I'm guessing that's because "talking out of one's ass" [1] applies to current version of this technology more than the others?

1. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/talk_out_of_one%27s_ass

This is flagged and I kinda get it, but this a genuinely correct observation.

Wow that Brazilian institute... surely they knew?

> Another factor is how these logos are created. Important corporate decisions involve many stakeholders. The result is often the safest, most inoffensive option, the average of everyone's opinions. In design meetings at AI companies, conversations probably sound like:

> ...

> No single person suggests making a logo that resembles an anus, but when everyone's feedback gets incorporated, that's what often emerges. Risk aversion in corporate environments naturally pushes designs toward familiar, "safe" territory, which apparently means anatomical openings.

There's hope! If you're a stakeholder in a logo design meeting, be sure point out the circular proposals look like anuses.

Also I hate all those "bold, sans-seif" logos. What they hell are they thinking? Those companies should just all change their name to "Company," too.

I think they look more like eyes or portals. I guess you see what's on your mind.

Like the Greendale Flag

Claude wins this competition too.

please put funding here?

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder?

what can be seen now, can not be made unseen after! I never thought about this.. I already guessed myself, why there's a planet called Uranus, but no Myanus. This is cleary a systematic naming fraud. And now also the systematic visual-polution fraud with logos :)