Top
Best
New

Posted by chris_overseas 10/31/2025

S.A.R.C.A.S.M: Slightly Annoying Rubik's Cube Automatic Solving Machine(github.com)
278 points | 57 commentspage 2
aEJ04Izw5HYm 11/1/2025|
The personality of creator really shines through in the software. Douglas Adams would be pleased, I hope loads of hackers will be inspired to make more 'Adamsian' robots.
moffkalast 11/1/2025|
I'm looking forward to more genuine people personalities from Unsirious Cybernetics.
cellular 11/1/2025||
This looks like a good place to ask HN:

I've started with a solved cube, then turned 2 sides sharing an edge, alternatively (same direction) expecting the cube to get messed up but then returning to its solved state.

It never got solved! Maybe i didn't do it enough (i did it hundreds of times i think). Has anyone got an explanation?

JonathanMerklin 11/1/2025||
The cyclic group generated by e.g. RU has order 105 (so 210 total turns or 105 of each side, alternated). If you have some math know-how, check out [1]. If you don't, take my word for it: when I was a teenager playing around with cubes, I once had a similar experience trying to do the same thing you did - when I went relatively quickly it never returned to the solved state, but when I was very deliberate about each turn, I got the 105 result (not by counting back then, but by rough time estimate given the figure I just looked up). Both you and I probably accidentally threw in one or more double-turns (like a U2) in there, or undercounted and gave up well before the cycle had completed (I, too, had thought I'd made "hundreds" of moves).

[1] https://faculty.etsu.edu/gardnerr/4127/algebra-club/rubik-ta... - slide 41

rokicki 11/1/2025|||
It should take 105 repetitions:

https://alpha.twizzle.net/explore/?alg=%28U+R%29105

Unless by "same direction" you mean "opposite direction", in which case 63 works:

https://alpha.twizzle.net/explore/?alg=%28U+R%27%2963

avandekleut 11/3/2025||
It takes something like 60 turns or so in my experience. you probably messed up while doing it.
slug 11/1/2025||
I built a cubotino a few years ago, similar mechanism, see https://github.com/AndreaFavero71/cubotino

Uses a rpi 2 w, works well, can solve and scramble 3x3x3 cubes, using just 2 servo motors.

dugidugout 11/1/2025||
The screen ui aestetic and audio (specifically the dubbing) remind me of the silver case series, may be a total reach, nice touches none the less!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Silver_Case

wilg 11/1/2025||
It's a cool project, but also they're really underselling the amount of work put in to make it annoying.
optimiz3 11/1/2025||
Impressive work. Curious to how many hours of labor what the development path was. Several man-years possibly?
stavros 11/1/2025||
This is fantastic, how did it not get confused by the blue logo on the cube in the video?
trenchpilgrim 11/1/2025|
Western cubes always have white opposite yellow. Japanese cubes always have white opposite blue. (The center piece on each side can be considered "fixed" relative to all moves.)
stavros 11/1/2025||
Ahh right, I forgot the center piece defines the face color, thanks.
branon 11/1/2025|
Pedantic pet peeve: it'd be S.A.R.C.A.S.M. or SARCASM but not S.A.R.C.A.S.M

You are missing the last full stop, unless your project is actually meant to be called "S.A.R.C.A.S. M"

An initialism either uses full stops after all letters or none of them.

More comments...