Posted by ndhandala 10/29/2025
The story will be different for every business because every business has different needs.
Given the answer to "How much did migration and ongoing ops really cost?" it seems like they had an incredibly simple infrastructure on AWS, and it was really easy to move out. If you use a wider-range of services the cost savings are much more likely to cancel themselves.
Assuming this is indeed all they used, this was admittedly nonsense, they were essentially using cloud-based bare-metal.
I thought there would be a greater unbundling to AWS or to cheaper providers but it seems like a good-sized portion of the market is just going back to managing their own hardware.
I build my own NAT instances from Debian Trixie with Packer. The configuration is literally a few lines:
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ens5 -j MASQUERADE
sudo iptables -F FORWARD
sudo iptables -A FORWARD -i ens5 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -A FORWARD -o ens5 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables-save | sudo tee /etc/iptables/rules.v4 > /dev/nullreference : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38294569
I understand that with AWS you cannot do that as it is often seem as opex.
I guess thats a good enough motivation to move out of AWS at scale.
Click on the various catastrophic issues. Observe how many are closed with no resolution. Canonical is great but Microk8s is not.