Top
Best
New

Posted by Krontab 12/15/2025

Samsung may end SATA SSD production soon(www.techradar.com)
109 points | 114 commentspage 2
esjeon 12/15/2025|
It’s a shame. I’m really enjoying their SATA 8TB QLC SSDs in RAID0 for mostly read-only data. It seems like I cannot scale my system vertically in the same manner. :/
gsibble 12/15/2025||
Probably no longer profitable and they can change that production capacity to something that is.

I haven't even seen a SATA SSD in 5+ years. Don't know anyone that uses them.

pjdesno 12/15/2025||
The storage markets I can think of, off the top of my head: 1. individual computers 2. hobbyist NAS, which may cross over at the high end into the pro audio/video market 3. cloud 4. enterprise

#1 is all NVMe. It's dominated by laptops, and desktops (which are still 30% or so of shipments) are probably at the high end of the performance range.

#2 isn't a big market, and takes what they can get. Like #3, most of them can just plug in SAS drives instead of SATA.

#3 - there's an enterprise market for capacity drives with a lower per-device cost overhead than NVMe - it's surprisingly expensive to build a box that will hold dozens of NVMe drives - but SAS is twice as fast as SATA, and you can re-use the adapters and mechanicals that you're already using for SATA. (pretty much every non-motherboard SATA adapter is SAS/SATA already, and has been that way for a decade)

#4 - cloud uses capacity HDDs and both performance and capacity NVMe. They probably buy >50% of the HDD capacity sold today; I'm not sure what share of the SSD market they buy. The vendors produce whatever the big cloud providers want; I assume this announcement means SATA SSDs aren't on their list.

I would guess that SATA will stay on the market for a long time in two forms: - crap SSDs, for the die-hards on HN and other places :-) - HDDs, because they don't need the higher SAS transfer rate for the foreseeable future, and for the drive vendor it's probably just a different firmware load on the same silicon.

pdimitar 12/16/2025|
I agree hobbyist NAS is niche but it's very useful: less noise, less electricity bills, and not that much less space i.e. if you can find 3x Samsung 870 QVO drives at 8TB, you can have a super solid 16TB NAS with redundancy (or 24TB without). Not to mention compact; you can have an ITX-sized PC do quite a lot of work.
zb3 12/15/2025||
Fsck this cartel.. I hope China will fill these gaps and help restore normal prices.
vachina 12/15/2025||
China has also wisened up and is limiting supplies also. Their B2C marketplace is seeing less and less >1TB SSDs and even those who sell I've seen prices x2 in the span of two months.
kasabali 12/16/2025||
They aren't limiting supplies, they can't scale up the production: https://www.reuters.com/commentary/breakingviews/chinas-chip...
Flavius 12/15/2025||
You will be down-voted to hell for this comment, but luckily their down-votes can't stop China. Tariffs can though...
Analemma_ 12/15/2025|||
He's being downvoted because it's a dumb, knee-jerk comment. This has nothing to do with RAM, the thing getting really expensive at the moment, and Samsung isn't even stopping SSD production (which would be worth getting really mad about). It's about stopping production for a specific interface which has long since been saturated by even the cheapest, crummiest SSDs.

SATA SSDs don't really have much of a reason to exist anymore (and to the extent they do, certainly not by Samsung, who specializes in the biggest, baddest, fastest drives you can buy and is probably happy to leave the low end of the market to others).

zb3 12/15/2025||
Funnily enough, I wasn't even downvoted yet :D

But you see, it's hard to post smarter comments when the title and the article don't help..

cheema33 12/15/2025|||
> down-votes can't stop China. Tariffs can though...

People like you and I pay tariffs. Not China. You realize that right? And how will that stop China? Tariffs mostly hurt American consumers and producers. Just ask farmers.

tracker1 12/15/2025||
First, cost != price. Pricing is in part based on competitive product availability. So if the cost of a product + tariff is greater than the cost of a competing product, there is pressure to reduce that cost. There's also pressure to produce elsewhere, such as domestically to avoid the tariff altogether.

This is a large part of why the tariffs have in fact not had the dramatic impact on all pricing that some have suggested would happen. It's been largely a negotiation tactic first, and second, many products have plenty of margin and competition to allow for pricing to remain relatively level even in the face of tariffs... so it absolutely can, in fact be a burden borne by Chinese manufacturers by lowering margins instead of US importers simply eating the cost of tariffs.

up2isomorphism 12/15/2025||
People are at same time complaining about data slow but they seem to happily paying AWS 10x for less iops and bandwidth.
fckgw 12/15/2025|
What does this have to do with consumer SATA SSDs?
8cvor6j844qw_d6 12/15/2025|
If Samsung (maybe) ends SSD production and Crucial existing the consumer business, what is the next best alternative for SSD products?

I thought Samsung was the de facto choice for high-quality SSD products.

iooi 12/15/2025||
SATA, not NVMe, they will still be making SSDs.
tracker1 12/16/2025||
there are more non-crucial suppliers of Micron based ram than Crucial... they can pick up the slack... Micron simply wanted to redirect resources to supporting larger contracts to other suppliers over direct consumer support. The market isn't shrinking as a result.

I would suspect the same with Samsung exiting SATA (not NVME) drives... their chips are likely to be used by other MFGs, but even then maybe not as SATA is much slower than what most solid state memory and controllers are capable of supporting. There's also a massive low-end market of competition for SATA SSDs and Samsung sales are likely not the best overall.