Top
Best
New

Posted by sshh12 11/2/2025

How I use every Claude Code feature(blog.sshh.io)
534 points | 188 commentspage 4
hendry 11/2/2025|
"All my stateless tools (like Jira, AWS, GitHub) have been migrated to simple CLIs." - How do you get Jira on the CLI?
rererereferred 11/2/2025||
There's an Atlasian cli with Jira support https://developer.atlassian.com/cloud/acli/reference/command...
greymalik 11/2/2025||
Cloud only. My employer is still on an ancient data center version. But you can easily write a cli that wraps the REST API.
RMPR 11/2/2025|||
Jiratui[0] has some support for basic automation. That's probably what OP is using as it is the most poppular Jira cli tool out there.

0: https://github.com/whyisdifficult/jiratui

PhilippGille 11/2/2025|||
First search result (on Kagi): https://github.com/ankitpokhrel/jira-cli

Latest version from 2 momths ago, >4700 stars on GitHub

mewpmewp2 11/2/2025||
At some point I vibecoded myself everything into cli commands, anything that has API could be a cli command.
vladsh 11/2/2025||
Or use this solution and get fine-tuned context generated for each and every task just-in-time : devly.ai

Please stop expecting every engineer on the team to be an ai engineer just to get started with coding agents

wahnfrieden 11/2/2025||
Why are so many still using CC and not Codex
nostrebored 11/2/2025||
If you have no modifications or customization of Claude code then it comes down to a preference for proactivity (codex) or a bit more restraint.

If you are using literally any of Claude Code’s features the experience isn’t close, and regardless of model preference (Claude is my least favorite model by far) you should probably use Claude code. It’s just a much more extensible product for teams.

wahnfrieden 11/2/2025||
Which features are preferable to higher quality output?

Losing access to GPT 5 Pro is also a big hit… it is by far the best for reading full files/repos and creating plans (though it also by far has the worst out of the box tooling)

lopatin 11/2/2025|||
CC has better agent tools and is faster. The ability to switch from plan mode to execution mode and back is huge. Toggling thinking also. And of course they are innovating all of these agentic features like MCP, sub-agents, skills, etc...

Codex writes higher quality code, but is slower and less feature rich. I imagine this will change within months. The jury is still out. Exciting times!

wahnfrieden 11/2/2025||
I guess I don’t understand wanting faster and worse for much work, and some of the features like subagents are dubious or like skills and planning mode are minor conveniences over skill files mentioned by agents.md and toggling read only mode or using a plan file. After all those latter features are just conveniences for assembling context.

Maybe CC users haven’t figured out how to parallelize their work because it’s fast enough to just wait or be distracted, and so the Codex waiting seems unbearable.

lopatin 11/2/2025||
A lot of the time the code that needs to be written isn't something that requires an extremely powerful model.
mewpmewp2 11/2/2025|||
I use both at the same time. CC seems to have better access to web and researching capabilities compared to Codex. Maybe I'm not using Codex right or missing something, but it has frequent troubles browsing internet. Also Claude Code is faster. So I use it when I know it can handle the task.
cpursley 11/2/2025|||
Both. Codex MCP within CC as a second brain. Best of both worlds.
danielrm26 11/2/2025||
Ecosystem features and cohesion.
wahnfrieden 11/2/2025||
What features are preferable to better output quality? (Since you didn’t mention output quality as superior)
abacadaba 11/2/2025||
right on. i usually just tell it "hey go update this function to do [x]" in horribly misspelled english and then yell at it until it does it right
BonoboIO 11/2/2025|
Sometimes I write with Claude in English and German mixed with really bad typos and it’s amazing how well it works.
adastra22 11/2/2025|||
When touch typing and talking to someone, I accidentally typed something to claude with my fingers off the home row, e.g. ttoubg kuje tgus ubti tge ckayde cide ternubak. Claude understood it just fine. Didn't even remark on it.
RAMJAC 11/2/2025||
It truly is an idiot savant. It's absurdly good, and then if there is any unaccounted complexity, ugh let's just make the tests stubs.... tests pass now.
triyambakam 11/2/2025||||
Ja find ich auch schön schreckliches Denglisch mit Claude zu reden.
Keyframe 11/2/2025|||
wait until you start conversing with it. It's been a game changer for me how I use Claude CLI. It suits my workflow fine since my sessions are intense in focus I have to bring and I iterate with it; I just haven't found _a way_ where I can give it a large thing to work on and that it will not deviate. I do one focused thing at a time, review, test, alter code and then repeat. With voice mode it's been great since I can talk with it while walking fast on a treadmill. It's bizarre, star trekish, and it works. I wish I could have a stop word with whisper, since I do tend to think long between sentences in this mode, and I wish I could stop it with voice while it's talking, but I found a flow that it doesn't matter that much.

I suggest everyone who can to try the voice mode. https://getvoicemode.com/

hanlho 11/3/2025||
Hans@lhoest.eu
selasa67118 11/2/2025||
[dead]
wetpaws 11/2/2025||
[dead]
IlikeMadison 11/2/2025||
Enshittification needs its Moore's law.
phplovesong 11/2/2025||
No thanks. I rather write the code myself that use generated slop. I actually like to code and see little benefit in other peoples copypaste code (thats essentially what ai slop is really)
larusso 11/2/2025|
I feel or have the fear that the world will tumble and crack under the sheer amount of code we produce and can’t be maintained because at one point no one human can understand all the stuff that was written.

At the moment though I also code on and off with an agent. I’m not ready or willing to only vibe code my projects. For one is the fact that I had tons of examples where the agent gaslighted me only to turn around at the last stage. And in some cases the code output was to result focused and didn’t think about the broader general usage. And sure that’s in part because I hold it wrong. Don’t specify 10million markdown files etc. But it’s a feedback loop system. If I don’t trust the results I don’t jump in deeper. And I feel a lot of developers have no issue with jumping ever deeper. Write MCPs now CLIs and describe projects with custom markdown files. But I think we really need both camps. Otherwise we don’t move forward.

exasperaited 11/2/2025||
> I feel or have the fear that the world will tumble and crack under the sheer amount of code we produce and can’t be maintained because at one point no one human can understand all the stuff that was written.

IMO the best advice in life is try not to be fearful of things that happen to everyone and you can't change.

Good news! What you are afraid of will happen, but it'll happen to everyone all at once, and nothing you can do can change it.

So you no longer need to feel fear. You can skip right on over to resignation. (We have cookies, for we are cooked)

nextworddev 11/2/2025|
Good article