Top
Best
New

Posted by coloneltcb 6 days ago

GitHub postponing the announced billing change for self-hosted GitHub Actions(twitter.com)
https://resources.github.com/actions/2026-pricing-changes-fo...
157 points | 126 commentspage 3
N_Lens 6 days ago|
The outcry against this move was much larger than Microsoft anticipated. While there is some logic for charging for self-hosted, it just doesn't make sense for the consumers.
ChrisArchitect 6 days ago||
Related:

initial development and reactions:

Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46291156

donatj 6 days ago||
The utter rent-seeking audacity of charging by the minute for action runners you run on your own server...

Charge a flat fee per Action, sure. There is a tiny cost on GitHub's part associated with the API calls for starting and stopping, but if my build takes 8 hours on a self-hosted runner there is no more cost to GitHub than it taking 10 seconds.

That's the whole point of self-hosted runners.

Maybe there was more outrage elsewhere, but I was frankly confused at the seeming lack thereof here on Hacker News.

ClikeX 6 days ago||
Yeah, the per minute pricing is what really does it. It makes me think they've gone with the worst option first, so people will swallow the new adjusted workflow they'll come up with.
franktankbank 6 days ago||
I don't even understand how they could do it. You own the servers that are giving them responses to determine the start/end times, so fudge the numbers fuck them, maybe you could find bugs in their shitty code so they start crediting you.

I think they kinda fucked themselves 3 concrete ways (among the nerds which may not be a problem for them):

1) this whole thing

2) the infinite running jobs issues which called attention to how poorly managed the GHA system is

3) zig et al announcing their departure and all the positive conversation around that

brodo 6 days ago||
https://archive.ph/3nsGi
ryandvm 6 days ago||
Seems like a year with record downtime for them is not a great time to announce a price increase...
top_sigrid 6 days ago||
See also:

- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46304379

- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46305216

Daviey 6 days ago||
Oh good, I can postpone my migration for personal projects.
redrove 6 days ago|
Or, rather, you have more time to execute it. They _will_ rug pull again, this is Microsoft ffs.
duskdozer 6 days ago|||
It's the classic strategy of floating an extreme change, "listening to feedback", and then coming back later with the price they intended to charge all along.
KJBweb 6 days ago|||
That's the signal I'm getting here and they're not even being coy about it, they're just postponing some form of inevitable price increase.
egorfine 6 days ago||
Who could've thought, really
ath3nd 4 days ago|
[dead]
More comments...