Posted by bookofjoe 9/4/2025
AS, in short, it is easy to measure pulse or sleep somehow. It is hard to measure it well consistently (pulse when someone is running, biking or weightlifting, sleep when people sleep with others, move, etc - or lay sleepless).
The linked article is a bit light on actual details – could you share the paper/preprint maybe?
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/11096342
That’s the official paper link. Sorry it’s not open access.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37469920 (from the same org)
I mean, heart rate? Do we have a giant network that can tell where everybody is and whether they are having a strong emotional response to anything?
Mobile phone spyware can attack poorly patched or corporate controlled WiFi radio basebands, for 3D imaging of human user behavior.
> heart rate
Laptop demo (2022), https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/research/respiration... | https://community.intel.com/t5/Blogs/Tech-Innovation/Client/...
Intel Labs introduces.. respiration sensing via Wi-Fi.
I'll try to find the model to rescue your post. People can be so fucking unreasonable here it makes me sad.
But I know exactly what you're referring to.
Note: it's also worth considering its applications in parallel construction and that it's indeed so rarely known, that it doesn't require a warrant.
Edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range-R
Edit II: they were, at one time around 2011 definitely having a lot of fun with these devices in my town here in Florida.
Edit III: also of interest, https://camero-tech.com/
Edit IV: https://www.policemag.com/technology/article/15541542/first-... - Detex Pro, by MaXentric
Am so confused.
- Whether train/test splits were participant-wise to avoid data leakage.
- How the system performs at elevated or highly variable heart rates.
- Results from "placebo" or empty-room baselines to rule out false positives, typically done with bags of rice/water (used to simulate mass).
Impressive from a technical standpoint, but super scary from a privacy standpoint. Surely this must allow them to detect and differentiate between plosives, which is probably enough to infer what's being talked about.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-77683-1
That kind of module can be really cheap
https://www.waveshare.com/hmmd-mmwave-sensor.htm
and is starting to replace Passive IR sensors
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_infrared_sensor
I can imagine one of these on the ceiling above your bed being an ideal sleep monitoring system.
Google: serves you Aspirin ads when they notice you are having a heart attack
"Inside a $1 radar motion sensor" (2024), 100 comments, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40834349
"mmWave radar, you won't see it coming" (2022), 180 comments, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30172647
"What Is mmWave Radar?: Everything You Need to Know About FMCW" (2022), 30 comments, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35312351
But not all of them are good for doing stuff like this.
You need full raw I/Q and DAC access to sweep the frequency.
Chinese vendors sell uC+Radar-Module units on Aliexpress for around ~20-30€. They Infineon-based boards are super easy to spot by looking at the Antenna-on-Chip layout.
You can cut off their head (microcontroller) and directly attach your favorite uC onto the SPI bus to talk to them. Or use the existing one.. not overly complicated to reverse engineer the schematic.
Example: MicRadar RA60ATR2