Top
Best
New

Posted by tcumulus 13 hours ago

Models of European metro stations(stations.albertguillaumes.cat)
590 points | 117 comments
decimalenough 10 hours ago|
Here's a zoomable 3D model of the world's busiest train station, Shinjuku in Tokyo:

https://satoshi7190.github.io/Shinjuku-indoor-threejs-demo/

3.6 million passengers per day. Wikipedia:

The main East Japan Railway Company (JR East) station and the directly adjacent private railways have a total of 35 platforms, an underground arcade, above-ground arcade and numerous hallways with another 17 platforms (52 total) that can be accessed through hallways to five directly connected stations without surfacing outside. The entire above/underground complex has well over 200 exits.

numpad0 9 hours ago||
Throwing in Japan into random topics in trains feel somewhat unfair. Most train fact sheets fail to include most Asian nations except Japan, often missing even Korea and Taiwan.

Commuter trains in many East/Southeast Asian cities like Shanghai has developed to levels comparable to Tokyo. Trains in some Central Asian cities such as Mumbai were also always notorious for congestions. I think those should also be considered more often and at greater depths, Fermi estimated if need be, than we would be just keep dropping random Shinjuku facts left and right.

decimalenough 7 hours ago|||
We have stats for India, and they're no match: Kolkata Howrah gets about 1M pax per day, Mumbai CST around 670k. Nothing to sneeze at, but still several million (!) less than Shinjuku.

China has numerous airport-sized stations that handle huge volumes of long-distance passengers, but I'm not aware of any single commuter hub remotely the size of Shinjuku. Partly this is because of the economic system: Chinese trains are all state-run and centralized, while a large part of why Shinjuku is so busy is that it's a hub for numerous private railways as well.

dmoy 2 hours ago||
> I'm not aware of any single commuter hub remotely the size of Shinjuku

There certainly isn't one that does the volume of passengers. Shanghai Hongqiao or Beijing South are probably busiest, and they're 3-4x less passengers than Shinjuku.

> Partly this is because of the economic system: Chinese trains are all state-run and centralized, while a large part of why Shinjuku is so busy is that it's a hub for numerous private railways as well.

I think another part of it is also size of network. China is a freaking huge country. It's got like 10-15x as much high speed rail track compared to Japan. It's a lot more distributed.

kaladin-jasnah 8 hours ago|||
Is India considered central Asia? I've always seen it referred to as south Asia, and former Soviet countries like Kazakhstan have been referred to as central Asia. I think India is east of these "central Asian" countries. Perhaps this is all a bit of pedantry.
numpad0 7 hours ago||
I was mistaken, I meant to say South Asia. Central was more like north of India/China...
kaladin-jasnah 7 hours ago|||
Ah, I see. I was curious since I guess you can refer to it as central Asia since it's west of east Asia, haha.
62 3 hours ago|||
[dead]
seabass-labrax 2 hours ago|||
Is this actually to scale? If so, do the near-vertical moving dashed lines depict inclined lifts or escalators? Because they look very steep when you compare them to other metro escalators, such as those in the Brussels Metro's Porte de Hal / Hallepoort station[1], which seem closer to 50° from horizontal.

[1]: http://estacions.albertguillaumes.cat/img/brusselles/porte_d...

bowsamic 8 hours ago|||
I’m really impressed at how usable that visualisation is on mobile. It’s also really great aesthetically. Japanese artists can still do the best sci fi designs about
raverbashing 4 hours ago|||
Yeah that makes Exit 8 looks like Child's play

Saint-Lazare being the most complex one that I saw personally (got lost, I mean)

giveita 9 hours ago|||
3.6m is crazy. That must be a decent % of the entire Tokyo pop.
kjkjadksj 1 hour ago||
Almost 10%. Framed like that it almost seems highly inefficient that so many are routed through this one station in particular. Presumably they could have had more direct routes to their destinations.
tkiolp4 9 hours ago||
If only 1% give money to homeless people, that’s… a good place to beg for money. I would probably make more there than what i make at my fancy software engineering job (100K before taxes per year):

- 36000 people

- let’s say each give 10 cents ($)

- that’s $3600 per day

- if you beg 8h per day, that’s $1200/day

- begging mon to fri means $24000 per month (tax free)

lm28469 9 hours ago|||
With 28800s in 8 hours that's more than 1 donation per second during these 8 hours. Also you now have 36000 10ct coins, that's more than 100kg in coins to move every day
apexalpha 9 hours ago||||
This assumes there is a central entrance you can situate yourself as a beggar.

In reality there are probably 10+ entrances.

Thorrez 7 hours ago||
> The entire above/underground complex has well over 200 exits.
initramfs 8 hours ago||||
very unrealistic because many train riders don't carry coins, nor will use a contactless payment to pay a random begger, even if they see them on the platform every day.
smcl 8 hours ago||||
This is hilarious, thank you
Mona4000 6 hours ago|||
Begging is illegal in Japan.
kjkjadksj 1 hour ago|||
It is illegal in all kinds of places. The question is not the letter of the law but if police enforce the law.
62 3 hours ago|||
[dead]
diggan 7 hours ago||
This is amazing, seems really detailed and leveraging official sources too, nice job!

Since the author seems to be Catalan, I'll shamelessly plug a Metro-station-relevant event that is ongoing right now in Barcelona:

There are many "ghost" metro stations in Barcelona that been popular (at least used to) urban exploring destinations. Two of those, Gaudí and Correus, are now opening to the public via tours, if you register at https://obrimelmetro.cat

I've only visited Gaudí in a unofficial capacity like a decade ago, and haven't yet done the new tours myself so can't vouch how interesting they are, but seems there are only 5000 open spots in total. It seems like one of the tours is even during the night, so you get as close to the urban exploring experience as possible without having to run across active train tracks :)

qweiopqweiop 4 hours ago|
Thanks for sharing. London has these permanently, and while not cheap, they're very much worth it too.
62 2 hours ago||
I agree
sschueller 10 hours ago||
Wow, very nice project.

The ones in Zürich are not actually metro stations. They where built to be, but then the city voted against a metro. The stations that were already built were converted into tram stations. There where some complications like that fact the the tram is almost too tall to fit. The pantograph is almost fully compressed when the tram enters the tunnel.

The trams also switch to the left side as the doors are only one side.

[1] https://cdn.dreso.com/fileadmin/_processed_/0/3/csm_Tierspit...

[2] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tramtunnel_Milchbuck%E2%80%93S... [DE]

EDIT: spelling

shlip 10 hours ago||
I think you meant a pantograph instead of a photograph ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantograph_(transport)

sschueller 9 hours ago||
Yes, it got autocorrected. Thanks
rwmj 10 hours ago|||
I'd love to know why you'd vote against having a metro.
joshvm 10 hours ago|||
Zurich does pretty well with light rail, trams and buses. Public transport is very good there. Two more reasons are that the city isn't that big, so you're in easy walking distance of some sort of connection, and the terrain isn't ideal. A good chunk of the population live up steep hills which are well-served by the tram system. The airport is also very well-connected by bus/tram/rail, and only 10-15 minutes to the centre.

That said, I would have loved to see HBf on this website.

coderatlarge 9 hours ago|||
i remember visiting zurich once and standing at a light rail station when the next train was one minute overdue and all the people waiting were looking at their watches in total disbelief and consternation. warms my sla-minded heart :)
izacus 8 hours ago|||
One of the most mind blowing things for me was seeing that river Sihl flows through Hbf between the tracks.
kmarc 7 hours ago|||
To be precise it flows above (and under) the tracks, as in, perpendicular, not "in between" parallel tracks.

BTW Hbf is a München thing, we call our beloved Zürich Hauptbahnhof just HB :-)

murermader 8 hours ago|||
Can you explain where? Which tracks?

I have seen this comment on Reddit a few months ago, and some people were talking about it. They came to the conclusion that you cannot see the Sihl.

sschueller 7 hours ago||
It's between the underground tracks of Bahnhof Löwenstrasse and the above ground: [1]

There are a lot of little neat things. For example the elevators go sideways [2] because the platform in the underground Bahnhof is wider (this is due to safety regulations etc.) [3]

BTW, what is marked as Stadttunnel in [1] is the new bike tunnel [4] which has actually been there for many years as it was supposed to be a highway tunnel but was never opened (built many, many years ago).

[1] https://img.nzz.ch/2014/05/30/1.18312867.1401474596.jpg

[2] https://www.standseilbahnen.ch/images/8000/8000.06-zuerich-h...

[3] https://implenia.com/fileadmin/implenia.com/referenzen/durch...

[4] https://www.stadt-zuerich.ch/content/dam/web/de/mobilitaet/v...

sschueller 10 hours ago||||
Costs, existing infrastructure and alternatives (S-Bahn was extended) and fears that the local businesses above would loose foot traffic if people are no longer traveling above ground with the trams.
murermader 8 hours ago||||
I really like urban places with public transport on the street. It leads to less cars and more pedestrian friendly streets. Also I think for small distances (Zürich is not that big), I rather ride a bit longer with the tram than going down to a deep metro station, especially in hilly places.
arccy 10 hours ago||||
with sufficient density and priority on roads, a tram network might be better, other than having to wait outside in bad weather
scottgg 9 hours ago||||
The public transport coverage especially with tram in Zürich is already amazing
speed_spread 8 hours ago|||
Because talk radio stations of your city are funded by ads for local car dealers and the show hosts constantly dump on public transportation projects. For example, Quebec City.
floam 7 hours ago||
I don’t think that’s the causal relationship. Even if the stakeholders were purely the listeners: radios are in cars. Basically all the radio listeners aren’t just drivers they are driving.
izacus 10 hours ago|||
Huh, I wondered why Tierspital station is so strange. TIL!
rsynnott 10 hours ago||
> The trams also switch to the left side as the doors are only one side.

... Wait, what? That seems like a serious false economy...

fredoralive 9 hours ago|||
Buses also have the doors only on one side usually, if you're just running trams on the surface in traffic you'll probably only need them on the pavement side of the vehicle. It's just got weird in this case the assumption the choice was made on changed after they already had a fleet.
rsynnott 4 hours ago||
Feels like you're limiting your options quite significantly, though. It's not just underground; elevated trams will often have island stops, and even street-level ones do sometimes.
hamdingers 5 hours ago||||
A set of crossovers has a high upfront cost, but compare to the added seating capacity on every tram car every day for decades and it doesn't seem so bad.
nemetroid 6 hours ago|||
Same in Gothenburg. There's a single underground station, with the platform in the middle, so the trams need to cross over. Another underground station is planned, but it will have the tracks in the middle instead.
rossant 9 hours ago||
This guy has spent the last 10 years drawing about 2,547 stations around the world and making 3D models available to everyone. This might be the most amazing thing I have ever seen on the internet. Kudos.
bambax 11 hours ago||
This is insane. Never saw anything like it.

One minor nitpick: zooming the map is very slow (maybe Leaflet is not the best choice?). And the main station in Paris is missing: Châtelet-Les Halles.

Other than that, incredible work!! Amazing.

diiiimaaaa 10 hours ago||
Leaflet should easily handle stuff like this if configured correctly. OP just slaps 3000 markers in a single layer, and each of them is an image element in dom. Should probably use some marker clustering for that.
benoitg 11 hours ago|||
Châtelet is there, you have to click on the 3D icon to experience the full majesty of its unending corridors in 3D
tcumulus 11 hours ago|||
There even is a section on Chatelet Les Halles if you scroll down. Insane station.
bambax 2 hours ago|||
Indeed it is, I don't know how I missed it the first time!
guilamu 11 hours ago||
Zooming working perfectly on my galaxy s23.

Also, Châtelet les Halles is available just after 'Château d'eau".

tannhaeuser 8 hours ago||
Jungfernstieg station in Hamburg has its own app to navigate out of the labyrinth even, with (I suppose) official 3D model data [1].

[1]: https://zaubar.com/app?url=zaubar.dev/hochbahn?scene=010

Anduia 28 minutes ago||
This again? The site is from 2012, does not use https, and has not changed since it was posted last time (7 times already)
MarcelOlsz 22 minutes ago|
Perfect.
walterlw 10 hours ago||
Very impressive work. Was very saddened to see how Ukrainian Kyiv and Kharkiv stations were excluded. We have deep stations (like Arsenal'na at 105m that connects directly to the above-ground Dnipro station on a river bank), we have both Soviet-made and new stations. Also now they are doubly essential being used for both transportation and shelter during air raids by millions.
rjsw 9 hours ago|
Why make it easier for an enemy to plan an attack on them.
pessimizer 8 hours ago|||
Reading comments like yours makes me wonder what kind of mental model of the world some people are working with. Russia does not need HN comments to tell them where train stations are.
StopDisinfo910 6 hours ago|||
It’s highly likely that Russia already has detailed models of every stations in Ukraine. If they didn’t before the war, they do now. Mapping public infrastructure doesn’t require a lot of spying.

But you have to understand that information control during war requires a shift of mindset. It’s better to start controlling everything which could be used by the enemy even if they probably already have it than try to establish complex rules. It gives good habits to people.

konart 5 hours ago||||
Most, if not all, of the stations were build during Soviet times. Russia have the original maps of most of them.
baubino 8 hours ago|||
Of course they know where the stations are. But they don’t necessarily know the precise local of all the underground tunnels, exits, mechanical rooms, equipment, etc. The underground network is far more complex than what the consumer map hanging on the wall in the station shows.
diggan 7 hours ago||
During the Cold War, Russia managed to map huge parts of the world, sometimes with higher quality and more accurate measurements than the countries themselves! Especially noteworthy considering that some of those countries (like the UK) were trying their hardest to prevent those sort of maps being made in the first place, yet the Russians ended up with better maps of the UK than UK themselves.

Considering that that happened decades ago, I'm guessing their (and others) capability of doing those sort of things have only improved, not gotten worse. But that's just me guessing.

walterlw 3 hours ago||
I'd like to remind you that Russia is not the USSR. Surely the technology has significantly improved since, but some capabilities are definitely lost. One example is them not being able to build more strategic bombers.
baubino 8 hours ago||||
This is why agencies don’t published detailed plans (only schematics) of train stations and airports. I learned this when working on a project for the New York subway in the early 2000s.
moffkalast 9 hours ago|||
Surely they already have detailed schematics? The USSR had a mapping project of hilarious scale: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bqzwsM6eoQ
jddj 11 hours ago||
Very impressive work.

I also learned something, which I'd always wondered cynically but never thought to investigate. The walking connection between lines at some stations in Barcelona seems so long as to not make sense, but it's explained here that at the time the different lines and stations were dug and extended independently by different companies.

> Among the reasons for having such long corridors [in Barcelona] is the lack of planning or the vision of the metro network as a bunch of individual lines. As an example: line 1 and line 4 were extended to Urquinaona in 1932, but both lines were not connected until 1972, as they were originally operated by different companies.

FearNotDaniel 9 hours ago||
In London that’s also mostly true due to the patchwork history of different companies building different lines… however when King’s Cross/St Pancras was redeveloped a few years ago the “official” interchange route between Piccadilly and Victoria lines became much, much longer - minutes of walking compared to seconds. This site doesn’t cover that station, but does link to TfL’s own diagrams via IanVisits, and the reason is clear: at one end the platforms of both lines are almost touching - and I believe that shortcut staircase is still there if you ignore the signs and know where to find it - but the tourist friendly route is much more circuitous, going up to the mainline station and back again. I assume it helps to relieve congestion in an extremely busy station, I remember more than one occasion when they just have to close entry to the platforms during rush hour due to overcrowding.
anticensor 1 hour ago||
Why don't they block the shortcut to anyone but whitelisted people that applied beforehand?
bambax 2 hours ago||
That was also the case in NYC, and that's why there are so many long tunnels: each company tried to reach customers where they were.
Zagreus2142 1 hour ago|
This is so neat! I hope at some point in the future cities and/or nation-states provide real time 3d environments of their built environment, with highlights for public transit, public spaces, food, government services, etc. Like if gis systems were better standardized and have these models integrated into them.

Seattle has been a mess of last minute bus stop changes that aren't propagated to Google maps before you find yourself missing your bus. And even checking the metro page directly sometimes isn't up to date with sudden construction closures

More comments...