Posted by zoidb 7 days ago
Perhaps it would be even nicer if the "advent" theme was more prominently present, e.g. using the Bible as the target data file to be used.
Here's three examples tasks from me:
(1) Write an sh script (using only POSIX standard commands) to create a Keywords in Context (KWIC) concordance of the new testament.
(2) Write a bash script that uses grep with regular expressions to extracts all literal quotes of what Jesus said in the New Testament. [Incidentally, doing this task manually marked the beginnings of philology and later automating it marked the beginning of what was later called literary and linguistic computing, corpus linguistics, computational linguistics, and digital humanities.]
(3) How many times is Jesus mentioned by each of the four accounts of his life (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John)?
(You may begin by extracting the New Testament from the end of the Bible with a grep command.)
Specifically, while it is true that certain kinds of words can become decoupled from their original meanings (which is generally normal), in this case, the usage is not so decoupled, especially given that this usage occurs during the religious season of Advent and with the intentional allusion to the religious season of Advent. (Otherwise, what is "Advent of X" without its religious origin and which takes place at the exact same time during the year?)
You can make a much stronger argument that the non-religious usage is a kind of cultural appropriation. That would make your concern entirely backwards. Your wish is to keep it "neutral" to please those who don't practice Advent, as you show a simultaneous lack of concern for the tradition it appropriates from. This involves a tacit claim of possessing the authority to do so as well, but if anything, given the source, if anything, the authority belongs not to the appropriators, but to the Church.
One wonders how a "Ramadan of Code" or "Teshuvah of Shell" would be received.
"Neutrality" is, of course, a bunk concept, and the idea that we ought to be guided by what is "nice" rather than what is "good" is a grave misunderstanding of how decisions ought to be made.
By all means, you should do what you think is "good". That's what I strive to do. My comment about "nice" was literally quoting you, so in trying to take me to task for that, as with your broader point, you've missed the mark. I don't think your hypocrisy is intentional, but I do feel good about pointing it out.
Have a nice day and holiday season! :)
only content no filenames. Need to see the output if it's wrong to baseline what's being asked.
Like, do a complex background worker for a web server that listens to a socket, does complicated stuff, exports functions (if in Bash), etc.
You don't have to use it afterwards. The value is in the journey. It's fun :)
My answer: `ls -a`
"lines that contain 'laugh'". lines of what? Doesn't tell you without looking at the answer.
genius.
I found a-Shell's documentation[1] quite interesting, it describes their use of web assembly and offers some practical tips for compiling stuff so it can work in a sandboxed environment.
[1]: https://bianshen00009.gitbook.io/a-guide-to-a-shell/lets-do-...