See also: The Ultimate Oldschool PC Font Pack from VileR at <https://int10h.org/oldschool-pc-fonts/fontlist/>.
I came across this website when I was looking for IBM PC OEM fonts for a little HTML + Canvas-based invaders-like game I was developing a few years ago. It is impressive how much effort VileR has poured into recovering each OEM font and their countless variants, from a wide range of ROMs. The site not only archives them all with incredible attention to detail, but also offers live previews, aspect ratio correction and other thoughtful features that make exploring it a joy. I've spent numerous hours there comparing different OEM fonts and hunting down the best ones to use in my own work!
It took several seconds to load for me, so here's the first paragraph. It's a good first paragraph, though!
Also:
I won't have to wait seconds (!!!) to read it
I come to the comments to find out what these "clickbait title" articles (meaningless words with no context) really are before clicking.
Secondly, the site appears to be "hug of death"'d at the moment. I presume it was still accessible but struggling when OP posted.
Out of curiosity I checked with lsof, apparently other fonts are used as fallback:
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/droid/DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf
/usr/local/share/fonts/MS/segmdl2.ttf
/usr/local/share/fonts/MS/seguisym.ttf
/usr/local/share/fonts/nerd/Iosevka/IosevkaNerdFont-Regular.ttf
/usr/local/share/fonts/nerd/JetBrainsMono/JetBrainsMonoNerdFontMono-Regular.ttf
At least the result is perfect!
So is Webdings: https://www.dafontfree.io/webdings-font/
Webdings even got integrated into Unicode 7.0, so all the Noto fonts support it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webdings
And recode(1) has full support for ISO-8859-*. As does iconv and the Python3 encodings.codecs module. I'm pretty sure browsers can render pages in them, too. Firefox keeps rendering UTF-8 pages as if they were ISO-8859-1 encoded when I screw up at setting the charset parameter on their content-type.
That's the point. Think again.
With Nerdfonts, these will be obsolete in further Unicode releases.
GNU Unifont and the unicode table might be backported to the Amiga. With NerdFonts, you need to do twice the jobs.
I'm envious of the level of nerdiness and genius at display, and hope some of it rubbed off on me by watching that demo.
I'll definitely give this a try in my Linux TTY. Thanks for sharing!
Do you have a link to the MUD you're working on?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixel
we are full circle, 40 year later.
Today, when we're sending it to terminal emulators running on teraflops supercomputers over gigabit-per-second links, it's only a waste of CPU and software complexity instead of user time and precious bandwidth. But it's still a waste.
Why couldn't we have FTP and Gopher support in web browsers instead?
Then why do I have it now? Time travel?
I mean not really, they are ancient and horribly insecure protocols without enough users to justify improving them.
Also, you may not have noticed this, but you're commenting on a thread that's largely about PETSCII and Videotex.
Fortunately, AFAIK, there isn't any significant body of existing Sixel art we need to preserve access to.
The browser support would have need continous security fixes and rewrites unfortunately, the protocol specs and the code was written in the day and age of a much less adversarial internet. It's much safer to handle those sort of protocols with a HTTPS proxy on the front these days. There's dedicated gopher and ftp clients still out there, IMHO browsers are too big and bloated as they are they need more stuff taken out of them, not more added without taking anything away, particularly stuff thats old and insecure and not used much anymore.
And yes, I'm also here for the retro factor :-) my pet project is Z80/6502 emulation in UnrealEngine with VT100 and VGA support and running BBS's in space. So I'm all over stuff about old ANSI, PETSCII and anything even tangentially 8x8 character set related:
The entire original point of the WWW project was, approximately, providing a better user interface for accessing files on FTP servers. So to me it seems perverse that the current stewards of the Web have broken that.
Each UTF8 character (1 to 3 bytes) corresponds to 1 byte of input data. The average increase in data size is about 70%, but you gain binary independence in any medium that understands utf8 (email, the terminal, unit tests, etc.)
Nice work! But if you want something like this in production, base64 only increases the size by 33%.
