Top
Best
New

Posted by appreciatorBus 7 days ago

The Rise and Demise of RSS (2018)(twobithistory.org)
36 points | 72 commentspage 3
renewiltord 3 days ago|
RSS is dead. Netcraft confirms.
brycewray 3 days ago||
(2018)
vamosg 3 days ago||
[dead]
skeezyboy 4 days ago|
never understood this idea. whats the difference between this and bookmarking the actual site and just manually checking? if people had been using HTML as originally envisioned, this kind of thing would be parsable by a browser and a new protocol need not be introduced
latexr 4 days ago||
> whats the difference between this and bookmarking the actual site and just manually checking?

For one, not having to manually check is huge. If someone posts once every two months, I’m not going to manually open their website every day (times twenty for every one) or even every week and then have to think “have I read this?”. That would be a colossal waste of time, attention, and mental energy.

For another, there’s a plethora of cases where RSS filters. I subscribe to YouTube channels exclusively through RSS, I never open the website (or even have an account) otherwise. Same for Reddit, they have specific feeds for each subreddit, and for each they can even list just the top daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly posts. I can easily get just the most interesting posts of something like r/toolgifs without ever having to deal with the faff or getting distracted by other junk.

Content comes to me, and on my terms.

HankStallone 3 days ago||
I don't know why it never occurred to me before to see if Reddit has per-subreddit RSS feeds. I still go to subs individually, which is annoying for the lightly-used ones. I either check in every day, seeing nothing new 90% of the time, or I check in every week or two, and miss the one conversation that actually happened. And even in busier subs, the default sorting can make it easy to miss new posts.

Time to add a new section in my RSS reader (TT-RSS). Thanks!

hshdhdhj4444 4 days ago|||
RSS doesn’t have formatting and interactions.

It’s content only.

It’s also a drastically simpler standard than HTML making creating RSS clients far easier than an HTML client.

Finally it is designed to push new content in a way HTML isn’t. I can tell my RSS client to only download all the titles for all the different posts and only download the content on actually clicking through. Thats something HTML cannot do. Further, my client can easily retrieve changes since it last checked which HTML doesn’t allow.

Lots of differences. Overloading HTML which even at its simplest is about fixed text and overloading that with handling temporal lists of atomic data would be a bad idea.

crtasm 3 days ago|||
Reading offline; having a plaintext list of headlines (and optionally the main image) that I can easily look through instead of having to process all the visual noise of a website and click through multiple pages; a lot of websites don't even have a chronological view of their posts.
nickthegreek 3 days ago|||
RSS allows you to check all your sites at once, instead of manually checking many sites just to see nothing new has been posted. I can instantly see in my RSS reader right now that I have 14 articles in my Politics folder, 7 in my Tech, 6 in my YT, 18 in Music.
timw4mail 4 days ago||
Automation, and ease of skimming articles for one.