Top
Best
New

Posted by LorenDB 4 days ago

No adblocker detected(maurycyz.com)
613 points | 377 commentspage 3
noam_k 4 days ago|
Can anyone explain why the ID of the div is modified?
kelnos 4 days ago|
Because the -hidden variant is styled "display: none".
jojobas 4 days ago||
I was wondering why I don't see such a for a second.
NoSalt 4 days ago||
Make a Pi-hole ... you will not regret it.
61j3t 3 days ago||
The close button isn't working
initself 4 days ago||
There's no hope anymore of a solution.
aaron695 4 days ago||
[dead]
throwaway290 4 days ago||
[flagged]
b3lvedere 4 days ago||
Why do corporations/publishers feel entitled that people feed them as much (personal) information as possible via invasive ads, even when these people did not consent to that?

Businesses should really stop complaining the consumer is the problem here. The businesses made this model and expected consumers to gladly accept it. Don't want people to consume your content for free? Make it a subscription or something. Can't get enough subscribers to be profitable? We're so so sorry...

Same with cookies. Don't want the mandatory-by-law cookie popups? Stop using cookies.

throwaway290 4 days ago||
a guy makes a website and publishes useful stuff and wants to make money, not feed your personal information. if you feel it's wrong, make an ad platform that doesn't feed personal information. if you feel any ads and profit are wrong then clearly I'm talking to a communist. if you feel like the only answer is paywalls instead of ads then I'd like to see how happy you would be if that was reality.

this is leeching on expense of people without adblocks who have to endure more ads thanks to people with adblocks, for the above mentioned information publisher to make the same money

lclc 4 days ago||
Why do you feel entitled to my bandwidth, disk space, and attention?
throwaway290 4 days ago||
??? You are the one visiting seeking information.

Visit it and pay with your bandwidth and attention or rob the guy who does the work of income that helps him do this work. Your choice

reactordev 4 days ago|
Instead of document.cookie consider document.localStorage since there’s verbiage around showing a notice on your site if you use cookies, etc, for tracking purposes. At least with local storage, you aren’t using cookies :P
Tarq0n 4 days ago||
The law doesn't care whether it's a cookie or an equivalent.
minitech 4 days ago|||
And this cookie isn’t for tracking purposes anyway, so doesn’t require a notice.
dheera 4 days ago|||
The "law" only applies if you live in the EU anyway.
DocTomoe 4 days ago||
See, this is where you are wrong. The law applies if you target people living in the EU (such as using one of the languages spoken within the EU. English applies thanks to Malta and Ireland. So does not explicitly removing tracking from EU IPs).

Whether it is technically enforceable in your particular case may be the question. But historically, it has been enforced outside the EU.

As you live in the Bay Area - the CCPA and the CPRA, which are similar in many ways and seem to require an opt-out mechanism (e.g. if you operate a commercial website with >100k devices accessing it during a year).

Talk to a lawyer, don't take advice from strangers on the internet.

dheera 4 days ago|||
> The law applies if you target people living in the EU

I disagree with this. Tencent WeChat targets the entire world, including people living in the EU. They do not follow GDPR.

Likewise, Facebook targets people living everywhere, including in China. They do not follow Chinese laws.

Hence, China sets up a firewall and blocks Facebook.

EU can set up a firewall too if they don't like something.

"Oh but EU doesn't do firewalls?" Not my problem. Tough luck. China, Iran, Turkey, Indonesia, all did it, you can too if you have beef with foreign websites.

But no, I do not need to follow EU law just because EU users use my thing. It's on them to firewall it if they don't like my website.

> CCPA and the CPRA

This is fine. I live in California, I need to follow California law, and I can choose to live somewhere else if I don't like it. What I'm not okay with is some distant jurisdiction thinking they can make laws that I "need" to follow.

joquarky 3 days ago|||
I hate the GDPR popups more than the ads because they make no fucking sense.

Why don't we have a browser flag that sends a request header telling the site our preference automatically so we can avoid these popups?

dheera 3 days ago||
What's even worse is that I have my browser set to block cookies on ALL sites by default and only enable them for a handful of sites that I login to.

This causes all the stupid GDPR popup sites to not "remember" my preferences because they ironically need to use a cookie to store the preference of declining cookies, so they appear again each time because my browser doesn't store that decline cookie between sessions.

maurycyz 3 days ago|||
Except it's not tracking. Remembering user preferences is the original goal of cookies, and doesn't come with any legal requirements.

The law is (paraphrasing) "You must use cookies or similar to be evil without permission". Advertising companies decided that instead of not being evil, they'd annoy users into giving permission.

account42 4 days ago||
How does this nonsense still get repeated in 2025?