Top
Best
New

Posted by azhenley 1 day ago

I canceled my book deal(austinhenley.com)
592 points | 332 commentspage 4
algoghostf 1 day ago|
I think self publishing and publishing via an editor serve 2 different purposes. In my case, I always self published. My objective was simply to get my writing out there and have it as a "business card" with all the freedom. Publishing with editors is a different can of worms : more constraints, more process.. and to me removes part of the pleasure and the "amateur" aspect of it and a LOT of freedom. But is surely more professional though.
w10-1 1 day ago||
Writing for publication is a ridiculous amount of work, smoothing and digesting to the point of pablum, because it's just hard to please everybody. Now that LLM's can tailor to chapter-level discussions, why write?

Still, that's what it takes to reach N > friends+students.

It's beyond ironic that AI empowerment is leading actual creators to stop creating. Books don't make sense any more, and your pet open source project will be delivered mainly via LLM's that conceal your authorship and voice and bastardize the code.

Ideas form through packaging insight for others. Where's the incentive otherwise?

carlosjobim 1 day ago|
When you have original information that hasn't been released anywhere else in the world, why would a book be a bad choice?
miyoji 1 day ago||
This is why most publishers won't even talk to you unless you have a finished manuscript already, but I appreciated this look into a different situation.

I hope you finish the book. I would buy it.

WoodenChair 1 day ago||
> This is why most publishers won't even talk to you unless you have a finished manuscript already

This is absolutely not true in the world of technical publishing. I mean books published with publishers like O'Reilly, Manning, No Starch, etc. Usually you come to them with just a proposal and a couple chapters or even just a proposal. Or their acquisition editors actually reach out to you. It's the exception (not quite rare, but definitely less than 20% of books) that comes to them with a finished manuscript. I did that with my last book. I've published 5 technical books across three different technical publishers, so I know a bit about this business...

I'm just replying to this comment to not discourage people who just have an idea and not a finished book yet but have the motivation to finish and want to get a deal.

squirrel 1 day ago||
This is not true for business books like mine. It's vital to write a proposal first in that world; publishers want to influence the content (as in the OP article).

I think the same is true for tech books but I don't know as I haven't written one.

A novel or other fiction is the opposite; there you do have to write the whole thing first.

zkmon 1 day ago||
This story is a prototype of thousands of other stories going on right now. Of course we can't blame the book businesses. They are in survival struggle. They have no clue what to do. Every business is barely holding onto whatever that might keep them in business. AI is bad, but it is the new mafia in the town. Just erase all your beliefs instincts and make friends with it.

Maybe write a book about "Classic projects using AI", whether it makes sense or not. And use AI to write that.

neilv 1 day ago||
> Cons of a publisher: [...] they actually do little to no marketing of your book.

Unless the publisher has already written off a book, don't they have incentive to market it?

There are some low-cost things you can do to market a book, and they reportedly make the difference between no sales, and some or many sales.

And a publisher can learn the currently effective marketing methods, and then apply that skill across books of many authors.

levocardia 1 day ago|
No, their incentive is to wait and see what books are taking off, then pile on the money when they know it's already a winner. Today, unproven authors are expected to do their own marketing.
neilv 1 day ago||
For the marketing that has significant costs (e.g., paying for ads, paying for show appearances, paying other influencers to plug, making quality videos for social media, travel for events).

But it costs almost nothing to do ARC readers for reviews and ratings, and it's free to time things for the Kindle store algorithm. You just have to know to do it, when.

And there's some other "free" marketing that publishers should have automated by now, because they can amortize that across many book releases.

skeeter2020 8 hours ago||
related to not using AI, the project list shared is actually right in the sweet-spot for current LLMs ability to generate decent code.
kmoser 1 day ago||
I'm surprised the contract didn't obligate you to return most or all of the advance after canceling.
onraglanroad 1 day ago||
The first half of the advance was to be paid after the first third was approved.

They never got to that point.

metaphor 1 day ago||
I don't think he ever got the first half of the advance...cherry-picking from the TFA:

> They offered a $5000 advance with the first half paid out when they approve of the first third of the book and the second half when they accept the final manuscript for publication.

> I continued to get further behind on delivering my revised draft of the first 1/3.

> Around this time, there was a possibility of me changing jobs. Oh, and my wedding was coming up. That was the final nail in the coffin.

> There were too many things going on and I didn't enjoy working on the book anymore, so what is the point? I made up my mind to ask to freeze the project.

> They agreed.

barishnamazov 1 day ago||
Thanks for sharing! I have been dreaming of writing (or better yet, finding!) a similar book for a couple years now. A hands-on guide that peels back the layers of abstraction to teach how things actually work under the hood by building them yourself. I hope one of us gets to it one day :-)
conartist6 1 day ago||
That sounds like 2025. Everything is "required" to be about AI. Gooodbyee you silly year!
reactordev 1 day ago|
Sounds like your publisher was trying to just take your work and sell it. Giving you the least amount you’ll agree to.

Self publishing is the way. The internet is your Barnes & Noble. Finish the book and publish it yourself. Sell it for $20. Market it. Have peace.

dpark 1 day ago|
> Sounds like your publisher was trying to just take your work and sell it. Giving you the least amount you’ll agree to.

That’s literally what a publisher does.

reactordev 1 day ago||
I work in games, I know how publishing works. My point was about the pay. For us, that equation is flipped.
More comments...