Top
Best
New

Posted by pmaze 1/10/2026

Show HN: I used Claude Code to discover connections between 100 books(trails.pieterma.es)
I think LLMs are overused to summarise and underused to help us read deeper.

I built a system for Claude Code to browse 100 non-fiction books and find interesting connections between them.

I started out with a pipeline in stages, chaining together LLM calls to build up a context of the library. I was mainly getting back the insight that I was baking into the prompts, and the results weren't particularly surprising.

On a whim, I gave CC access to my debug CLI tools and found that it wiped the floor with that approach. It gave actually interesting results and required very little orchestration in comparison.

One of my favourite trail of excerpts goes from Jobs’ reality distortion field to Theranos’ fake demos, to Thiel on startup cults, to Hoffer on mass movement charlatans (https://trails.pieterma.es/trail/useful-lies/). A fun tendency is that Claude kept getting distracted by topics of secrecy, conspiracy, and hidden systems - as if the task itself summoned a Foucault’s Pendulum mindset.

Details:

* The books are picked from HN’s favourites (which I collected before: https://hnbooks.pieterma.es/).

* Chunks are indexed by topic using Gemini Flash Lite. The whole library cost about £10.

* Topics are organised into a tree structure using recursive Leiden partitioning and LLM labels. This gives a high-level sense of the themes.

* There are several ways to browse. The most useful are embedding similarity, topic tree siblings, and topics cooccurring within a chunk window.

* Everything is stored in SQLite and manipulated using a set of CLI tools.

I wrote more about the process here: https://pieterma.es/syntopic-reading-claude/

I’m curious if this way of reading resonates for anyone else - LLM-mediated or not.

524 points | 146 commentspage 4
dexterlagan 1/11/2026|
I had the same idea. I think this is very useful. As it is it does look like a proof-of-concept, and that's OK. I'd develop this as a book recommendation site and simply link to the books on Amazon or your preferred book source. Collect cash on referrals. Good stuff!
JimmyJamesJames 1/10/2026||
Like this initial step and its findings.

#1: would a larger dataset increase the depth and breadth of insight ( go to #2) #2: with the initial top 100, are there key ‘super node’ books that stand out as ones to read due the breadth they offer. Would a larger dataset identify further ‘super node’ books.

amelius 1/10/2026||
Makes me wonder, how well could an LLM-based solution score on the Netflix prize?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netflix_Prize

(Are people still trying to improve upon the original winning solution?)

trinsic2 1/11/2026||
Wow! This is a great idea. Really well put together site on that topic. I'm big into intuition and the "Expert Intuition" collation points to an area of science I rarely look at. Thanks for your work on this.
sciences44 1/10/2026||
Love the originality here - makes you curious to explore more.

Solid technical execution too. Well done!

barrenko 1/11/2026||
On a long enough timeline, we will be using Claude Code for .. any.. type of work?
neodypsis 1/11/2026||
I looked at the trails (lists of passages) and wondered whether it would be cheaper to build these lists by clustering passage embeddings, rather than having an LLM construct them.
dev_l1x_be 1/11/2026||
Claude code is good for arranging random things into categories, with code, configuration and documentation files it is barely goes into random rabbit holes or hallucinates categories for me.
adsharma 1/11/2026||
This is GraphRAG using SQLite.

Wouldn't it be good if recursive Leiden and cypher was built into an embedded DB?

That's what I'm looking into with mcp-server-ladybug.

nurettin 1/11/2026|
I did something similar with occult books and famous programming resources.

Conclusion: you find wisdom in everything if you look for it.

gvedem 1/11/2026|
we discordians refer to this as the Law of Fives:

>The Law of Fives states simply that: ALL THINGS HAPPEN IN FIVES, OR ARE DIVISIBLE BY OR ARE MULTIPLES OF FIVE, OR ARE SOMEHOW DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY APPROPRIATE TO 5.

>The Law of Fives is never wrong.

>In the Erisian Archives is an old memo from Omar to Mal-2: "I find the Law of Fives to be more and more manifest the harder I look."

nurettin 1/11/2026||
yes exactly. Replace five with shit and it still holds.
More comments...