Top
Best
New

Posted by jsheard 9/1/2025

Google AI Overview made up an elaborate story about me(bsky.app)
698 points | 278 commentspage 3
ChrisMarshallNY 9/1/2025|
About a month ago, we had this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44615801

Dave Barry is pretty much A-list famous.

devinprater 9/1/2025||
I asked Meta Raybans about me, and they said I died last September.
layer8 9/1/2025|
Are you familiar with the movie The Sixth Sense?
userbinator 9/1/2025||
"AI Responses May Include Mistakes": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44142113

IMHO the more people get trained to automatically ignore the "AI summary", just like many have conditioned to do the same to ads, the better.

Rohansi 9/2/2025|
I don't know if that will happen though because, for the people who don't know or don't care about correctness, skimming through the AI "summary" is far more convenient than actually checking any of the search results.
nosmokewhereiam 9/1/2025||
I wish I could build the speech jammer, his coolest project. I also am an adult and understand why I can't have one.
croes 9/1/2025||
Not the first misattribution by an AI

https://theconversation.com/why-microsofts-copilot-ai-falsel...

Definitely not the last.

jug 9/1/2025||
You should be able to sue Google for libel for this and disclaimers on AI accuracy in their fine print should not matter. It's obvious that too many people don't care about these to make these rumors reach critical mass and become self sustaining.
thebytefairy 9/2/2025||
Everyone was dumping on google when OpenAI first launched ChatGPT for playing it too safe and falling behind on cool new tech. Now everyone's upset LLMs are hallucinating and say they shouldn't launch things until proven safe.
FrancisMoodie 9/2/2025|
This is such a weird argument. People were dumping on google because they had already been working on LLM's and machine learning products for quite a few years before Chatgpt released their first public model, and with how much capital and talent google has it was justified criticism how they now also fell behind this piece of new technology. This was before we knew the extent of hallucinations and were still under the impression that they would soon be solved. Now we can clearly see that hallucinations are a problem, especially when you're summarizing information on top of a search query, which yes, they should at least be careful about when releasing, so things like this issue don't happen.
peterkelly 9/1/2025||
There was a post on HN the other day where someone was launching an email assistant that used AI to summarise emails that you received. The idea didn't excite me, it scared me.

I really wish the tech industry would stop rushing out unreliable misinformation generators like this without regard for the risks.

Google's "AI summaries" are going to get someone killed one day. Especially with regards to sensitive topics, it's basically an autonomous agent that automates the otherwise time-consuming process of defamation.

blibble 9/1/2025||
the "AI" bullshitters need to be liable for this type of wilful defamation

and it is wilful, they know full well it has no concept of truthfulness, yet they serve up its slop output directly into the faces of billions of people

and if this makes "AI" nonviable as a business? tough shit

gruez 9/1/2025|
[flagged]
oxguy3 9/1/2025|||
The AI summaries in Google aren't presented as wild hallucinations; they show up in an authoritative looking box as an answer to the query you just typed. The New York Times wouldn't be able to get out of libel suits by adding a tiny disclaimer to their masthead; why should it be different for Google?
gruez 9/1/2025||
[flagged]
oxguy3 9/1/2025|||
Fortune tellers typically tell you extremely vague things that are designed to trick you into interpreting them favorably; you hear what you want to hear. "Someone new will come into your life soon" or "Something exciting will happen next week" are not claims that can be disproved.

They certainly don't make hyperspecific claims like "this YouTuber traveled to Israel and changed his mind about the war there, as documented in a video he posted on August 18".

atq2119 9/1/2025||||
Google aren't advertising their search as "for entertainment purposes only" though.

And even if they did, it wouldn't really matter. The way Google search is overwhelmingly used in practice, misinformation spread by it is a public hazard and needs to be treated as such.

gruez 9/1/2025||
>Google aren't advertising their search as "for entertainment purposes only" though.

So you accept that all of this is just a quibble over what the disclaimer says? Rather than "AI generated, might contain mistakes", it should just say "for entertainment purposes only" and they'll be in the clear?

aDyslecticCrow 9/1/2025|||
You can sue a fortune teller too if they tell people you're a sex offender and drink piss.
gruez 9/1/2025||
Anyone can sue, but has there been a case of a fortune teller actually losing? What if there was no involvement from the fortune teller at all, like if the client asked "is my wife cheating on me", and all 3 cards drawn were in the affirmative?
antonvs 9/1/2025|||
Fortune telling for profit is illegal in several big US states and other jurisdictions, including e.g. Pennsylvania and New York, for the same kinds of reasons being discussed. It’s not ok to make things up to make a profit unless you’re doing so purely for entertainment, i.e. it’s understood that the statements are fictional.

The Google disclaimer should probably be upfront and say something more like, “The following statements are fictional, provided for entertainment purposes only. Any resemblance to persons living or dead are purely coincidental.”

const_cast 9/1/2025||||
Yes, people have lost libel and defamation suits. Its not like being a fortune teller means you can magically lie.
aDyslecticCrow 9/1/2025|||
Fortune telling is a bad strawman and you know it. Fortune tellers talk with one person, give vague advice, and may destroy a relationship at worst.

If a Fortune teller published articles claiming false things about random prople, gave dangerous medical advice, claiming to be a Nigerian prince, or convinced you to put all your savings into bitcoin; the "entertainment purposes" shield dissolves quite quickly.

Google makes an authorative statement on top of the worlds most used search engine, in a similar way they previously did with Wikipedia for relevant topics.

The little disclaimer should not shield them from doing real tangible harm to people.

mattbuilds 9/1/2025||||
That’s a false equivalency, sorry that some of us think companies should actually be responsible for the things they produce.
lupusreal 9/1/2025|||
Gruez supports genocide.

DISCLAIMER: I often make shit up!

mxmilkiib 9/3/2025|
hah, I literally monetarily subscribed to Hasan several days ago so I could send that exact video to them in chat, because it has some horribly bad logic and guff understanding of political science and needs a critical deconstruction

I have watched Ryan on occasion for their info and opinion, but was sorely disappointed by that video n their reaction to what was presented to them on their visit and then how they presented it to the general public

"duck duck go Murray Bookchin"

More comments...