This is gonna be a golden age for creative prototyping and memes, and absolutely horrible for information quality and trustworthiness of content.

So it seems like image generation/deepfake proliferation is pretty inevitable. I imagine we can't trust any image anymore (for e.g. identification verification purposes) unless it is done in person or otherwise notarized somehow. Is there a way (NFT-ish?) to "tag"/sign an image to say it was taken by an actual camera?

It can print code output as image as well. I don't think it will work for complex logic though. https://x.com/smusamashah/status/1961081534661685392

After looking at Cases 4, 9, 23, 33, and 61, I think it might be suited to take in several wide-angle pictures or photospheres or such from inside a residence, and output a corresponding floor plan schematic.

If anyone has examples, guides, or anything to save me from pouring unnecessary funds into those API credits just to figure out how to feed it for this kind of task, I'd really appreciate sharing.

Cute. I love the “Not backed by [Y]” badge in one of the source images, sweet irony of being on HN’s front page.

Has anybody ever connected a 3D printer to such a machine’s output? Some of the action figures should definitely be 3D-printed.

I didn't try it but I've seen really good results, is some innovation going on under the hood that we don't know? Is the technology the same of similar models? I can't find technical info on the internet

Does the Nano Banana naming imply the existence of Regular Banana or even Mega Banana?

In the AI image generation scene, is there anything solid yet in the way of generating vector illustrations for apps?

GitHub should be so ashamed that the back button no longer works and jumps to top of page.

They should have learned what do in SPA 101