Top
Best
New

Posted by koolba 13 hours ago

Larry Summers resigns from OpenAI board(www.cnbc.com)
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/19/technology/larry-summers-..., https://archive.ph/ASfq6
267 points | 259 comments
etc-hosts 36 minutes ago|
A nice list of Summers' many crimes from over 10 years ago:

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/07/why-larry-summers-sh...

7e 22 minutes ago||
What laws were broken here?
alex1138 29 minutes ago||
This comment (currently 5 minutes old) got immediately grey (not completely, but some)

HN, stop protecting your own. Stop downvoting legitimate posts

drivingmenuts 7 hours ago||
It’s interesting that only now he is stepping back now that he’s been found out. It demonstrates that it’s not about ethics or morals, but about publicity and damage control.
tbrownaw 2 hours ago||
How do we know that whoever asked him to step down already privately knew?
zem 5 hours ago|||
it's the good old eleventh commandment, "thou shalt not get caught"
egillie 6 hours ago|||
most of what we know today we knew years ago, too
bamboozled 5 hours ago|||
The tax paying class of the world just have to watch all this horseshit go on, watch the institutions and the law enforcement agencies protect these people with our hard earned money, meanwhile if we break a single law, there are consequences for us, sometimes massive.

It's a bullshit world we're living in, but I guess it's always been the same?

It seems for the wealthy, raping children is an acceptable pastime and we're just supposed to accept that it's ok?

malfist 2 hours ago|||
It's a big club, and we ain't in it.
hermitcrab 4 hours ago||||
"The big thieves hang the little thieves"
standardUser 4 hours ago||||
By most metrics, it's almost always been worse. But that doesn't make the modern era suck any less.
wahnfrieden 3 minutes ago|||
Not according to the metrics proposed by Graeber & Wengrow in the last chapter of Dawn of Everything

> The three freedoms that most of our ancestors enjoyed, but which most modern humans lack are:

> The freedom to leave.

> The freedom to disobey an order.

> The freedom to create new ways of relating to one another.

https://drdevonprice.substack.com/p/the-three-fundamental-hu...

stinkbeetle 3 hours ago|||
And would most of those metrics you allude to happen to have been brought to us by institutions like Harvard, or the US Treasury Department?
standardUser 35 minutes ago|||
I'm talking about disease prevention, maternal mortality, infant mortality, access to clean water, anesthetic(!!) and access to things like reading glasses and hearing aids and oh, I don't know, refrigeration.

What does your precious Harvard and US Treasury Department have to say about that?

Maxatar 2 hours ago|||
Brought to you by Steven Pinker, another one of Epstein's associates.
vkou 3 hours ago|||
> It's a bullshit world we're living in, but I guess it's always been the same?

> It seems for the wealthy, raping children is an acceptable pastime and we're just supposed to accept that it's ok?

This category of malcontent (about out-of-touch elites engaging in all sorts of depraved perversions while the poor starved) at Versailles eventually caused most of the former to lose their heads during the French Revolution.

The smart ones know that they need to keep up appearances, the dumb ones behave like they will never face consequences.

blendo 23 minutes ago|||
And the US never revolted against our domestic aristocracy, as they never revolted against our clergy.

Wonder how it would have turned out if the French revolution happened before the American Revolution? What could we have learned from them?

Loughla 2 hours ago|||
The smart ones are building bunkers to escape the hell that the US will become when the civil war actually starts. They're not hoping to survive the apocalypse, they're just hoping to ride out the 20 or 30 years of war and return as actual Lords for the serfs that are left after we kill each other.
nebula8804 7 minutes ago||
Yes I know of someone who willingly gave up their US citizenship for tax reasons but has EU, Israeli, and a bunch of other citizenships. They get to live a good life in the Netherlands + traveling the world while the US tears itself apart and then when it is time to retire in 30-40 years, the country will be ripe of the picking..they will buy their citizenship back through one of the multiple buy your way into the US visa programs...and retire in Montana.
naIak 4 hours ago||
I understand you want to highlight this, but you don’t have to begin your sentence with "It's interesting that..." because this is not interesting or novel in the slightest.
lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3 hours ago|||
You are entitled to your opinion and they theirs.
drivingmenuts 2 hours ago|||
It's interesting to me because how the hell did he think this was going to end? "Innocent until proven guilty" doesn't work in the court of public opinion. So, if one was even peripherally associated with Epstein, it would seem like that would be a hell of a liability.

On a side note, did Epstein have employees on his sex island and what happened to them?

squillion 12 hours ago||
Let's not forget that time he advocated for dumping toxic waste in poor countries.

"I think the economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable and we should face up to that."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summers_memo

llbbdd 9 hours ago||
I've never seen this before but I'm surprised anyone ever thought in good faith it wasn't tongue-in-cheek. I think one would have to have a cartoon-villain-tears-down-orphanage-to-build-mall view of how people work to not read the dripping tone in this memo.
sapphicsnail 8 hours ago|||
He was literally part of a ring of rich and powerful pedophiles who trafficked underage women.
llbbdd 8 hours ago||
Evil people can make jokes too, and mimicking the formal tone of an official document is a bit as old as time.
jonny_eh 5 hours ago|||
I'm not really in a charitable mood with this guy right now.
SequoiaHope 1 hour ago|||
I’m with you. Stuff that seems cartoonish to regular people does often seem to be serious from him.
llbbdd 14 minutes ago||
> Does often seem to be serious

Kind of what I mean. I hadn't heard of this guy before today, and this memo openly laments that it's challenging to bring Africa into the world pollution economy because moving solid waste there is a logistical challenge. If this memo was about how cool it is to traffic and rape children, as some people in this thread and a few others today seem to be interpreting it, I'd probably be less inclined to lend it the benefit of this tone, but I'm just not sold on the premise that someone who is demonstrably evil in some dimension is incapable of making honestly benign bureaucratic jokes in a presumably private context. It kind of knocks the legs out of genuine criticism if the dude can't chew bubblegum without taking flack.

llbbdd 19 minutes ago||||
I don't think it requires being charitable to acknowledge nuance.
naIak 4 hours ago|||
"I know I'm wrong, but still I have to double down on this to save face"
Supermancho 1 hour ago||
That wasn't the implication.
sapphicsnail 7 hours ago|||
It's certainly a possibility but I also wouldn't put it past him to advocate for something that evil.
llbbdd 4 minutes ago||
Sure but in the most polite way, that's almost saying nothing at all. I just think it kneecaps any real criticism and real issues associated with this guy to go "okay that might be a joke, but it probably isn't because <legitimate evil reason>". Though I guess it encroaches on the definition of what a joke is and if it's defined by intent. If he meant it as one, but nobody took it as one, is it?
throwthrowrow 3 hours ago||||
I read the memo. Maybe just me, but I don't see any indication that it was tongue in cheek.
squillion 8 hours ago||||
I'd only entertain the possibility that it was tongue-in-cheek if it came from someone critical of the World Bank and laissez-faire economics in general, for instance Joseph Stiglitz, who has also been chief economist at the World Bank and was critical of it. But if you're fine with structural adjustment – which many see as basically tear-down-orphanage-to-build-mall – you don't get to make that kind of jokes. It's too close to home.
llbbdd 2 minutes ago||
I mean this is presumably why it wasn't a publicly published memo or policy recommendation. If structural adjustment and economy management is part your job, you might have some steam to let off about it in private, and plenty of draft ideas and documents that need refinement. It does become a mistake when it's made public, but that doesn't mean it wasn't a joke originally.
stinkbeetle 2 hours ago||||
And yet that's exactly what he and his ilk have been doing ever since western countries began to demand workers' rights and environmental protections.
erikpukinskis 4 hours ago||||
What’s the joke?
DonHopkins 2 hours ago|||
It was tongue-in-cheek, but the cheek belonged to an underaged girl.
hyperman1 9 hours ago|||
Wow. That text is wild! Another excerpt:

  I've always thought that under-populated countries in Africa are vastly UNDER-polluted, their air quality is probably vastly inefficiently low compared to Los Angeles or Mexico City.
BurningFrog 3 hours ago|||
Being familiar with economist jargon, this looks like a joke.
MrDarcy 1 hour ago|||
The joke is that it looks like a joke but isn’t in the same way a sociopath will explain in detail exactly how they’re going to fuck you before they do knowing you won’t believe them because it’s all a joke in a joke that isn’t real.
cindyllm 44 minutes ago||
[dead]
Loughla 2 hours ago|||
So it's okay for people who have the power and connections to actually impact the world in the horrible ways they're "joking"about to make jokes about doing just that?

I don't think it is. What's the old saying? There's a grain of truth in every joke.

datatrashfire 4 hours ago||||
Would you accept 0 pollution if it meant you had no electricity, electronic devices, or access to transportation? All of those things create pollution.
ben_w 3 hours ago|||
That's the great thing about "invention", there are other ways to 0 pollution besides historic ones.

Worse than that, actually: to get to 0 pollution by only deleting things, you'd also need to remove one of the main sources of pollution in third world countries: cooking with fire.

Invention has already given us renewable electricity, and using that to cook is much better than inhaling wood smoke.

estimator7292 3 hours ago||||
Hey, you probably don't want to sympathize with a guy that everyone around you thinks is irredeemably evil.

And if you do still want to sympathize with such, maybe examine that motivation for like three seconds.

Dracophoenix 3 hours ago|||
"Bad" people can still have good ideas or well-thought arguments. It happens often enough to have become became a clichéd meme.

https://clickhole.com/heartbreaking-the-worst-person-you-kno...

JuniperMesos 2 hours ago|||
> Hey, you probably don't want to sympathize with a guy that everyone around you thinks is irredeemably evil.

> And if you do still want to sympathize with such, maybe examine that motivation for like three seconds.

This sounds like a theat - "hate the person we all hate too, or maybe you yourself are a threat to the group's values, and since we can't actually get to the guy we hate, we'll punish you in his stead for being a sympathizer"

defrost 3 hours ago|||
A good many people I know and have known for 60+ years would, do, and yearn for civilisation as you know it to back the f off and get its foot from their neck.

Yes, they are fully awar of what that means and they have lived without electricity, devices, and transport.

Embrace of bleeding edge tech isn't universal, hell even the embrace of the past 100 years of tech isn't for every human.

recursive 8 hours ago|||
The /s was supposed to be implied.
rhcom2 8 hours ago|||
And Jonathan Swift was actually advocating eating children.
jonny_eh 5 hours ago|||
Jonathan Swift was a writer and known satirist with publicly known views that were opposite to the absurdist views expressed in his famous satire.
palmotea 7 hours ago|||
> And Jonathan Swift was actually advocating eating children.

If you're going to engage in satire, its best the satire be obvious.

I believe there are capitalist economist types who believe what Summers wrote unironically.

rhcom2 5 hours ago|||
Also known as: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law
mwcremer 4 hours ago|||
Sorry, did you mean "Summers unironically wrote" or "capitalist economist types unironically believe" ?
abigail95 4 hours ago|||
This is dumber than "Helicopter Ben" Bernanke.
29athrowaway 2 hours ago|||
That memo redefines himself as toxic waste.
burkaman 8 hours ago|||
He also famously gave a speech declaring that one of the reasons women were underrepresented in science and engineering faculty positions was "issues of intrinsic aptitude". - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/science-jan-june05-summ...

It was 20 years ago but he has not changed his views, in one of his emails to Epstein (in 2017) he "observed that half the IQ in world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51 percent of population..."

tptacek 5 hours ago|||
Most notable about that is the implied confession that he was lying in his original formulation, which was that there was more variability in male intelligence than female intelligence (higher highs, lower lows). In fact, his private undisclosed belief was simply that women were inferior.
ben_w 3 hours ago||
I remember hearing about the variance thing ages ago. Back when I was young enough and naïve enough to trust statements said in official voices without critically assessing them.

With the caveat that IQ tests scores are now provably something one can learn to be good at (because LLMs do much better on public tests than private ones), was the claim about variably actually justified at the time, or was it nonsense even back then?

tptacek 3 hours ago||
I'm not touching the variability thing with a 10 foot pole except to say that the further out on each extreme of the IQ "scale" you go the less reliable the scores are. The whole idea of using IQ as a ranking of ability rather than a diagnostic tools is bogus. I do think it's clear now though that Summers was simply being a misogynist (you lose the presumption of good faith when you disclose that you'd been lying all along.)
ben_w 3 hours ago||
Oh indeed, on all counts. I'd just like to know if it was purely his own BS, or the reproducibility crisis.

(I don't know why I'd like to know, thinking about it at a meta level…)

watwut 7 hours ago|||
I remember brouhaha a whole bunch of pundits and thinkers defending him against evil feminists. On the grounds of intelectual curiosity and rational thinking.

Hey, turns out the dude trades "how to flirt with women in workplace whem they do presentation" advice with literal child abuse sex ring leader.

Surely he could not possibly be sexist, nah.

shkkmo 8 hours ago||
To me that memo is pretty clearly a sacarstic version of reductio ad absurdum.
koolba 13 hours ago||
In related news, Harvard is also launching its own investigation into its former president Summers: https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2025/11/19/harvard-opens-...
bn-l 7 minutes ago||
I find it hard to believe that they’re only finding out now.
benzible 1 hour ago|||
The one-time head of the most elite academic institution as well as the US Treasury is an insecure 12 year old boy at heart. Summers clearly saw Epstein as aspirational for his "success" with "women". But this isn't really new information about him. In 2005 at NBER he went in front of top women scientists and basically said the lack of women at the top of science was mostly about their lack of innate aptitude, not discrimination [1] (he gave multiple alternate "theories" but it was clear which one he actually believed). People immediately saw that for what it was: a powerful guy projecting his own hang-ups about women. That he's maintained his status over the last 20 years does not speak well of the US's most prestigious institutions.

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2005/2/18/full-transcript...

senderista 3 hours ago|||
OMG the correspondence described there is disgusting: Summers seeking advice from Epstein on how to turn a mentoring relationship into a romantic one.
pessimizer 8 hours ago||
[flagged]
ternaryoperator 3 hours ago|||
> It's also telling that the NYT is the only major outlet to consistently be reticent to state unequivocally that Epstein killed himself. Always said "found to have committed suicide."

Nonsense. "...Mr. Epstein, who died by suicide... [0] "...disgraced financier who died by suicide...[1] etc.

[0] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/18/us/politics/trump-epstein... [1] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/12/us/politics/trump-epstein...

cosmicgadget 56 minutes ago||||
> Trump had to finally buck the conspiracy theories of his evil, ignorant MAGA followers and admit that there was absolutely nothing to see and nothing interesting about the Epstein case and it's actually silly that you would think there was.

Didn't Bondi say there was thousands of hours of video of sex abuse? Was that made up?

650REDHAIR 3 hours ago||||
Isn’t NYT complicit and sat on a lot of Epstein files before the 2016 election.
bilbo0s 1 hour ago||
Um..

Just throwing it out there, but forget Epstein, I'm sure most of us would not believe what NYT is sitting on in general. This is effectively a defacto global intelligence gathering service. I bet if we could read through a lot of that we'd all be gobsmacked and just stop believing in humanity altogether.

I understand most of what we haven't seen is uncorroborated, but it would still make for interesting reading if we didn't have to worry about falling down an elevator shaft onto some bullets.

hn_throwaway_99 2 hours ago||||
> Nice that MAGA demands accountability from Trump in a way Democrats don't from their leaders.

What planet do you live on?? I don't see any blowback against Trump himself from MAGA followers. It's always "he's getting bad advice", or they blame his sycophants like Bondi. If MAGA demanded accountability from Trump they seemed to be totally fine when he was caught boasting on tape of committing sexual assault.

ipaddr 1 hour ago|||
MAGA will follow Trump off a bridge. The America First collective pushed for this and many of them have given up on Trump.
trts 2 hours ago|||
not sure where you are looking but Rasmussen polls have been showing Trump hemorrhaging support since June among his base. if you visit X this is where many of them converse, and they are quite openly unhappy with the admin lately
irjustin 1 hour ago||
I believe it has nothing to do with sexual offense and that the higher prices of goods is really affecting people.

So he's still immune the anything that's horrendous.

trts 1 hour ago||
guess you can believe what you want but data shows the Epstein topic has been damaging his base support
lo_zamoyski 3 hours ago|||
> Nice that MAGA demands accountability from Trump in a way Democrats don't from their leaders.

This doesn't accord with experience. MAGA is notorious for rationalizing anything Trump says or does.

The uniparty is a rotten, spiraling race to the bottom.

yahoozoo 3 hours ago|||
Usually true, but the MAGA base was truly pushing this.
DonHopkins 2 hours ago||
Only because Trump told them to push it first. His problem is that he changed his mind.
mrcsharp 2 hours ago|||
Then you're in a bubble.
bilbo0s 1 hour ago||
Not to put too fine a point on it, but you both are in a bubble.

They're just different bubbles.

Liberals and conservatives have methodically and deliberately avoided holding their leaders accountable for decades. The only people who can't see that, are, frankly, liberals and conservatives.

What we have now is an opportunity to sweep everyone from Trump on down out of office. Anyone who would work for Trump or Clinton should have their judgement questioned at a minimum. And they should pray we don't look any further into what they've been getting up to.

This is a golden opportunity to scrub the walls clean and put in new people en masse. But I'm not naive. I know the corruption of the incumbent power brokers and parties will undoubtedly win the day. You can bet your bottom dollar that conservatives and liberals are cooperating and they've got the courts, Homeland security, CIA, everything.. out cleaning up for them. I just wish they'd get what's coming to them for once.

rustystump 44 minutes ago||
Thank you!

Cannot count the number of times people forget how powerful algorithmic bubble making is. It isnt a “you are in a bubble so ur dumb” it is more of, “all of our information is algorithmically fed to us be aware!”

To add to this, I have a friend who has two kids. One is lefty trans and the other is becoming a christian conservative. They are Indian zoomers. Two totally different algorithms at work. One got the Charlie and the other got Hassan. Really makes one wonder what is in your own information feed.

frankest 3 hours ago||
The big question here is are they involved with Epstein because they are in power, or did they get power because they had Epstein pull in favors for them. From the emails he seems like the big spider in a spider web. Both parties and so many people in power referred to him for critical problems, pulling strings in critical places (Bannon on behalf of Trump was getting his advice on how to discredit Kavanaugh opponents and Epstein obliged with medical information on one of the opponents to bring up at a hearing). Beyond Clinton, Obama’s attorney is mentioned a bunch as well. I’m sure the democrats had plenty of favors in too.

My conclusion from information so far - this is a small subset of the files, and yet this seems like in a country where power should be divided to be balanced, a congealed network has been selecting and pulling the elites they want to the podium. The curation mechanism (may not be the only curation mechanism) has been people who are easy to manipulate by the network - too deep into perversions to ever come out of prison if they ever lost power. Thus more power and money becomes the only survival mechanism.

If you want a real constitutional democracy in the US, can you EVER have it if past presidents, or the networks underneath them, or party leaders who have no term limits, have control over who gets nominated to that power next? It’s not two parties. It’s one party that seems to be playing a show for the masses while taking Yin and Yang turns at the helm.

alex1138 5 hours ago||
"Winklevoss twins are assholes [but I have nothing substantive to say against their claim of product theft]" - LS
booleanbetrayal 5 hours ago||
I have loathed Larry Summers since the repeal of Glass-Steagall. He has consistently treated the American public like he treats women in the Epstein emails. So glad he's finally getting his comeuppance.
game_the0ry 4 hours ago||
Not enough, if you ask me. He should be publicly shamed and humiliated. Truly one of the most evil maniacs of our time.
dylan604 4 hours ago|||
Is that not what is happening?
ceejayoz 3 hours ago||
I mean, he’s still teaching. For now.
wombatpm 1 hour ago|||
Just announced,He is not completing his class.
SequoiaHope 1 hour ago|||
Gotta be a matter of time unless the place he teaches truly has no principles.
seizethecheese 1 hour ago|||
He teaches at Harvard.
bilbo0s 56 minutes ago|||
No such place. Not in today's world.

If you give a school enough evidence. Like, say, this email. Your career there is done.

And that's any school.

infamouscow 1 hour ago|||
I would like to bring the term "lamposted" into popular discourse.

I can only pray it becomes mainstream (along with the act, obviously). That is literally the only way to remedy this. You can pass new laws, but that does nothing for the past. You can go bankrupt trying to bring civil cases and possibly get some monetary compensation, but at a certain point all this stops working and people go back to what always works to return order back to society.

You can disagree, just understand you're agreeing to being subjugated or being enslaved, short of a viable and actionable alternative to being lamposted.

josh_p 1 hour ago|||
I hardly think a millionaire stepping away from his job is “comeuppance”.

Don’t forget Epstein’s circle of rapists and rapist-enablers still had friendly communication with him long after he was convicted and known pedophile.

I have doubts about officials’ ability to get real justice. I’ll still me shouting for blood in the streets, though.

jordanb 4 hours ago||
He was working at the Center for American Progress to ensure if the Democrats got back in power they would be committed to not fixing anything, fulfilling any promises, or doing anything beyond Clinton/Obama/Biden managed decline.

Good riddance.

legitster 4 hours ago||
So far, what has been revealed in the documents is embarrassing, but not necessarily implicating: https://searchepsteinfiles.com/person/163

For the most part, the threads are a mix of:

- Really cringe dating advice

- Epstein connecting Summers with other important people

- Dishing on Trump and his inner circle

Given there were many more prominently featured people with more dirt in here, I wonder if Summers is worried there's a lot more that's about to be revealed.

hapless 4 hours ago||
really cringe dating advice about pursuing an affair with a student almost 40 years younger than he is

it's way beyond cringe

lupire 2 hours ago|||
27 years younger.

She is approximately 43 (college grad '04) and he is 70.

The text messages were 6 years ago.

legitster 4 hours ago|||
Has the name of the woman come out? She's not directly named in their communications.
IG_Semmelweiss 2 hours ago|||
her name was front page news in several US tabloids today
aerostable_slug 49 minutes ago||
And in the Harvard Crimson.
PaulDavisThe1st 4 hours ago|||
Yes, it has.
hintymad 4 hours ago|||
Epstein seemed to be a power broker and a political fixer. If so, naturally many high-profile people would have interacted with him and even have confided in him. It does not mean everyone associated with him knew or participated in his criminal activities, right?
noitpmeder 4 hours ago|||
Agreed, but continued communication after he was found guilty of sex crimes is definitely a bright red flag.
hapless 4 hours ago|||
hang loose, young lady, i have to ask this sex criminal how best to respond to your latest message
hintymad 3 hours ago|||
absolutely
legitster 4 hours ago||||
An example of one of the typical meetings Epstein was able to finagle with Summers:

> this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any.....also if you >think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit, clinton ,security council, holy shit im on for next 30 minutes

https://searchepsteinfiles.com/file/text/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028...

He also regularly provided research funding for universities.

hapless 4 hours ago||||
he didn't have any power or ability to fix anything that didn't involve trafficking young girls

he can "fix" you up with a teenager who will give you a private "massage"

legitster 4 hours ago|||
Not sure where you are getting this from. He regularly connected people with each other. The sex trafficking was just a small part of his nefarious power network
hintymad 3 hours ago||||
Not to defend Epstein, of course, but just to comment on the power brokering side. My understanding is that a power broker gets power by staying close to the power and by connecting people. I don't understand why powerful people need such broker, even though history shows other wise.
lupire 1 hour ago||
Same as any broker of stocks, houses, spouses, jobs, airline tickets.

The broker connects people, especially in the pre-Internet / young Internet days . The clients at ebsuy doing their main activity.

octoberfranklin 3 hours ago|||
he can "fix" you up with a teenager who will give you a private "massage"

... while being videotaped. Those recordings provide him an immense amount of power and ability.

worik 4 hours ago||||
> Epstein seemed to be a power broker and a political fixer. If so...

If so we are getting a window into a world we rarely see. For some of us this is confirming our priors, for others this will be profoundly shocking.

FridayoLeary 1 hour ago||
It's a pity he hung himself. Otherwise he might have been induced into giving over a lot of secrets about lots of rich and powerful people....
huflungdung 4 hours ago|||
[dead]
dylan604 3 hours ago||
> - Dishing on Trump and his inner circle

At this moment in time, this is the most serious crime to those in charge

add-sub-mul-div 8 hours ago||
Actual unedited title: "Larry Summers resigns from OpenAI board after release of emails with Epstein"
foobarian 8 hours ago||
Title as interpreted by me: "Larry Summers was on the OpenAI board this whole time"
pphysch 5 hours ago||
Echoes of Kissinger on Theranos' board (and many other examples, no doubt).
hermitcrab 4 hours ago|||
I still haven't got over war criminal Kissinger getting a Nobel Peace Prize.
ben_w 3 hours ago|||
Such a weird history, that one.

Two of the committee resigned in protest, Kissinger almost turned it down because it was also being awarded to Lê Đức Thọ, Lê Đức Thọ actually turned it down because the peace it was supposed to be about hadn't happened yet, Kissinger accepted in absentia as he did not want to be targeted by anti-war protestors when getting the peace prize, then he later tried to return it only for the committee to say no.

FridayoLeary 1 hour ago||||
They gave Arafat the prize as well. Basically for promising to stop murdering jews. A promise he reneged upon almost immediately to be clear. But of course the bar had already been set impossibly low by awarding the prize in chemistry to Fritz Haber, the guy who literally invented chemical warfare. At least to Kissingers credit he did try quite hard to make peace and sometimes succeeded.

Then they give the prize to guys who don't deserve it like Obama and overlook Trump, who even his biggest haters cannot claim hasn't done a lot of war ending over 2 terms.

lupire 1 hour ago|||
The Peace Prize is weird one. It is a political tool to pressure people toward peace. That's why Obama got one strictly for not being George W Bush.

It's one of the few Trump grievant that is legitimate.

wantlotsofcurry 5 hours ago|||
I had to look this up. That is absolutely insane…
chihuahua 2 hours ago|||
John Carreyrou's book "Bad blood" is extremely good. Full of suspense, amazing revelations. I highly recommend it. It explores a lot of Elizabeth Holmes' and Sunny Balwani's insanity.
dylan604 3 hours ago|||
If you don't have time for the book, there's a decent documentary available
rchaud 8 hours ago|||
It might have gotten flagged as political content if the full title was used.
pton_xd 8 hours ago||
Reid Hoffman already resigned so I guess, kudos to him for getting ahead of the curve!
dylan604 3 hours ago||
Next up will be selling of shares to finance defense teams
alex1138 5 hours ago|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVG5V7FzB_Q
More comments...