Top
Best
New

Posted by jamesxv7 16 hours ago

Ask HN: What's the 2025 stack for a self-hosted photo library with local AI?

First of all, this is purely a personal learning project for me, aiming to combine three of my passions: photography, software engineering, and my family memories. I have a large collection of family photos and want to build an interactive experience to explore them, ala Google or Apple Photo features.

My goal is to create a system with smart search capabilities, and one of the most important requirements is that it must run entirely on my local hardware. Privacy is key, but the main driver is the challenge and joy of building it myself (an obviously learn).

The key features I'm aiming for are:

Automatic identification and tagging of family members (local face recognition).

Generation of descriptive captions for each photo.

Natural language search (e.g., "Show me photos of us at the beach in Luquillo from last summer").

I've already prompted AI tools for a high-level project plan, and they provided a solid blueprint (eg, Ollama with LLaVA, a vector DB like ChromaDB, you know it). Now, I'm highly interested in the real-world human experience. I'm looking for advice, learning stories, and the little details that only come from building something similar.

What tools, models, and best practices would you recommend for a project like this in 2025? Specifically, I'm curious about combining structured metadata (EXIF), face recognition data, and semantic vector search into a single, cohesive application.

Any and all advice would be deeply appreciated. Thanks!

194 points | 93 comments
crobibero 16 hours ago|
I think Immich checks a lot of these

https://immich.app/

sircastor 15 hours ago||
Immich is what I'm using right now. I'm running it in a Docker container on my Synology. It was very advantageous to spin up another docker container on my laptop to do the face recognition work because the Synology was going to take forever on it.

We no longer are auto uploading to Google or Apple.

So far, I really like it. I haven't quite gone 100%, as we're still uploading with Synology's photo app, but Immich provides a much more refined, featured interface.

darknavi 14 hours ago|||
If you want a solid "just upload the photos" experience, PhotoSync on iOS is really great.

I think you can use Immich to just look at a folder and not use the backup from phone bits.

xiconfjs 4 hours ago||
ACK. The best part is the one-time-pay option to unlock background sync with many different triggers which can be combined - mine 03:00 am with charger connected in my WLAN. Love the software.
old-gregg 12 hours ago||||
May I ask: why not use Synology's own photo stack? The web UI is pretty good, the iPhone app is great, it runs locally without depending on Synology servers, and does have face recognition and all other features.
sircastor 9 hours ago|||
I didn’t want to be attached to the Synology system or hardware anymore. Synology Photos is great (and we’re still using it for the upload atm), but Immich lets me control the whole thing, top to bottom.

I’m running a DS1813+. It’s stopped getting new feature updates. This approach lets me keep the storage running while migrating away the server components.

graealex 1 hour ago||||
To avoid the same debacle that already happened once with Video Station?
itsdrewmiller 11 hours ago|||
Have you tried Immich? It is extremely polished and has every feature you mentioned, along with being open source with tons of community energy and no lock in.
noncoml 15 hours ago|||
> We no longer are auto uploading to Google or Apple.

May I ask why? Just curious as the main reason I use Immich is for the auto upload

Edit: Ugh. Can’t read. I somehow read don’t auto upload to Immich.

adezxc 15 hours ago|||
because you don't want your data being held by Google or Apple?
import 14 hours ago|||
Self hosting and owning your own data
sz4kerto 16 hours ago|||
This. It's a fascinating project, it is hard to believe how can an FLOSS project be so high quality. In my book it's on the level of Postgres (although it's a smaller project, probably).
denysvitali 16 hours ago|||
Their frontend is amazing, their apps are not as performant, and the backend is (IMHO) the worst of them all.

No hate here, I'm really grateful for what they've achieved so far, but I think there's a lot of room for improvement (e.g: proper R/W query split, native S3 integration, faster endpoints, ...). I already mentioned it in their channel (they're a really welcoming community!) and I'm working on an alternative drop-in replacement backend (written in Go) [1] that will hopefully bring all the needed improvements.

TL;DR: It's definitely good, especially for an open-source project, and the team is very dedicated - but it's definitely not Postgres-good

[1]: https://github.com/denysvitali/immich-go-backend

darkwater 15 hours ago||
Why the focus on S3 for a self-hosted app? Anyway kudos for the effort, I'm not experiencing performance issues in my locally self-hosted Immich installation but more performant software is always welcome.
toomuchtodo 11 hours ago|||
S3 compatible means one can point it at any storage that talks S3, which is a lot more flexible than POSIX or NFS.
rkagerer 14 hours ago||||
I'm wondering the same thing. He had me until he said "S3".
bargainbin 14 hours ago||
Likely means S3 compatibility so it can be used with anything, be it a cloud provider or a locally hosted solution like minio
denysvitali 13 hours ago||
S3-compatible storage. In my case, Backblaze B2. The idea is to make the backend compatible with rclone, so that one can pick whatever storage they want (including B2 / S3 and others)
darkwater 1 hour ago||
I backup my immich photos in B2 with rclone but I prefer having it as a separate process (also, the backup is append-only). I don't need "hyperscale", and storing directly on S3/B2/remotely breaks a bit the 3-2-1 rule I want to follow.
jasonjayr 12 hours ago|||
I have and love my self-hosted immich install. If self-hosted could also use S3 storage, that allows me to use Garage (https://git.deuxfleurs.fr/Deuxfleurs/garage) , which also lets me play games with growable/redundant storage on a pile of second-hand hard drives. IIRC it can only use a mounted block device at the moment, (unless there is a nfs-exposed s3 translator ....)

A lot of existing tooling supports the s3 protocol, so it would simplify the storage picture (no pun intended).

esseph 15 hours ago|||
Looking at the world around me, so much of it is driven by open source. In fact, I can't name a single piece of electronics around me that isn't using it.
weird-eye-issue 10 hours ago||
Most tend to be backend only or much lower level. Open source projects with complex UIs and mobile apps is pretty rare I think
esseph 10 hours ago||
I would find that argument plausible if the comment I replied to didn't mention Postgres as the bar.
weird-eye-issue 7 hours ago||
Again, Postgres is lower level software
esseph 4 hours ago||
Apologies, misread.
lucideer 15 hours ago|||
Been running immich on my home server for about a year now.

Near zero maintenance stack, incredibly easy to update, the client mobile apps even notify you (unobtrusively) when your server has an update available. The UI is just so polished & features so stable it's hard to believe it's open source.

hammyhavoc 3 hours ago||
This seems in stark contrast to others complaining enough about breaking updates that I haven't bothered to try it until it is deemed "stable".

Is it really that stable and flawless in terms of updates?

Because I'm sat here with ZFS, snapshotting and replication configured and wondering why people scare others off of it when the tools to mitigate issues are all free and should be used anyway as part of a bog-standard self-hosted stack.

nradk 9 hours ago||
Been running Immich for a couple years now and it has been awesome. There are a few rough edges but I’m sure most of them will be smoothed out by the first stable release.
magicalhippo 9 hours ago||
Haven't had great results with the AI portion though, even with the recommended model. Embeddings seem really poor, and has lots of misses and false positives.

Given how good the new multimodal models are, I've been thinking it would be much better to just have a multimodal model describe the image, and let the searching be done by the already included melleisearch.

That said, due to reasons I haven't had time to mess with it past couple of months, so perhaps something drastic has changed.

iforgotpassword 15 hours ago||
I currently use photoprism, but it's moving rather slowly. Facial recognition misses a lot of faces, the automatic clustering works fine at first but once you tagged a few thousand faces the implementation grinds to a halt and the background worker runs for hours pegging single cpu core.

The dev is really reluctant of accepting external contributions, which has driven away a lot of curious folks willing to contribute.

Immich seems to be the other extreme. Moving really fast with a lot of contributors, but stuff occasionally breaks, the setup is fiddly, but the Ai features are 100x more powerful. I just don't like the ui as much as photoprism. I with there was some kind of blend of the two, on a middle ground of their dev philosophies.

darkwater 15 hours ago|
While Immich development release versions every 2-3 weeks on average, and a breaking one every 4-6 months, they are approaching the stable release, so the pace should also down a bit. The setup to be honest is pretty standard IMO.
mossTechnician 16 hours ago||
This may not interest you, but Ente checks most of these boxes for me. It has face recognition and AI-based object search out of the box, and you can self-host their open-source server without any restrictions. The models they used might be useful for your project.
jamesxv7 11 hours ago||
Ente is a tremendous proposal. I don't know why I hadn't heard of it before, but I don't think it meets what I'm looking for. But the fact that the software is completely open is impressive.
fwn 55 minutes ago||
I currently use Ente.io as a secondary photo syncing service in addition to Google Photos.

While I really like it — snappy and encrypted — I was surprised by how much the missing Ultra HDR implementation affects me. Photos are currently uploaded with brightness information but not displayed with it. Therefore, my photos look great in Google Photos but far less vivid in Ente.

For what it's worth, I found a discussion about Ultra HDR. It doesn't seem to be a priority right now, though: https://github.com/ente-io/ente/discussions/779

barbazoo 16 hours ago|||
Their pricing page doesn't say anything as far as I can find but do you still pay pay Ente if you self host the server as well as the photos ("S3-compatible object storage")?
marcusb 15 hours ago|||
> do you still pay pay Ente if you self host the server as well as the photos ("S3-compatible object storage")?

No. (I self-host Ente and use their published ios app.)

akho 15 hours ago||
The Ente self-hosting proposition seems strange. Why would I want to e2e encrypt my photos that I self-host? Sounds like it will only make life more difficult.
mossTechnician 15 hours ago|||
1. "Self-hosted" doesn't always mean "on your own hardware." Some people rent VPSes. This helps keep their data safe.

2. The software is provided without modification; I think it would be stranger to remove the encryption.

idatum 12 hours ago||
> Some people rent VPSes. This helps keep their data safe.

This is exactly how I self-host Ente and it has been great.

Machine leaning for image detection has worked really well for me, especially facial recognition for family members (easy to find that photo to share).

I have the client on my Android mobile, Fire tablet (via F-Droid), and my Windows laptop.

My initial motivation was to replace "cloud" storage for getting photos copied off the phone as soon as possible.

freehorse 10 hours ago||||
Because you want to access your photos remotely, or give access to more people to certain albums. If the point is to just store them locally and no remote access is needed, a hard drive would probably be enough.
prophesi 7 hours ago||||
If there's a server involved, there's no reason not to have sensitive files and information end-to-end encrypted, whether self-hosting or not.
ibizaman 11 hours ago||||
You may want to self-host for your family or close friends while guaranteeing them privacy.
zzyzxd 8 hours ago|||
e2ee makes it easier to sell their hosted version, and there's probably not enough incentive to justify the additional overhead of having an unencrypted option.

Also, my house is less secure than commercial data centers, so e2ee gives me greater peace of mind about data safety.

elevaet 7 hours ago||
I think a really valuable feature in a photo library app would be something that can identify sets of very similar or identical photos and decide which one is the "best" and offer to discard the rest.

I must be wasting so much storage on the 4 photos I took in a row of the family pose, or derivatives that got shared on whatsapp and then stored back to my gallery, and so on, and I know I'm not the only one.

lylo 2 hours ago|
Yeah. Lots of “culling” software out there but agree it would be a good feature for standard photo organisation apps

https://imagen-ai.com/

https://aftershoot.com/

coffeecoders 16 hours ago||
I have been building something like this but for personal use.

As of now, I use SentenceTransformer model to chunk files, blip for captioning (“Family vacation in Banff, February 2025”)) and mtcnn with InsightFace for face detection. My index stores captions, face embeddings, and EXIF metadata (date, GPS) for queries like “show photos of us in Banff last winter.” I’m working on integrating ChromaDB for faster searches.

Eventually, I aim to store indexes as:

{

  "filename": "/Vacation/Banff/Wife.jpg",

  "chunk_id": 0,

  "text": "Family at Banff, February 2025",

  "caption_embedding": [0.1, 0.2, ...],

  "face_embeddings": [{"name": "NT", "embedding": [0.3, 0.4, ...]}, ...],

  "exif": {
     
     "DateTimeOriginal": "2025:02:15",

     "GPSCoordinates": "18.387, -65.992"

    }
}

I also built an UI (like Spotlight Search) to search through these indexes.

Code (in progress): https://github.com/neberej/smart-search

nico 14 hours ago||
I don't know about the photo-management aspects. However, I've had very good experiences running gemma3 (4b and 12b) locally via ollama

I've used gemma to process pictures and get descriptions and also to respond questions about the pictures (eg. is there a bicycle in the picture?). Haven't tried it for face recognition, but if you already have identified someone in one photo, it can probably tell you if the person in that photo is also in another photo

Just one caveat, if you are processing thousands of pictures, it will take a while to process them all (depending on your hardware and picture size). You could also try creating a processing pipeline, first extracting faces or bounding boxes of the faces with something like opencv, and then passing those to gemma3

Please post repo link if you ever decide to open source

jamesxv7 14 hours ago|
Thanks nico for sharing your experience! That's really helpful. The idea of using OpenCV to create a processing pipeline for face detection before passing it to Gemma is brilliant I hadn't thought of that. I'll definitely look into using gemma with ollama.

And for sure, if I get this to a point where it's open-source, I'll post the link here!

nicoburns 14 hours ago||
It's not self-hosted, but https://ente.io/ is an independent commercial solution with E2E encrypted cloud storage and local AI (EDIT: apparently you can also self-host)
nathan_phoenix 14 hours ago|
You can, in fact, self host it.

https://help.ente.io/self-hosting/

mlunar 11 hours ago||
It's a pretty deep rabbit hole. For semantic search CLIP and cosine similarity are just fine. SmolVLM(2) mentioned by spacecadet looks interesting though. I haven't integrated face recognition myself, but [deepface] seemed pretty complete.

I focused more on fast rendering in [photofield] (quick [explainer] if you're interested), but even the hacked up basic semantic search with CLIP works better than it has any right to. Vector DBs are cool, but what is cooler is writing float arrays to sqlite :)

[deepface]: https://github.com/serengil/deepface

[photofield]: https://github.com/SmilyOrg/photofield

[explainer]: https://lnar.dev/blog/photofield-origins/

wooben 14 hours ago||
I've been running Nextcloud in Docker with the Recognize and Memories apps for about a year and half now. It's in an off-lease refurbished Dell Precision tower from 2018.

I'm using docker compose to include some supporting containers like go-vod (for hardware transcoding), another nextcloud instance to handle push notifications to the clients, and redis (for caching). I can share some more details, foibles and pitfalls if you'd like.

I initiated a rescan last week, which stacks background jobs in a queue that gets called by cron 2 or 3 times a day. Recognize has been cranking through 10k-20k photos per day, with good results.

I've installed a desktop client on my dad's laptop so he can dump all of the family hard drives we've accumulated over the years. The client does a good job of clearing up disk space after uploading, which is a huge advantage in my setup. My dad has used the OneDrive client before, so he was able to pick up this process very quickly.

Nextcloud also has a decent mobile client that can auto-upload photos and videos, which I recently used to help my mother-in-law upload media from her 7-year-old iPhone.

jan_tse 12 hours ago|
I run a pretty similar configuration on a pi 4 mounted to an external hard drive which I offload to other hard drives from time to time. The mobile app auto sync specific folders when my phone is connected at the home network. It's not flying performance wise but I mainly need a backup solution.

Gonna check the apps that you mentioned. Feel free to share more details of your set up. Why are you running 2 instances? Edit: I see, probably for the memories app.

wooben 9 hours ago||
Memories and Recognize work fine with the base Nextcloud docker image. My host has a GPU so I use go-vod to leverage hardware transcoding. The base NC docker image can't access Nvidia cards (probably other GPUs as well). I could script in a way to do this but would need to run it after each update. Recognize runs fine on my CPU so I haven't explored this yet.

I have an OpenMediaVault VM with a 10tb volume in the network that runs the S3 plugin (Minio-based) which is connected through Nextcloud's external storage feature (I want to migrate to Garage soon). I believe notify_push helps desktop clients cut down on the chatter when querying the external storage folder. Limiting the users that can access this also helps.

I was having issues getting the notify_push app [1] to work in the container with my reverse-proxy. I found some similar setups that did this [2], so I added another nextcloud container to the docker-compose yaml like so:

    notify_push:
    image: nextcloud
    restart: unless-stopped
    ports:
      - 7867:7867
    depends_on:
      - app
    environment:
      - PORT=7867
      - NEXTCLOUD_URL=http://<local ip address of docker server>:8081
    entrypoint: /var/www/html/custom_apps/notify_push/bin/x86_64/notify_push /var/www/html/config/config.php
    volumes:
      - /path/to/nextcloud/customapps:/var/www/html/custom_apps
      - /path/to/nextcloud/config:/var/www/html/config 
[1] - https://apps.nextcloud.com/apps/notify_push

[2] - https://help.nextcloud.com/t/docker-caddy-fpm-notify-push-ca...

indigodaddy 1 hour ago|||
Who's your host?
hammyhavoc 3 hours ago|||
Do you know if there's any way to `Recognize this image now` via the GUI? Whilst twiddling my thumbs for a few decades of photos to import, I go through what's there and occasionally a family member will point and tell me who a pic is of, but can't seem to immediately prioritise or `Recognize` the specific pic so I can add a name to the face.
ksec 8 hours ago|
Slightly Off Topic: I have always wanted (old) Apple to make Time Machine / Personal Cloud where Data is stored and processed in my property. While only offering Subscription based storage as long term storage Cloud backup and software update.

For Features. I dont know why there's isn't a tag for Screen Caps. I made lots of them and I want to group them together.

hammyhavoc 3 hours ago|
That sounds similar in concept to the original Apple TV (before the black puck one) that had a hard drive and basically ran Front Row (view your photos on your TV etc), but combined with the oldskool Apple Time Capsule.
More comments...