Top
Best
New

Posted by JumpCrisscross 3 hours ago

Greeting Vocalizations in Domestic Cats Are More Frequent with Male Caregivers(onlinelibrary.wiley.com)
48 points | 34 comments
observationist 1 hour ago|
I can't wait for all the research papers from the "They Can Talk" talking buttons studies. Absolutely fascinating stuff coming out - pets apparently learn to understand not only simple words, but complex constructions and grammar, when sufficiently modeled by their people. They even chain together words in meaningful ways to augment their vocabulary and communicate complex ideas.

Simple vocalizations are cool, but that's pretty limited communication, and if they're capable of so much more, it's pretty likely that they're using individual meows in much the same way a human would under the same constraints. Imagine only being able to say "HEY!" and having to use context and body language in every situation.

TheyCanTalk have got n>10k animals so far, mostly cats and dogs, with a handful of pigs, rabbits, goats, and others. I've seen a few horses, cows, and others on social media, too, and they've got a lot more customers than study participants.

tkfoss 1 hour ago||
I haven't seen a single convincing example yet, do you mind sharing some?
nullstyle 44 minutes ago||
I’ve seen some BilliSpeaks videos that absolutely convince me cats have more language capabilities than previously thought.

When you say “convincing” what are you looking for? Do you think these youtubers are just using editing tricks and traps to convince a gullible internet? Genuinely curious.

canjobear 14 minutes ago|||
Do you have examples for complex grammar?
NetMageSCW 33 minutes ago|||
I am Groot.
OneDeuxTriSeiGo 1 hour ago||
Yeah it varies from individual to individual but the running theory I've seen is that cats can understand and interact with language at the level of a 3-4yo.
phainopepla2 1 hour ago|||
This is an absolutely wild theory. 3-4 year-olds can speak in full sentences, and understand quite complicated language
magixx 59 minutes ago||||
I would love to believe this but given my experience with my cat even single words are tough for them. For example my cat knows how to fetch her favorite toy but doesn't respond to the word "fetch" at all even with positive reinforcement (treats). The word "fetch" just doesn't mean anything for her even though I've paired it with the action of her fetch many times we play.
stavros 11 minutes ago|||
I don't know about cats (I haven't tried training) but my dog definitely knew a few nouns and verbs. She understood "food", "water", "walk", "bone", "ball", "bear" (her toys), and could distinguish between "point", "fetch", and "drop". With "fetch ball" she would go get the ball, whereas with "point food" she would point (paw) at the food, and with arbitrary combinations of these verbs and nouns.

It's astonishing, I didn't think they could do that, but apparently they can.

05 5 minutes ago||||
Treats are good and all but you will probably get better results with clicker training and splitting the job into simple parts. Fetch is pretty complicated and even dogs often have issues with it - our dog did just fine on the 'chase the toy' part - mostly due to strong prey drive - but then just ran away with it :). Took months to get it working.. Also cats usually lose interest quickly, so short sessions repeated more often will give better results.
toast0 52 minutes ago||||
The thing with cats is they can do a lot of things, but that doesn't mean they will.

My cats will regularly come when called, if they feel like it.

But... what's she going to do if you say fetch? If she wants to fetch, she'll bring you the toy and if she doesn't want to fetch, you telling her that you would like to isn't going to change her mind.

rendall 13 minutes ago||
After many years of living with cats, I have come to believe a cat actively refuses a command or request in a way that looks to humans like the cat does not hear or understand the request.
jasonjmcghee 51 minutes ago||||
Anecdotally, the pitch/tone/voice you say something seems to matter more than the words themselves, to cats.
bckr 53 minutes ago|||
I’m afraid you’re conflating understanding with obedience.
nkrisc 56 minutes ago|||
Having a 3-year old and two cats (and many more previously in my life), that sounds absurd.

I can give my 3-year old (38 months) multi-part instructions and he can even ask clarifying questions back when my instructions are ambiguous or he doesn’t understand them. He’s also being to ask insightful questions as he observes the world around him.

To suggest cats are capable of anything remotely close to that (with humans) requires extraordinary evidence.

lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 15 minutes ago|||
> he can even ask clarifying questions back when my instructions are ambiguous or he doesn’t understand them

This is kinda moot in this discussion given cats have neither the facial structure nor lung capacity for this. Others are essentially saying that a cat would (have the mental capacity to) do these things if they were not so physically constrained.

bombcar 39 minutes ago|||
My two year old can completely understand a sentence and then say, “No!” or ignore me.

I’ve had cats that could do the same.

SecondHandTofu 1 hour ago||
22 behavioral measures looking for one that is <0.05?

Unless they pre-registered that prediction, isn't this just the Texas Sharpshooter fallacy?

canjobear 13 minutes ago||
They did a Bonferroni correction to the p values, which is supposed to compensate for this kind of thing.
byronic 27 minutes ago|||
we asked seventy-four cats and you won't BELIEVE number eight
psunavy03 1 hour ago|||
p-hacking is a thing . . .
EnPissant 50 minutes ago||
Yep! It's green jelly beans cause acne almost exactly.
ddoolin 2 hours ago||
Anecdotally, my cats meow at me a lot. But they're my cats (others live in the house and help care for them). I also meow back more than anyone else. In fact, I might be the only one to do so. :)
abetusk 2 hours ago||
N=31

> We acknowledge that our sample size limits the generalizability of our findings on cat greeting behaviors.

psunavy03 1 hour ago|
That smacking sound you heard was stats professors facepalming across the world.
jacquesm 11 minutes ago||
What the cats really are saying is 'unshaved human alert, unshaved human alert'.
leoc 2 hours ago||
Already, a solid 2026 Ig Nobel contender.
gradus_ad 1 hour ago||
Or maybe they're more excited to see the male caregivers? Or maybe the male caregivers are louder themselves so they copy them? Or maybe...
ASalazarMX 55 minutes ago||
Maybe

"Greeting Vocalizations in [These 31] Domestic Cats Are More Frequent with Male Caregivers"

blindriver 16 minutes ago||
"n = 31" tells you how valuable this research paper is.
lawlessone 3 hours ago|
>it is therefore possible that male caregivers require more explicit vocalizations to notice and respond to the needs of their cats, which in turn reinforces cats' tendency to use more directed and frequent vocal behavior to attract their attention.

This is very funny. Ig Noble prize stuff. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ig_Nobel_Prize

x3n0ph3n3 2 hours ago||
Does the study mention anything about how much male caregivers meow back?
lawlessone 2 hours ago||
It says females are more verbally interactive, possibly for cultural reasons , study was done in Turkey.

Anecdotally i can see that being similar in europe though

markhahn 39 minutes ago||
cats being cats, perhaps a little verbal reticence is what it takes to inspire them ;)