Posted by meetpateltech 11/12/2025
Senses do not represent, if we needed them to in order to survive, we'd be dead before we never saw that branch, or that step, etc. This is the same mistaken approach cog-sci took in inventing the mind from the brain.
The problem is the whole brain prior to sensory and emotional integration is deeply involved so that an incredibly shallow oscillatory requirement fits atop the depth of long-term path-integration, memory consolidation involving allo and egocentric references of space and time, these are then correlated in affinities by sense emotion relays or values. None of this is here, it's all discarded for junk volumes made arbitrary, whereas the spaces here are immeasurably specific, fused by Sharp Wave Ripples.
There's no world model in the instantaneous shallow optic flow response (knowing when to slam on brakes, or pull in for a dive) and in the deep entanglements of memory and imagination and creativity.
This is one-size fits all nonsense. It's junk. It can't hope to resolve the space time requirements of shallow and deep experiences.
This is immensely useful tech for blocking out consistent scenes, eg. for video generation.
Beyond entertainment, this is going to be huge in the field of robotics.
I wish you could see what I see.
Edit: After seeing your edited (longer) comment, I have no idea what you’re talking about.
Edit - of course you have no idea, you have no grasp of the oscillatory-dynamic origins of consciousness, nor does it seem anyone in AI.
The idea that words and space are being conflated as a formula for spatial intelligence is fundamentally absurd as our relationships to space have no resolution, both within any one language and worse, between them, as language is arbitrary. Language and thought are entirely separate forms. Aphasia has proved this since 2016.
AI developers have to face the music, these impoverished gimmicks aren't even magic, they are bunk. And debunkable once compared to the sciences of the brain.
But actually most people should start with strong definitions. Consciousness, intelligence, and other adjacent terms have never been defined rigorously enough, even if a ton of philosophers think otherwise. These discussions always dance around ill-defined terms.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38579270/
And
https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262552820/the-spontaneous-brain...
Easily refute prediction or error prediction as fundamental.
The path to intelligence or consciousness isn’t mimicry of interpretation.
In terms of strong definitions, start at the base, coders: oscillation, dynamics, Topologies, sharp wave ripples, and I would say roughly 60 more strongly defined material units and processes. This reverse intuition is going nowhere and it’s pseudoscientific nonsense for social media timeline filling.
Look at Unlocking The brain both volumes, rhythms of the brain and the brain from inside out, and these are the tip.