Top
Best
New

Posted by stubish 7/1/2025

Australians to face age checks from search engines(ia.acs.org.au)
139 points | 262 commentspage 2
Cartoxy 7/2/2025|
Aims to protect kids online, but it could easily go too far. It covers way more than just search engines—pretty much anything that returns info, including AI tools.

It pushes for heavy content filtering, age checks, and algorithm tweaks to hide certain results. That means more data tracking and less control over what users see. Plus, regulators can order stuff to be removed from search results, which edges into censorship. Sets the stage for broader control, surveillance, and over-moderation. slowburn additions all stack up. digital ID ,NBN monopoly ISP locked DNS servers . TR-069 etc etc. Hidden VOIP credentials. Australia is like the west's testing ground this kind of policy it seams.

shirro 7/2/2025||
This looks like a voluntary industry code of conduct made by US companies Microsoft, Google etc. I am not aware of any legislation that would require this in Australia. If the commissioner thinks the industry codes are insufficient she might advise the government that a legislative approach is required but she is not an Australian politician and was not elected by anyone here.

The eSafety commissioner is an American born ex-Microsoft, Adobe and Twitter employee who was appointed by the previous conservative government. I wouldn't be so sure her values are representative of the so-called Australian nanny state or the Australian Labor Party.

ratchetgo1 7/2/2025||
Grand Fascist State Censor Julie Inman Grant strikes again. Another disgraceful loss of privacy for the country defining anglophone technological totalitarianism.
tjmc 7/2/2025||
"eKaren" is shorter
ActorNightly 7/2/2025||
Meh, this is minor political fluff. Australia is still doing quite good.
Cartoxy 7/2/2025||
in the digital rights and government spying department --- maybe VS china or Nkorea but in the "west" we are profanely the worst. easily.
defrost 7/2/2025|||
You're asserting AU TLA's are outperforming the UK's GCHQ et al., the US's NSA and friends, the private company Palantir, Isreal's Unit 8200, etc?

Might want to wind back that Aussie Exceptionalism a notch or three. That or read up a little more.

account42 7/2/2025||||
Don't worry, the rest of the west is doing its best to catch up with you.
ActorNightly 7/3/2025|||
The thing that Australians don't realize is that like nobody cares that much about Australia. You are on that side of the world, pretty isolated as far as politics go.

Take the minor losses, be glad that conservative party didn't win, and watch the shitstorm in US and Europe from afar.

Sevrene 7/2/2025||
I’m an Australian who values privacy and civil liberties more than most I meet.

While I yearn for the more authentic and sincere days of the internet I grew up on, I recognize very quickly by visiting x or facebook how much it isn’t that, and hasn’t been for a long time.

I think this bill is a good thing and I support it.

hilbert42 7/2/2025||
"I’m an Australian who values privacy and civil liberties more than most I meet."

Same here. Early on, if I found a site interesting I'd often follow its links to other sites and so on down into places that the Establishment would deem unacceptable but I'd not worry too much about it.

Nowadays, I just assume authorities of all types are hovering over every mouse click I make. Not only is this horrible but it also robbs one of one's autonomy.

It won't be long before we're handing info that was once commonplace in textbooks around in secret.

SturgeonsLaw 7/2/2025|||
I’m an Australian who values privacy and civil liberties more than most I meet, and that's why I think this bill is horrible, is full of unintended consequences, and will be worked around by kids who care to do it.
florkbork 7/2/2025||
https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display....

Read the bill. Gov ID collection is just as much a violation as failing to take any action

fc417fc802 7/2/2025|||
Aren't privacy and civil liberties fundamentally at odds with centralized government issued ID checks? How can you claim to value the former while supporting a plan to require the latter?

In the days before electronics were endemic, physically checking a photo ID didn't run afoul of that as long as the person checking didn't record the serial number. But that's no longer the world we live in.

marcus_holmes 7/2/2025|||
I don't understand why you think this bill and that phenomenon (the fact that Xitter or Facebook aren't like the old days of the internet) are connected, can you explain why you think this, please?
Sevrene 7/3/2025||
Sure no worries, I can see why that's not immediately obvious to everyone.

I think people see laws and institutions encroaching on the internet as removing the 'wild west' aspect that existed on the internet in the early days. I have personally felt and have heard others express, a keen sense of nostalgia for that era. To many, more developed = less wild west.

People think of this legislation as increasing the complexity by going further away from that the more simple model. "Oh great, now I have to sign in to Google to view this" sort of thing.

I too get annoyed at small stuff like how you can't quote search all of google anymore. Things are more complex and just... different. Social media used to be a simple feed of people who you followed and not much else. The thing is, I believe the fact it's more big and complex, the fact it's the primary place many people interact- is actually why we need to legislate it.

marcus_holmes 7/4/2025||
Again, I agree with what you're saying, but fail to see how that is affected by this bill.

The bill isn't legislating against Meta, or Google, or any of the big tech companies that are making the internet a worse place. If anything, the bill entrenches their place in the whole system by using their logins to identify minors.

I see nothing in this bill that will encourage the internet to be friendlier, or more creative, or less enshittified, or in any way "better". What are you seeing that I'm not?

veeti 7/2/2025|||
Evidently the bar for valuing such things is set very low in Australia.
Sevrene 7/3/2025||
Lower than you would like, maybe. I am just a single person, it's my own opinion. Where are you from? Do you speak for your entire nation?
Nasrudith 7/2/2025|||
Are you sure you value privacy and civil liberties then if you fall for "Think of the Children" bollocks instead of wanting to throw politicians down wells to protect children from living in a dystopia?
g-b-r 7/2/2025|||
This is the account's first message here in two years
Sevrene 7/3/2025||
Yes, something like that.
theshackleford 7/2/2025|||
>I think this bill is a good thing and I support it.

Uhuh.

>I’m an Australian who values privacy and civil liberties more than most I meet.

No you're not.

Sevrene 7/3/2025||
Yes I am.
frollogaston 7/2/2025||
The AI-based version of this looks fine, the ID checks are odd though
Sevrene 7/3/2025||
I can agree with that
eidorb 7/2/2025||
Minor’s accounts must also revoke “sign out” functionality in case they see some titties.
HKH2 7/2/2025||
> However, users who are not logged in should also expect “default blurring of images of online pornography and high-impact violence material detected in search results”.
SoftTalker 7/2/2025||
To be fair, most of the concern is about stuff that's far more hard-core than "titties"
dbg31415 7/2/2025||
People need to realize that Australia is a testing ground for laws like this.

https://youtu.be/eW-OMR-iWOE

ggm 7/2/2025||
Homomorphic encryption and third parties. No need for government eyes to know axiomatically which 100pts ID verified which login, nor website or search engine to know who the real person is.

Most legislation aims to create the offence of misleading, not actually stamp out 100% of offenders. Kids who get round this will make liabilities for themselves and their parents.

azov 7/2/2025||
I wonder if technical complexity of implementing online age checks is about the same as implementing a robust direct democracy system - one where people can vote down bad laws instead of outsourcing those decisions wholesale to politicians they don’t even like?..
ggm 7/2/2025|
I predict Lower.

Unrelated, but why I don't agree:

The systems which permit voting down stupid laws also permit voting down good laws. This is very "be careful what you wish for" and reductive to "the voter is always right even when they want stupid things" interpretation of democracy.

E.g. Swiss cantons opposing votes for women inside the last 2 decades.

azov 7/2/2025|||
Well, direct democracy already exists in various forms (e.g., referendums, propositions on California ballots, etc.). Sometimes bad decisions are made, but I wouldn’t call it a total disaster. Can it be improved through technical means? How much improvement would it take for it to be better than the status quo?
_Algernon_ 7/2/2025|||
They don't have to be always right, just be right more often than a representative democracy.
bn-l 7/2/2025||
> Age assurance methods can include age verification systems, which use government documents or ID; age estimation systems, which typically use biometrics; and age inference systems, which use data about online activity or accounts to infer age.

Oh how convenient.

jauntywundrkind 7/2/2025|
What an awful sad fall for us all, from such lofty heights of possibility for technology, to a seemingly endless age of both humans being exploited and mechanized by technology and governments doing only the saddest most important useless clutching of pearls fear responses that do nothing to coax the world towards better.

Apologies. I'm already pretty morose over the USA Supreme Court allowing age verification, which although claiming to target porn seems so likely to cudgel any "adult" or sexual material at all.

Until recently the Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace has held pretty true. The online world has seen various regulations but mostly it's been taxes and businesses affected, and here we see a turn where humanity is now denied access by their governments, where we are no longer allowed to connect or to share, not without flashing our government verified id. It's such a sad lowering of the world, to such absolutely loser politicians doing such bitter pathetic anti governance for such low reasons. They impinge on the fundamental dignity & respect inherent on mankind here, in these intrusions into how we may think and connect.

Links for recent Texas age verification: https://www.wired.com/story/us-supreme-court-porn-age-verifi... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44397799

More comments...