Top
Best
New

Posted by AndrewDucker 5 days ago

ChatGPT's Atlas: The Browser That's Anti-Web(www.anildash.com)
762 points | 329 commentspage 6
kwa32 1 day ago|
how is this different from just training on your history
mediumsmart 1 day ago||
this website is mentioned best on Atlas Browser 25A362 in 1920x1080 resolution
dyauspitr 1 day ago||
Eh I use ChatGPT for so many things I realize how many projects I used to just let go by.
r_singh 1 day ago|
Me too, and as the number and maturity of my projects have grown, improving and maintaining them all together has become harder by a factor I haven’t encountered before
andy_ppp 1 day ago||
Another edition of “if it’s free you are their product”…
r_singh 1 day ago|
It’s not entirely free though, agent mode and a few other features are paid. I’m paying OpenAI $200/mo for my subscription
khtbunkncbuc 1 day ago||
[dead]
wilg 1 day ago||
1 - nobody cares about being "pro-web" or "anti-web"

2 - we didn't leave command-line interfaces behind 40 years ago

gjvc 1 day ago||
I want to hear more garbage like this. Do you have a website?
Grimblewald 1 day ago||
1 - I care

2 - That's an entirely different situation and you know it.

maxdo 1 day ago||
Every professional involved in saas, web , online content creation thinks the web is a beautiful thing.

In reality the fact of social media means web failed long time ago, and it only serves a void not taken by mobile apps , and now llm agents.

Why do I need to read everything about tailor Swift on you her web site , if I don’t know a single song of her ? ( I actually do ) .

I don’t want a screaming website tells me about her best new album ever , and her tours if LLM knows I don’t like pop music . The other way around if you like her you’d like a different set of information. Website can do that for you

ec109685 1 day ago|
OpenAI should be 100% required to rev share with content creators (just like radio stations pay via compulsory licenses for the music they play), but this is a weird complaint:

> “sometimes this tool completely fabricates content, gives me a box that looks like a search box, and shows me the fabricated content in a display that looks like a web page when I type in the fake search box”

If a human wrote that same article about Taylor Swift, would you say it completely fabricates content? Most “articles” on the web are just rewrites of someone else’s articles anyway and nobody goes after them as bad actors (they should).