin? His white whale was an actual white whale. Not a beluga: I mean a sperm whale, horrifyingly white, and bigger than any other! And he had the most interesting conversations when he thought I wasn't listening… Anyway, I spent much of the voyage giving my religious opinions to anyone who'd listen. (I also have opinions about vegetarianism! And whiteness!) Alas, each who listened has drowned himself. Or was it God who drowned them? I have opinions on that, too!
aaron695 4/4/2025||
[dead]
TheBlight 4/4/2025|
For the same reason solar panels aren't going to stop people from drilling and sucking up every last drop of oil.
MisterTea 4/4/2025||
I am surprised everyone replying is solely thinking about energy when we need oil for lubricants and plastics and so on. Things we cant replace easily with organic alternatives which themselves might have environmental impacts (e.g. land and water for growing oil producing crops.)
lazide 4/4/2025||
It’s relatively trivial (but more expensive than getting it straight from the ground) to synthesize oil from atmospheric components + energy. Some countries have done it at large scales during wartime.
salynchnew 4/4/2025|||
This is the issue. A lot of hydocarbons can still be produced without extracting them from rocks miles under the ground, poisoning the water supply, or any of the externalities of runaway global warming.

The trick is leveraging insanely cheap solar electricity to do everything else.

jabl 4/5/2025||||
Which countries would that be? Capturing CO2 from the atmosphere in order to have a source of carbon is, to this day, a technology in the prototype stage.

If you're thinking of Germany during WWII, or South Africa during apartheid, they produced synthetic liquid fuels from coal. That was technology that worked, though it was very expensive. And of course CO2 emissions were much higher than using petroleum.

AngryData 4/5/2025|||
The chemistry isn't that hard to produce oil from basically nothing of value, but the energy costs aren't trivial, and that means we don't need a 1:1 energy replacement from fossil fuel sources to solar panels, we need more like a 10x increase in global energy production to replace fossil fuels with solar for example.

The only really feasible way to produce that much electricity renewably by this point in time or even within the next 20+ years has been nuclear energy, which the world largely turned their backs on the last few decades and left us in an even bigger hole to fill.

hinkley 4/4/2025|||
Right now the amount of energy it takes to extract every gallon of oil from the ground is creeping up decade by decade. So you end up having to consume your own supply to make it fit for consumers.

I can see a day where solar powered refineries exist. Either under their own power or by being grid-tied.

But there will come a time when it’s just too expensive to pull it up from many places and we end up with dozens of wells and optimize cracking for petrochemicals other than fuel.

SV_BubbleTime 4/4/2025|||
The people that have that line of thinking have no idea how things are actually made.

We might no burn every drop of oil. But we’re going to use it until it’s gone.

“Oh maybe we won’t need the most dense and easily convertible source of hydrocarbons on our planet!”

alt227 4/4/2025||
What, that they are intermittant, dont work for over 50% of the time, and cant handle the immediate peaks required on a national/international grid?
os2warpman 4/4/2025|||
If you look at it from a systems perspective, battery storage is the same as increasing/decreasing steam output or drawing from a steam bank to match demand and the diurnal nature of solar is the same as taking units offline for maintenance.

The durations, scale, and reaction times to changing conditions are different (sometimes worse, sometimes better) but the concept is the same.

We solved those problems before, and have already solved them with solar it's just a matter of building out the infrastructure.

We may have to shed a single digit percentage of "market efficiency" in the short term to ensure the future of humanity, though, so there is resistance.

alt227 4/4/2025||
You are correct. we have indeed solved some of these issues, we have even built incredible solutions such as Electric Mountain in Wales[0] to store and release incredible amounts of energy almost immediately. However this just serves to prove my point. Even an entire lake being flushed down a mountain is not enough to offset all the peaaks in just the UK, a relatively small country. To solve this issue on a global scale enough to provide the worlds power from solar is an unthinkable challenge IMO.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinorwig_Power_Station

jessekv 4/4/2025||
To be fair UK has the unique problem where everyone starts their electric tea kettle all at the same time...

Makes me wonder if you can smooth out certain peaks by introducing individualised random delays in the television programming ;)

pbhjpbhj 4/4/2025||
We've effectively done that with streaming on-demand programming and local storage allowing pausing of OTA programming.

Also, Octopus Energy is now the UKs largest provider, they have tariffs with variable rates (demand-based pricing). Very occasionally you can be paid to use electricity. That's certainly encourages some users away from boiling the kettle at peak times.

IshKebab 4/4/2025||||
I think he was alluding to plastic.
zeristor 4/4/2025|||
That’s what grid battery storage is for, obviously.
alt227 4/4/2025||
Yeah, except a battery to hold enough energy to cover the entire planets energy spikes would be some battery.
pbhjpbhj 4/4/2025||
See, what you do is charge up the atmosphere as a 'battery' (capacitor).

/Tesla

Non-chemical batteries, flywheels and hydroelectric storage green hydrogen and such other ways of storing energy as we can come up with are certainly part of the solution.