Top
Best
New

Posted by keyboardJones 4 days ago

Signal Secure Backups(signal.org)
977 points | 440 comments
nikeee 4 days ago|
> alongside features that let you transfer your encrypted message history between Android, iOS, and Desktop devices.

That's actually the feature I've been looking forward to. As I moved vom Android to iOS, I lost _all_ message histories from all messenger apps that use E2EE (Signal, WhatsApp, Threema, etc). The only one that "just worked" was Telegram due to not being encrypted. WhatsApp had a migration app that has to be done when setting up the iPhone, but it failed due to some bug. Signal had backups, but they didn't seem to be compatible between different OS versions.

giancarlostoro 3 days ago||
I've always been able to transfer history, from Android phone to Android phone, when I switched to iOS, I didn't bother since my wife was just going to start using Messages due to its encrypted nature. I really only used Signal with my wife, she only used it because I was using it and it allowed us to send images back and forth without losing quality.
47282847 2 days ago||
> without losing quality

Signal does lossy compression on images. You can change image quality from “Standard“ to “High“ in its settings but not disable it.

nar001 4 days ago|||
You already can, if you at least set up desktop, you can transfer also message history, though you won't have your media older than 45 days. Maybe it can work as a stopgap before they roll out encrypeted backups everywhere
zbrozek 4 days ago||
That's a weird and crappy arbitrary limitation when I could move an arbitrary amount of data between the two devices otherwise. It's the worst part of Signal.
rjzzleep 4 days ago|||
On top of that you don't have that limitation on Android. It's like enterprise IT, where you put up restrictions everywhere on files and then people can upload files to their personal one drive.
anilakar 4 days ago|||
It also does not work on Windows clients but errors out. Android and Linux are fine.
nar001 3 days ago||
It does for me, sure why it errors out for you
littlestymaar 4 days ago|||
> WhatsApp had a migration app that has to be done when setting up the iPhone, but it failed due to some bug.

It's appalling to see how poor there QA is for a company that big. They also have a migration tool for migrations between android devices without going through a Google drive, but this one didn't work either when I tried it two years ago.

arccy 4 days ago||
doesn't signal also have a transfer to other device flow now?
flaburgan 4 days ago|||
They have it between two Android phones next to each other for years, but probably not Android to iOS
internet_points 3 days ago|||
iOS to iOS works

Android to Android works

iOS to/from Android does not work

stolen phone to new phone does not work :)

giancarlostoro 3 days ago||
> stolen phone to new phone does not work :)

I'm curious about that, has this been tested by someone who "steals" the phone, and tries to migrate before the actual phone owner even realizes?

internet_points 2 days ago|||
haha I was actually thinking of the case where you don't have your phone any more and want your signal history, but that's another way to read it :)
jraph 2 days ago|||
you need to be able to unlock the phone and then you need the Signal PIN code for this.
akkartik 4 days ago||
This looks brilliant. I just hope they make it easy to do test restores. In particular, I want to test restore without perturbing my main device. Let me restore using the secret key on a new device.

When I install Signal on a computer it won't show me message history. Will backups allow me to view _all_ my message history on a computer? A big screen is very helpful for browsing lots of messages.

greysonp 4 days ago||
Hi there, Signal dev here. You can sort of do this! You can restore on your new device, and while you will be unregistered on your old device, all of the data is still there. So if you see that something is amiss on the new device, you could re-register on your old device and you'd be right back where you started. This is actually one of the ways we test the feature with our own personal data.
eigenspace 4 days ago|||
Hey, i have a related question about this:

I have an old iPhone that has all my old Signal messages still on it that I wasnt able to move with me when I switched to Android. Is there any way that I can use these new tools to move the old conversations on my iPhone over to my android phone without losing all the new messages that are on my android now?

That is, I want to merge the two histories.

codethief 4 days ago|||
Using the new backup feature that we're discussing here (once it is available on iOS), you will probably need to transfer your old iPhone's data to an Android device first (either a secondary one or your current one, provided you have backed up its data to a backup file). Then follow https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45174779 .
greysonp 3 days ago|||
Unfortunately we don't have immediate plans to support merging of histories. As others have noted, you may be able to use third-party tools to merge them together, but that's very much a "at your own risk" sort of thing :)
oezi 4 days ago||||
Multi-device would be a nice feature.

And question: Will a backup taken today on Androis be able to be restored on iOS once released?

winterqt 4 days ago||
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45171576.
nuker 3 days ago||||
Im still out of luck, I want to reinstall my iPhone (not a transfer to another phone) and cannot find a way to preserve chats.

Signal Desktop app on Mac linked, shows chats, but all pics are missing and "Download Failed" if clicked.

And I'm not sure I can import from Desktop back to my erased iPhone...

aprilnya 4 days ago||
As of a few months ago, when setting up Desktop you do actually get an option to copy your message history to it
akkartik 4 days ago|||
Thanks for the heads-up! Signal on the Desktop has receded for me in the past year when I moved to an Arch- rather than Debian-based distro (Ubuntu to Manjaro). This might get me to reconsider. (Ugh.)
derefr 4 days ago||
@Signal devs: any reason that the only two options for backup are now "locally" (flexible, but only solves for some use-cases) or "to Signal's special servers" (not flexible; might be legally impossible for many users to enable)?

Because it seems to me that, for much of Signal's (often paranoid) audience, they'd much rather use one of the backup/sync providers they've already verified trust of, than have to additionally trust some new backup service provider.

And it also seems to me that, now that Signal has the architecture to support this, it'd be pretty easy to add additional backup-sync providers.

E.g. in the codebase for the iOS Signal client, you could implement a provider that does incremental backup sync against iCloud (i.e. CloudKit for messages + iCloud Drive for attachments) — allowing the user to use their (perhaps already paid-tier) iCloud account storage.

Same with Android and Google Drive (though Google Drive doesn't have an equivalent to CloudKit, so this might be fiddly; to get good amortized write costs, you might have to e.g. buffer row-like writes in a local replication journal, and then flush them through bulk local key inserts in a locally-partial-fetch-cached set of LevelDB files, where the updated files in the set then get flushed as single whole-file overwrites to GDrive.)

---

Note that in all cases, Signal could/should still fully encrypt this data before pushing it to the provider; the backup wouldn't be expected to be "legible" to the user.

But where, with backups synced to Signal's servers, users need to trust that Signal's E2E backups encryption works perfectly to be able to believe that Signal themselves can't then have access to your backed-up data; it's much less scary to sync to literally any other provider, who won't specifically know that they've got chat data on their hands / won't have any potential to (perhaps after a bad acquisition by a PE firm) begin thinking of themselves as a "data company" who would love to have "chat data" as an asset.

jimkleiber 4 days ago||
Perhaps they will?

> Our future plans include letting you save a secure backup archive to the location of your choosing

_aavaa_ 4 days ago||
A backup option has been missing for years. Future plans on this particular topic seem to take forever.
jimkleiber 4 days ago|||
I built a micro-journaling app back in the day and wanted it to be highly secure. Backups seemed to be one of the most vulnerable surfaces for that. I imagine their delay might have been a combination of a technological and ideological worries, as that's what I experienced.
_aavaa_ 3 days ago||
How did you encrypt the data at rest and why was that also not good for the backup?
jimkleiber 3 days ago||
SQLcipher, and i believe the tech was good but at the time, because it asked for a password every time the app open, i figured most people would put a very short and simple password and an encrypted db with a short password was a lot more hackable, especially on Android, if the file got outside the app sandbox.

I suppose now i could do some combination of PIN plus passkey, and have to figure out how to make the database recoverable if people forget their PIN (or lose their passkey?) without me having to store it for them or it being easy to access.

I'm no expert on this, just think the complexity can be a lot more when taking this all into consideration.

crtasm 4 days ago|||
It's been backing up to my SD card for years, I've not set up a script to transfer it off-device though.
_aavaa_ 3 days ago||
That only works on android. The same basic functionally, even backing up to a place on the phone, has been missing.
nar001 4 days ago|||
I'm confused, what's stopping you from using one of the backup services you already have on the file after it's done? Since Signal would backup to a file in your phone? Couldn't you just point your service to it and automatically sync every day for example?
daveoc64 4 days ago|||
The existing backup feature on Android doesn't do an incremental backup.

I just ran a backup, and it was 850MB. So having my phone upload something of that size every day would be a bit annoying.

Most of the major cloud storage platforms don't offer sync on Android.

It's not really a good fit for how the filesystem is used by Android apps.

I currently only do a Signal backup every few months (when I remember), and manually upload it to OneDrive.

I'm not going to pay for their new service - I already pay for too many storage services.

styanax 3 days ago||
> I just ran a backup, and it was 850MB. So having my phone upload something of that size every day would be a bit annoying

It may be inconvenient but this can be solved by using the features in the app to review your storage and save those thousands of images/audio/file sequestered inside the app out to the filesystem, then delete them from the app. You're not backing up "chats" you're backing up your image library being stored inside a chat app.

(yes I get the argument that you need to store them "in context" so save those and do the rest. there's no way 100% of that 850MB is "must have saved inside the app in chats" data, I'll bet $10 USD on it)

daveoc64 3 days ago||
Reducing the size of the backup would solve one problem, but it's really the lack of automation of the process that's the annoying part.
styanax 3 days ago||
We're partially there, under Storage is an option allowing you to set how long to keep messages and I've set mine to one year. Possible: forever (default), 1y, 6mo, 30d - and it works, my old chat messages (not the whole chat, just individuals) are properly culled over time.

Edit: in context, Google Messages has none of these features and I have friends still married to Google Voice who send me tons of pics. Culling SMS requires using a third party tool to export and re-import etc. leagues behind Signal. None of it's backed up without the same third party tools as well and no built in image management.

hackmiester 4 days ago|||
Well, just to be clear, signal for iOS did not support ANY backup before this.
Silhouette 4 days ago|||
Note that in all cases, Signal could/should still fully encrypt this data before pushing it to the provider; the backup wouldn't be expected to be "legible" to the user.

That seems like an unhelpful limitation for a lot of people. For me - and as far as I know literally everyone I communicate with using Signal - the reason to use it is the E2EE for the messages. Once we have the messages or media on our own devices we're fine with having control over them ourselves. By all means also provide an option to create a secured archive for those who want it. But as long as the data can only be read using a specific app on a specific device then whatever you're creating isn't really a backup for a lot of practical purposes.

varenc 4 days ago||
Agree with the sentiment, but I can understand why they don't offer this. Rational or not, people will feel less safe if all their messages can just be easily exported to plaintext. A few scenarios where this might matter like the 'evil maid attack' where someone briefly has access to your unlocked phone.

But I just use this project to export my signal messages to plaintext: https://github.com/tbvdm/sigtop

I have it auto run periodically and it's great. Makes for easy full text searching of my message history.

Silhouette 4 days ago||
Rational or not, people will feel less safe if all their messages can just be easily exported to plaintext.

IMHO the point is that it's not rational. Signal is as vulnerable to the analogue hole as any other messaging platform that displays the messages on a phone screen. There was never any credible way to prevent someone who has received your message from keeping or passing on the information it contained. The idea is as unrealistic as the "disappearing message/photo" applications when confronted with any cheap phone or camera separate to the one showing that message/photo. Ultimately if you don't trust the recipient of your information to treat it as you would wish then your only choice is not to send them the information in the first place.

varenc 3 days ago||
People aren't rational/perfect and Signal wants to keep them feeling safe? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

(and IMHO there are edge case scenario where the additional friction in exporting messages provides some protection. Particularly when your threat model involves imperfect actors)

edit: here's an example. Let's say I use 4 week disappearing message with everyone I chat with. That's imperfect of course, but let's say right now only about 5% of the people I chat with are proactively backing up/screenshotting my disappearing messages and the rest let messages expire. If Signal rolled out an "export all messages to plaintext" feature, then suddenly that 5% might become 50%. And now a lot more of my messages which used to disappear, are being preserved.

If everyone I chat with is a perfect 'threat actor' that always backups up every message they ever receive, then there's no difference at all. But most people aren't, so practically there's a big difference because now exporting to plaintext (and bypassing time restrictions) is trivial for the masses.

barbazoo 2 days ago|||
> Because it seems to me that, for much of Signal's (often paranoid) audience, they'd much rather use one of the backup/sync providers they've already verified trust of, than have to additionally trust some new backup service provider.

I wonder if those folks are the ones actually asking for backups. Personally I couldn’t give a shit about my messages from more than a week ago and part of that has to do with privacy. People concerned with privacy might also be more likely to have disappearing messages on which is the exact opposite of a backup. I honestly wonder who this is for exactly. From reading other threads, are people using this as their primary media backup basically?

kdmtctl 2 days ago||
This. The former core user base would prefer the definitive history destruction to a reliable backup. But this audience doesn't grow this fast anymore.
purpleidea 4 days ago|||
The signal org does some sketchy things. Like for example, why won't they release all of their infra automation backend code. There's no reason this and all the other tiny bits should be kept a secret!
palata 4 days ago||
Did you read the article?
poisonborz 4 days ago||
Backing up Signal on Android for free and offline was ~always possible. The app creates a multi GB backup file on the phone memory under the Signal folder that you can just copy out and back on a new phone.

The file is encrypted with the passcode and the database can be extracted.

https://github.com/bepaald/signalbackup-tools

Sesse__ 4 days ago||
There are a couple of problems with the existing backup:

1. It is non-incremental. This means you'll need about as much free space on your phone as your Signal database takes, and it may take many hours to make if your database is large (mine is 18GB). I used to wake up to find my phone had not even fully charged because it had been so busy writing Signal backups.

2. Once you have it on disk, how do you get it away from your phone? Especially after SyncThing disappeared from Play Store (because it was basically a non-Android app behind a thin Android shell that couldn't easily be upgraded to more modern native APIs), there's nothing super-obvious here.

I would have loved a better solution for local backups, but realistically, $2/month for cloud backup is really cheap, and a pragmatic solution.

dns_snek 4 days ago|||
> Especially after SyncThing disappeared from Play Store (because it was basically a non-Android app behind a thin Android shell that couldn't easily be upgraded to more modern native APIs), there's nothing super-obvious here.

That's not what happened, it was Google who started rejecting their updates on Play store. I believe the original Android app maintainer quit after that but there's a fork on on F-droid which works perfectly.

graemep 4 days ago||
fork that will work perfectly until year after next.
npoc 4 days ago|||
Not if you run the GrapheneOS variant of Android.
graemep 4 days ago||
I would love to but my banking apps only work on Google Android.
npoc 2 days ago||
Unlucky. All three of mine work on GrapheneOS

https://privsec.dev/posts/android/banking-applications-compa...

Zambyte 4 days ago|||
Why?
cyphar 4 days ago||
Presumably they're referring to Google's plans to roll out developer signing requirements for all apps[1], which will affect F-Droid-installed apps.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45017028

Sanzig 4 days ago|||
Assuming that the developer of Syncthing-Fork doesn't mind providing ID to Google, they shouldn't have an issue getting a signing key (we will see how this works in practice). They aren't doing anything objectionable to Google.

The bigger issue for third party apps will be things like Newpipe, where applying for a key will put the developers in danger of a lawsuit because it affects Google's business.

(The APK signing requirement is a fiasco, I'm not defending Google. Just pointing out that this app will probably not be as seriously impacted as others).

sunaookami 4 days ago|||
FWIW, adb install will continue to work: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Android-s-app-sideloading-bloc...
zamadatix 4 days ago||||
The $1.99/m is not for the up front work of fixing what sucks about current backups though, it's just bundling those fixes in with YACSS (Yet Another Cloud Storage Subscription) is the only way to get people to pay their "reasonable" recurring fee.

People here seem to want to answer the question of how to copy data most directly, but only because that's how the problem was phrased. I'm not convinced "users had no way to sync data on their phone" was/is a real problem worth paying for YACSS for in the first place.

andrepd 4 days ago|||
Explicitly, from TFA:

> But secure backups aren’t the end of the road. The technology that underpins this initial version of secure backups will also serve as the foundation for more secure backup options in the near future. Our future plans include letting you save a secure backup archive to the location of your choosing, alongside features that let you transfer your encrypted message history between Android, iOS, and Desktop devices.

zamadatix 4 days ago|||
Yeah, they're definitely fully aware. If they ever do actually get cross device local backup I'll be particularly pleased, several years back the stance was basically "working as intended".
Tepix 4 days ago|||
Looking at how long it‘s taking them i wouldn‘t hold my breath!
godelski 4 days ago|||
Not to mention that this is a pretty good way to fund Signal. That's always been a challenge with Open Source projects as not enough people want to donate. On that note, a lot of companies will do donation matching and just saying, that's one way you could go about it if you feel inclined. For an app I use every day, I don't mind throwing them some beer money (and having work pitch in too). I get more utility out of it than my Spotify subscription
stevenwalton 4 days ago||||

  > Once you have it on disk, how do you get it away from your phone?
Since we're talking about Android, a great method is to just use Termux and rsync. You can write a pretty quick and dirty shell script to accomplish this. Here, I'll drop mine[0]. It's no the cleanest but it'll get the job done and has some documentation to it. It will check if you're on WiFi and connected to a specific SSID. You can change this around pretty easily to do different things like point at 2 servers, use Tailscale, give a white list of allowed SSIDs, change the rsync to have it delete from the local storage, or whatever. If you don't know how you can reply to this comment or open an issue and I'll respond[1].

Unfortunately this doesn't work on iPhone. I have a shortcut that will do something similar that I can share but that is a lot hackier...

[0] https://github.com/stevenwalton/.dotfiles/blob/master/script...

[1] Probably better. I'm normally logged into my alt account

autoexec 4 days ago||||
> Once you have it on disk, how do you get it away from your phone?

plug your phone into a computer? Install Termux and use one of the countless command line programs designed to transfer bits over a network?

codethief 4 days ago||
I think GP was talking about how to transfer the backup 1) daily, 2) in an automated manner, and 3) reliably and in time (before, 48h later, Signal overrides the existing backup on your phone later with a new one).

This is not trivial when each backup archive is in the order of 20 GB.

justoreply 4 days ago||||
You can still use https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.github.catfriend1.syncth...
whatevaa 4 days ago||||
On Linux KDE connect can mount your phones filesystem as FUSE filesystem and then you can use desktop file explorer like dolphin. It's even integrated and automatically apears as an option. Quite convenient, I would say. Performance is pretty good too.
andrepd 4 days ago||
Any Linux desktop can do that via MTP (Google doesn't allow access as mass storage anymore)
jowea 4 days ago|||
Maybe it's just me but doing a big transfer over cable is a crapshot since it will disconnect midtransfer. KDE connect is a bit better but syncthing is the best solution still.
taylortbb 4 days ago|||
Doesn't MTP require plugging in a USB cable? KDE Connect works wirelessly as long as your phone and computer are on the same network.
godelski 4 days ago||
KDE Connect just uses an SFTP file mount. You can do that on any system that you can ssh.

But I wouldn't use that for backups, I'd use rsync.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/SSHFS

Dunedan 4 days ago||||
> There are a couple of problems with the existing backup:

>

> 1. It is non-incremental.

I wonder if that's differently with the newly announced functionality. Their announcement doesn't sound like it:

> Once you’ve enabled secure backups, your device will automatically create a fresh secure backup archive every day, replacing the previous day’s archive.

Dunedan 4 days ago||
@greysonp verified they're indeed incremental for media: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45170515#45175402
aftbit 4 days ago||||
I would use scp under Termux to copy the backup away personally.
nottorp 4 days ago||||
> Once you have it on disk, how do you get it away from your phone?

adb pull no worky? At least for HN readers.

Sesse__ 4 days ago||
Any backup that needs manual intervention is no backup.
dmesg 4 days ago|||
Even automatic backups run at intervals to cause less server load. The article says you absolutely have to write down your restore key too (They say notebook or PW manager).

It may seem obvious now, but I know most people will forget and be puzzled if their phone suffers physical damage. A lot about this has mandatory manual steps.

kelnos 4 days ago||
I think you misunderstand. Any backup that requires a manual step every time a backup is created is not a backup. A backup that requires some one-time manual setup, like recording a restore key, is fine.

Yes, there are some people who will forget to do that, or just lose the restore key, but that's the security/usability trade off.

nottorp 4 days ago|||
Thought people are talking about backups without a "cloud" involved. So you'd need to manually connect your phone to something...
nine_k 4 days ago|||
Wireguard + syncthing (from F-Droid) work fine. Triggering it when the phone is on the charger makes it very easy to sync things from a computer to the phone, while next to the computer.
hiq 4 days ago||
To be clear, Signal + Syncthing also works fine, that's what I have.
XorNot 4 days ago||
It absolutely does not work fine. Keeping 2x the size of my database in free space on my phone to let backups work it's no solution at all, which is why I stopped doing it. (The backup creates two files - current and previous, and Syncthing can't remove complete files to another location, so you need an actually rather difficult to write script to do it).
roywiggins 4 days ago|||
I never really grokked Syncthing.

I recently vibe-coded a crappy Windows Go GUI to grab files off my phone via rclone & sshd4a and then optionally delete them, but it's a very manual process since sshd4a has to be running on the phone before I initiate the pull.

XorNot 4 days ago||
Syncthing is just open source Dropbox, self hosted.

It's entire purpose is "make two folders identical".

It's very good at that: so good that I frequently wish it did other things - i.e. if it had some notion of minimum seeding levels so it would destage files off a device provided they were replicated elsewhere (e.g. automatically clearing old photos off your phone would be a good use of it).

roywiggins 3 days ago||
Yeah, I think I was just trying to get it to do something it wasn't suited for!
nine_k 4 days ago|||
I see. I was talking about Syncthing in general, not about the specific way of backing up Signal.
Sesse__ 4 days ago|||
What? My phone has a perfectly working 802.11 chipset, which is able to talk to my very own machines that are not in a cloud, no manual connection needed. This is purely a software/ecosystem issue.
dmesg 4 days ago||
Imagine we could run the backup server backend self-hosted and FLOSS. Like Vaultwarden, the upstream bitwarden client API.
UltraSane 4 days ago||||
USB transfer is by far the best way to transfer large amounts of data to and from phones.
codethief 4 days ago||
Really? Ever since Android devices ceased to be regular USB storage devices and switched to MTP, this has never worked well for me. MTP is incredibly slow.
UltraSane 4 days ago||
What method do you find to be faster?
roywiggins 4 days ago|||
MTP is so slow that when I have enough photos and videos on my phone, Windows will crap itself and stall out just trying to list the folder. It's functionally unusable and I don't know how I'd get those files off the phone if I didn't use literally anything else. If it was mass storage I could just rsync it over USB but it isn't so I can't.

I ended up using rclone on Windows with an rsync server running on the phone, I think sshd4a usually.

codethief 4 days ago||||
Pretty much any other: Connecting my phone to my computer as USB storage (when it was still possible), connecting a thumb drive to my phone, syncing files using Syncthing, using adb, …
kzshantonu 4 days ago|||
Copyparty running in termux serving over USB tethering
bmicraft 4 days ago||||
Foldersync is a great app
jp191919 4 days ago||||
>2. Once you have it on disk, how do you get it away from your phone? I've been using Nextcloud for my backups for the past couple years.
aaron_m04 4 days ago||||
#1 does suck very much.

My solution for #2 is an sshd I start up in Termux when I need to backup. I just rsync the file onto my computer.

h4ck_th3_pl4n3t 4 days ago||||
How can an encrypted backup be incremental if it's supposed to be never decrypted on-remote-machines?

Ever thought about that?

tremon 4 days ago|||
Why would you need remote data to create an incremental backup?
codethief 4 days ago||||
I'm sure if borgbackup can pull this off, Signal can, too?

The solution is to split up your data into encrypted chunks, and only upload the new ones.

zorgmonkey 3 days ago||||
Why wouldn't it be possible? All it really means is that you need to do the work to make incremental entirely on the local side and not on the remote side.
palebluedot 4 days ago|||
That seems pretty trivial to implement
h4ck_th3_pl4n3t 4 days ago||
I dare you to implement this then, where others have failed.
Sesse__ 4 days ago||
tar --listed-incremental=foo.snar -cf - . | gpg --encrypt -r <key> > nightly.gpg

You're welcome.

jcynix 4 days ago||||
> Once you have it on disk, how do you get it away from your phone?

On Android? Easy, Termux app and then rsync to my Desktop/Laptop. Or via Solid Explorer. Or E-Mail via Blitzmail.

Non incremental is a suboptimal design decision, backups should be incremental, e.g. monthly if automated or with from-to dates.

arccy 4 days ago|||
at least on android: you use a good old usb-c cable.
growse 4 days ago|||
Personally, I find that having orchestrate and regularly schedule the exporting of that file off my device to somewhere else, and then look after it there to be not "free".

The new offering is reasonably priced imo.

_heimdall 4 days ago||
Agreed. I prefer setting it up myself and have had Signal backing up to my home server for a few years now, but for most users an opt-in with a basic free tier and cheap enough paid plan makes a lot of sense.

Glad to see they're finding potential revenue streams that don't compromise their focus on privacy and security.

dcow 4 days ago||
They even say they’re committed to offering BYO storage as the feature matures
jacooper 4 days ago|||
This trick never worked for me, the app just never restores this. People used to say the same about WhatsApp. Now both have direct migration features.
anilakar 4 days ago|||
If you restore the backup on a new phone, you'll have to resync all desktop machines, and at least on Windows syncing old messages has never worked for me.
poisonborz 4 days ago||
Signal never syncs old messages on secondary clients for security reasons.
anilakar 3 days ago|||
They do. They also offer to do it when you link your desktop client, and like I said, it works on Linux but gives an error message on Windows.

Also, considering that linking requires access to your existing device I don't see an issue with that. Moxie himself considered usability to be more important than tinfoil hat-level crypto because large-scale adoption is what enables security.

AnonC 3 days ago||
> They do.

The limitation is that only message history from the past 45 days would be synced. If this has changed recently to allow syncing all message history, I’d be thrilled!

privacyking 4 days ago|||
I don't think that's true anymore. They added message history syncing
tjoff 4 days ago||
Yeah, didn't see it mentioned, I trust it will still be available?
halyconWays 4 days ago||
I bet they'll phase it out and try to force their worse service, wherein your data is stored on their servers, like they tried to do with PINs. It took enormous pushback to get them to stop mandatory PINs, and even then they made it nagware for a year or two.

I didn't trust their rationale about PINs and remote attestation somehow meaning your data is secured by a small passphrase, just like I won't trust them to not remove a useful and existing feature I already rely on for backups.

Also not mentioned, they designed their existing backup solution to require reverse-engineered community solutions to actually access your data; I have to use a Github project to unencrypt the backup and export my chats, which is something I've never had to do with any other messenger.

codethief 4 days ago||
While I understand (and share) your criticism, it does sound like they'll continue to support local backups:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45171576

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45172188

halyconWays 4 days ago||
From your link, I wish they would answer this, and they've been asked numerous times, and to my knowledge have avoided the question (which is very concerning to me):

>This is excellent news! Will there also be official documentation on the backup format, potentially even official tooling like signalbackup-tools[0] to access/parse backups offline? I'm asking because, having used Signal/TextSecure for 10 years now, my backups are worth a lot to me (obviously) and there have been times when I would have liked to mine & process my backed-up data. (Extract media from conversations in an automated manner, build a more elaborate search, …)

I'm like that poster and backup all my chats obsessively, since way back in the day, and experienced a period with Signal where it was impossible for me to access my own data because of their position.

codethief 3 days ago||
> I'm like that poster

So you're like me :)

Greyson answered my question btw.

amluto 4 days ago||
Wow, maybe as a side effect users will be able to migrate between Android and iOS without losing their message history.

Seriously, why is the migration protocol completely different on the two platforms?

greysonp 4 days ago||
Hi there, Signal dev here. The new backup format is indeed cross-platform. I've successfully restored backups on an iPhone, we're just stabilizing things :)

If you're curious, the reason that Android's current local backups aren't cross platform is because it was made a long time ago, and it's literally a dump of all the sqlite statements that can be used to recreate Android's sqlite database (encrypted with a strong, random, local key). So not the most portable!

But this new thing is all cross-platform, and in the near future we'll even be making our local backups cross-platform.

codethief 4 days ago|||
Hi Greyson!

> But this new thing is all cross-platform, and in the near future we'll even be making our local backups cross-platform.

This is excellent news! Will there also be official documentation on the backup format, potentially even official tooling like signalbackup-tools[0] to access/parse backups offline? I'm asking because, having used Signal/TextSecure for 10 years now, my backups are worth a lot to me (obviously) and there have been times when I would have liked to mine & process my backed-up data. (Extract media from conversations in an automated manner, build a more elaborate search, …)

My backups have also reached the point where they are so big (15-20 GB) that it's starting to become difficult to conduct a backup each day and sync it successfully before it gets overridden 48h later. So unless I start using the new "cloud backup" feature[1] (which I'm not sure I want to), at some point I will have to archive my existing Signal conversations somewhere and start from scratch (i.e. reset the app). In that case, it would be nice if there was an officially documented way to merge & read new and old backups offline (on my desktop), similar to what [0] provides right now.

[0]: https://github.com/bepaald/signalbackup-tools

[1]: EDIT: Actually, it seems like the new cloud backup feature doesn't support incremental backups, either? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45175387

greysonp 3 days ago|||
Hi! I don't know if we'll have anything super official, but the code is obviously all open source, and the backup file is just a stream of protobufs[1], so it shouldn't be too bad to make a tool. I know have some rough CLI tools sitting around -- I'll see if there's anything we want to clean up and release publicly when the local backup portion of this launches.

Also, as someone else noted, the format is indeed incremental. So while we'll still do the thing where we keep the last two backups on disk, because those two backups will share almost all the same media files, the size on disk will be much much smaller. As someone with a 50 GB backup file, this was very much a goal for me :)

[1] https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/blob/main/app/sr...

codethief 3 days ago||
> I'll see if there's anything we want to clean up and release publicly when the local backup portion of this launches.

That would be fantastic! Thanks so much!

> As someone with a 50 GB backup file, this was very much a goal for me :)

Haha, I'm glad I'm not the only one!

morserer 4 days ago|||
They are indeed incremental, and smaller than the current monolithic backups that Signal currently creates. [0] Yay!

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45176074

purpleidea 4 days ago||||
Hey, please get signal to release all the infrastructure automation code so someone could audit all of signal's infra and even fork if we ever needed to because of U.S. laws or so on.

There's no reason to keep it secret and no reason why signal won't speak to this point.

Thanks!

NewsaHackO 3 days ago||
What a ridiculous request.
amatecha 4 days ago||||
Will you guys ever ship an update that allows me to use my Signal iOS install that had a partially-broken migration from an older device? I was able to receive/read messages, but couldn't send. I tried to re-register but now my client is completely broken and crashes when I enter the registration verification code I get via SMS.
oezi 4 days ago||||
Will the new backup format support also conversion of filetypes between Android and iOS? In the past Voice Memos from Android couldn't be opened on iOS if they weren't sent directly between participants.
Nathan2055 4 days ago||
That's really surprising to me.

iOS has had pretty decent audio format support for a few years now: even though you can't directly import FLAC files to iTunes/Music, they are supported in the OS itself since 2017 and play fine both in Files and in Safari. The other big mainstream formats (WAV, AIFF, MP3, AAC, and ALAC) have been supported for years, and even Opus finally got picked up in 2021.

About the only non-niche audio format that isn't supported natively on Apple platforms at this point is Vorbis, which was fully superseded by Opus well over a decade ago. Even then, I believe it's possible to get Vorbis support in iOS apps using various media libraries, although I'm sure Apple frowns upon it.

I'd really love to know what's causing that incompatibility.

oezi 4 days ago||
The issue is OGG with Opus (for me) which was used by WhatsApp but isn't natively supported under iOS.

https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-iOS/issues/4539

privacyking 4 days ago||||
Do you know roughly how long before the iOS version comes out? I want to switch to iOS from android.
V__ 4 days ago|||
Are there any plans to allow backups to a custom server or another folder?
andrepd 4 days ago||
From tfa:

> But secure backups aren’t the end of the road. The technology that underpins this initial version of secure backups will also serve as the foundation for more secure backup options in the near future. Our future plans include letting you save a secure backup archive to the location of your choosing, alongside features that let you transfer your encrypted message history between Android, iOS, and Desktop devices.

V__ 4 days ago||
Thanks, totally overlooked that last paragraph.
crystaln 4 days ago|||
This is mentioned as a future feature.
antris 4 days ago||
> Seriously, why is the migration protocol completely different on the two platforms?

Because they don't want to make jumping to the competitor too easy.

cosmic_cheese 4 days ago||
This is the result of differing storage implementations in the app between platforms and has nothing to do with the platform itself. Painless cross-platform migration is possible but simply wasn’t factored into the original design. IIRC WhatsApp also has this problem.
codethief 4 days ago||
Hi @greysonp

> Once you’ve enabled secure backups, your device will automatically create a fresh secure backup archive every day, replacing the previous day’s archive.

So IIUC backups will not be incremental and I will have to re-upload my 15 GB backup archive every day? Why is that? What's the security risk here? (Obviously I'm not suggesting encrypting & uploading each message & media file individually but splitting things up into same-sized chunks, like e.g. borgbackup does.)

> At the core of secure backups is a 64-character recovery key that is generated on your device. This key is yours and yours alone; it is never shared with Signal’s servers. This key is different from your Signal PIN, which serves different purposes.

Both recovery key and Signal PIN seem to serve the exact same purpose, though, namely restoring data (conversations, contacts, account, …)? Why not unify them?

elvisloops 4 days ago||
Giving people a 64-character key also feels uncharacteristically crude for Signal. It's not realistic to hand people 64 characters and tell them to “store this securely.” Most people will screenshot it, and those screenshots will end up in unencrypted cloud backups.

That's less of a problem when the backups are local, because access to the local backups implies access to the device, but if the backups are in the cloud with no forward secrecy, this seems like a huge security backslide for Signal.

codethief 4 days ago||
I get your point but is a large set of dictionary words or 5-digit numbers (see the current backup passphrase) so much better? At the end of the day, recording entropy will always be cumbersome and there is no way around it.

> Most people will screenshot it, and those screenshots will end up in unencrypted cloud backups.

At least on Android apps can disable screenshots, though, which might be a simple way to deter people from doing that?

dlgeek 4 days ago|||
I think a large set of dictionary words are likely more user friendly. I think most people will have a lot more confidence on their ability to transcribe words to/from paper more accurately than a bunch of numbers - better built in error correction, etc.
itake 4 days ago||
Sanely formed numbers (like 4 digit groups with a checksum) seems like less writing to me, b/c I hate my hand writing.
eviks 4 days ago|||
> is a large set of dictionary words so much better?

Yes, much easier to type

cyphar 4 days ago||
And much easier to copy elsewhere or memorise (not that I would recommend the latter).
EGreg 4 days ago|||
The PIN is a lot easier to guess on a remote machine storing a backup, the space is small. In the context of your device, they can throttle it.
codethief 4 days ago||
Ah yes, the Signal PIN is backed by Intel SGX to ensure it can't be hacked even if the user has not provided enough entropy. However, why not simply rule out the low-entropy case altogether and use that randomly generated 64-character key throughout? That way, we also wouldn't have to trust Intel SGX… (which I think we shouldn't)
greysonp 4 days ago|||
Hi there!

> So IIUC backups will not be incremental

Nope! It's very much incremental :) At least the media is. There's one blob of containing all of your messages+metadata which does have to be re-uploaded every night, but for most people that's gonna be somewhere in the low-tens of MB. Your attachments are uploaded incrementally one at a time, typically as they're sent/received, so you usually don't even have to wait to upload them at backup-time.

> Both recovery key and Signal PIN seem to serve the exact same purpose, though, namely restoring data (conversations, contacts, account, …)? Why not unify them?

This was a hard decision and something we went back and forth on. But at the end of the day, we felt the safest thing we could do for now is to use a completely separate strong, random key. We're very aware of all the trade-offs involved, but this is where we landed.

tgsovlerkhgsel 3 days ago|||
Thank you for choosing the "strong random key" rather than "sketchy PIN+SGX" option. This decision recovered my trust in Signal after the previous Signal PIN fiasco.
codethief 4 days ago|||
> Nope! It's very much incremental :)

That's great to hear, thanks so much!

wooptoo 4 days ago|||
I'm assuming the backup format uses a container (like Veracrypt volumes), which grows in size forever, and cannot be backed up incrementally. I ran into the same issue when backing up loopback LUKS volumes. An elegant solution in this case was switching to Gocryptfs which encrypts each file individually, but then can mount the entire folder as a whole with fuse. This means only modified files need to be synchronised to the remote.
highwind 4 days ago||
I'm guessing the same reason why my house's front door and back door use different keys.
tymscar 4 days ago|||
Most likely they have different keys for absolutely no other reason than the fact that they were bought/made separately. I honestly would prefer to have a single key to my building.
nimchimpsky 4 days ago|||
[dead]
elevation 4 days ago||
I moved phones before Signal backups were available. My old phone has years of Signal chat and photo history. I can scroll through the conversations, but since I activated Signal on my new phone, my old phone will not let me export a backup any longer. Is there a safe sequence of operations to let me recover the data?
codethief 4 days ago|
Couldn't you re-register your old phone temporarily, just for the purpose of taking the backup¹, and later re-register your current phone? (In fact, once your old phone is registered, turn on airplane mode, and you should be able to re-register your current phone right away without affecting your old phone and the backup you're making there.)

Alternatively, would it be an option to get a throwaway number you could register your old phone under?

Finally, once you have the backup, use something like https://github.com/bepaald/signalbackup-tools to merge your old phone's backup with your current phone's backup, and then reinstall Signal on your current phone from that merged backup. (Disclaimer: I have never actually done this before but signalbackup-tools has been around for a long time and the developer seems to be very responsive.)

¹) I'm talking about the traditional way of backing up Signal conversation data to an encrypted archive here, not the feature discussed in the OP.

georgeck 4 days ago||
It would be really useful to have more client-side control over media storage. That way, I could better manage storage growth without wiping entire threads.

For example, being able to see all media across chats, sort by file size, and optionally group by conversation would make it much easier to clean things up.

chimeracoder 4 days ago||
> It would be really useful to have more client-side control over media storage. That way, I could better manage storage growth without wiping entire threads.

> For example, being able to see all media across chats, sort by file size, and optionally group by conversation would make it much easier to clean things up.

I have good news for you: this already exists.

On Android:

Settings >> Data and Storage >> Manage Storage >> Review Storage

This allows you to view all of your media, files, and audio across all chats, sorted by the amount of storage used. You can also delete those files individually without affecting the rest of the chat.

You can also do the same thing within a conversation.

mfsch 4 days ago|||
The issue I have with this is that it deletes the whole message, not just the media. In WhatsApp, you can delete media from the images/video folders and the messages remain in the conversation, they even still have the blurry preview iirc. In Signal, you end up with gaps in your history instead.
georgeck 4 days ago||||
Thanks, that’s helpful.

I’m also hoping similar media management options are available on iOS and desktop, since I use Signal across devices.

By the way, does Signal treat synced devices (like desktop or a second phone) as “replicas” vs a “primary”? If so, does this affect how storage or message history is handled between them?

Would appreciate any insight from folks familiar with the technical side of this!

wpollock 4 days ago|||
On my Samsung: Settings >> Device Care >> Storage
ThePowerOfFuet 4 days ago|||
Does that give you per-attachment insight?
codethief 4 days ago|||
I think you're talking about Android settings, though, not Signal settings?
sir_brickalot 4 days ago||
To your point: What I am missing with Signal:

Choice to always store media locally on the phone.

What I miss with most messenger apps: Archiving old stuff and offload it to a remote device.

Right now Signal is 8GB in size and doesn't stop growing.

oxalorg 4 days ago||
Creating signal backups for iPhone users is _really_ hard. The only way to do it is to get a backup from the Signal Desktop app, which is also non-trivial because in recent versions of the desktop the decrypt key is also encrypted and store in keychain.

I had to install sqlcipher, find my encrypted key stored locally, find the decrypt key in apple's keychain, decrypt it using Signal's format, etc. This took a lot of trial and error, and reading a lot of existing source (special thanks to https://github.com/bepaald/get_signal_desktop_key_mac but unfortunately it did not work OOTB for me)

gardnr 4 days ago|
I am happy to see Signal charging for premium features.

From a product perspective, being able to switch between two iOS devices without a 3rd iOS device shouldn’t be a premium feature.

Please consider enabling local backup and restore for a single Signal instance on iOS.

palata 4 days ago|
> being able to switch between two iOS devices without a 3rd iOS device

I have moved Signal from an iOS device to a new iOS device multiple times. Why do you need a 3rd one?

gardnr 4 days ago||
I have two phone numbers.
palata 4 days ago||
On the same iOS device? I didn't know that iPhones supported multiple SIMs!
gardnr 3 days ago|||
Yeah! You can have many eSIMs, but the iPhone only has two radios, so only two SIMs can be "active" (connected to towers) at any time.

Signal doesn't support multiple phone numbers on the same device. I have two phones:

1. Old iPhone: +55-555-5555

2. New iPhone: +1-867-5309

I would prefer to have the numbers swapped on the devices. There isn't a way to do this without "transferring"[1] the messages to a 3rd iOS device.

This is an awkward edge-case that would be ameliorated by allowing local file backup / restore.

https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/360007059752-Ba...

palata 3 days ago||
> This is an awkward edge-case that would be ameliorated by allowing local file backup / restore.

Feels like it would be better to support multiple phone numbers on the same device. But yeah... that's work and probably not a super common use-case.

Y-bar 3 days ago|||
It's eSIM: https://support.apple.com/en-gb/119606
palata 3 days ago||
Still, didn't know it was possible to have multiple numbers on the same iPhone :D
gardnr 3 days ago||
It's been a very pro-user development. You can buy an eSIM using an app these days. So when you travel, you can just download an eSIM for the country you are visiting if your home provider doesn't offer competitive international packages.
palata 3 days ago||
I must have been living under a rock, I didn't know that.

So you're saying that I can buy a cheap eSIM for just a couple weeks in a country? Don't they require to verify my identity and all that?

AnonC 3 days ago|||
Identity verification depends on the country. In certain cases there may be limitations. There are many eSIM sellers, like Airalo, Jetpac, Saily, Holafly and more. You can buy the eSIM with an eSIM package (for data, mostly, but some also sell voice/SMS) for a country or region, activate it (or wait for it to activate when the phone connects to a local network at the destination) and use it.

It’s so simple and convenient. Once you’ve returned back, you don’t necessarily have to delete the eSIM from the device. The iPhone models that have had eSIM support allow you to have a total of eight eSIMs on the device. You can activate (i.e., turn on) only two lines at any point in time.

So even if you have two numbers where you live, you can turn one off, use that slot and turn on your travel eSIM and then later switch back.

All the eSIM sellers provide clear and detailed instructions on how to install and activate the eSIM.

palata 2 days ago||
That's really cool! I'll try that next time I travel in a different country instead of buying an expensive data package to my provider!!!
gardnr 3 days ago|||
I don’t know how it works but I would guess that the KYC stuff happens with the resellers (who make the apps). So the resellers have some due diligence of identity verification then they make some guarantees to the telcos. Otherwise, it would be a vector for scams and crime.
More comments...