Posted by bookofjoe 11/1/2025
Artificial skin has the potential for better temporary wound cover, and ideally, it can promote healing without skin grafting or using less skin for grafting.
Characterizing as grossly inappropriate the statement of the reality of the monopoly on research funding on useless -as of now- AI and not even addressing the initial point is very telling of your dedication to VC brainwashing.
Your judgement concerning the state of the website since the release of GPT3 is flawed. Just take a look at the amount of comments on non-AI topics like the current one. Not counting yours truly, it's a very low volume conversation for a website for the discussion of stories that are intellectually interesting.
3 of the current top 25 articles (at the time of this comment) are about something AI related (ChatGPT 5.1, Marble and JSX Tool). It's all relatively low volume, it's just never ending is the problem.
However, on that note, as of writing this, the GPT 5.1 submission on the front page has 471 comments. The submission about pennies no longer being minted has 853.
Oh wait what is that?!
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45917875
Another low volume slop news day! Maybe I'm more influential than I previously thought..
Yes, we shouldn't be pointing out the low-value content and enshittification brought upon by this superior technology, or even question why isn't research focused on addressing challenges like disease and poverty eradication, cause we bring more attention to any potential negative aspects, which are obviously very minimal and exaggerated. We should just accept dogmata about having to reconcile with the idea that humans have eventually lost in some absurd creativity/imagination race against the superior AGI machines and it's perfectly reasonable having negative IQ CEOs laying off thousands because AI does their job "better" (costs cheaper) than them. I'm sure paying no attention and magically letting it die on its own is the solution. Just like it has historically happened with other subjects like phrenology, scientific racism, antisemitism etc.
What are you even doing here, enjoy another trite useless application offered to you as another breakthrough that I'm obviously responsible for having 1.5K upvotes cause I can't shut up.
> The real slop is dragging AI into every conversation.
By all means - debate AI in an AI thread or make thread about how much AI sucks and discuss it there. Just don't insist on bringing AI into even more places it shouldn't be as if that's going to solve the very problem of AI discussion being too common to avoid! It's easy enough to avoid an entire AI thread and its hundreds of comments at a glance but, thanks to people like you who don't respect the point of separating discussions of different topics into different places, it's impossible to feel you can go read something and know you'll avoid hearing about how great/horrible AI is in ANY conversation! 100% possibility annoyance in any place on HN sure is a lot worse to deal with than seeking out and posting links just to show actually easy to avoid annoyance is not exactly 0%.
This is why you're continued use of additional links to more AI trite in this thread is so ironic/opposing to the goal, not because I think AI needs fewer critics pointing things out in the relevant discussions.
Maybe it was "spray on skin", an alternative approach?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spray-on_skin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avita_Medical#ReCell,_spray-on...