Top
Best
New

Posted by dreadsword 1/15/2026

The URL shortener that makes your links look as suspicious as possible(creepylink.com)
739 points | 139 comments
postalcoder 1/15/2026|
There may actually be some utility here. LLM agents refuse to traverse the links. Tested with gemini-3-pro, gpt-5.2, and opus 4.5.

edit: gpt-oss 20B & 120B both eagerly visit it.

devsda 1/15/2026||
I wish this came a day earlier.

There is a current "show your personal site" post on top of HN [1] with 1500+ comments. I wonder how many of those sites are or will be hammered by AI bots in the next few days to steal/scrape content.

If this can be used as a temporary guard against AI bots, that would have been a good opportunity to test it out.

1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46618714

aflukasz 1/15/2026|||
AI bots (or clients claiming to be one) appear quite fast on new sites, at least that's what I saw recently in few places. They probably monitor Certificate Transparency logs - you won't hide by avoiding linking. Unless you are ok with staying in the shadow of naked http.
xlii 1/15/2026||||
I posted my site on the thread.

My site is hosted on Cloudflare and I trust its protection way more than flavor of the month method. This probably won't be patched anytime soon but I'd rather have some people click my link and not just avoid it along with AI because it looks fishy :)

treebeard901 1/15/2026|||
I've been considering how feasible it would be to build a modern form of the denial of service low orbit ion cannon by having various LLMs hammer sites until they break. I'm sure anything important already has Cloudflare style DDOS mitigation so maybe it's not as effective. Still, I think it's only a matter of time before someone figures it out.

There have been several amplification attacks using various protocols for DDOS too...

devsda 1/15/2026|||
Yeah I meant using it as an experiment to test with two different links(or domains) and not as a solution to evade bot traffic.

Still, I think it would be interesting to know if anybody noticed a visible spike in bot traffic(especially AI) after sharing their site info in that thread.

testfrequency 1/15/2026||||
Glad I’m not the only one who felt icky seeing that post.

I agree my tinfoil hat signal told me this was the perfect way to ask people for bespoke, hand crafted content - which of course AI will love to slurp up to keep feeding the bear.

kzalesak 1/15/2026||||
I think that something specifically intended for this, like Anubis, is a much better option.
subscribed 1/15/2026||
Anubis flatly refuses me access to several websites when I'm accessing them with a normal Chromium with enabled JS and whatnot, from a mainstream, typical OS, just with aggressive anti-tracking settings.

Not sure if that's the intended use case. At least Cloudflare politely masks for CAPTCHA.

john01dav 1/15/2026|||
I thought that Anubis solely is proof of work, so I'm very curious as to what's going on here.
fc417fc802 1/15/2026|||
What do you mean "refuses"? The worst it should do is serve up a high difficulty proof of work. Unless it gained new capabilities recently?

Are you sure the block isn't due to the authors of those websites using some other tool in addition?

jnrk 1/15/2026||||
Of course, the downside is that people might not even see your site at all because they’re afraid to click on that suspicious link.
postalcoder 1/15/2026||
Site should add a reverse lookup. Provide the poison and antidote.
gala8y 1/15/2026||
Bitly does that, just add '+' to Bitly URL (probably other shorteners, too).
briandear 1/15/2026|||
How is AI viewing content any different from Google? I don’t even use Google anymore because it’s so filled with SEO trash as to be useless for many things.
Zambyte 1/15/2026||
Try hosting a cgit server on a 1u server in your bedroom and you'll see why.
PUSH_AX 1/15/2026|||
LLM led scraping might not as it requires an LLM to make a choice to kick it off, but crawling for the purpose of training data is unlikely to be affected.
Barathkanna 1/15/2026||
Sounds like a useful signal for people building custom agents or models. Being able to control whether automated systems follow a link via metadata is an interesting lever, especially given how inconsistent current model heuristics are.
tcgv 1/15/2026||
Hole in one!

I shortened a link and when trying to access it in Chrome I get a red screen with this message:

  Dangerous site
  Attackers on the site you tried visiting might trick you into installing software or revealing things like your passwords, phone, or credit card numbers. Chrome strongly recommends going back to safety.
gnabgib 1/15/2026||
Related: A URL shortener not shortening the URL but makes it look very dodgy (434 points, 2023, 100 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34609461
vedmakk 1/15/2026||
That's less a URL shortener and more a URL dodgifier.
tylervigen 1/15/2026||
To be fair, the one in the OP also did not shorten any of the links I gave it.
Bengalilol 1/15/2026||
The key point here is "not shortening"
arjvik 1/15/2026||
My favorite link of all time:

https://jpmorgan.c1ic.link/logger_zcGFC2_bank_xss.docm

Definitely not meta

deltarholamda 1/15/2026||
I got one where the called script ended in ".pl" and I had a flashback to the 90s. My trousers grew into JNCOs, Limp Bizkit started playing out of nowhere and I got a massive urge to tell Slashdot that Alan Thicke had died.
cuechan 1/15/2026|||
With Firefox on Android it simply says

Deceptive site issue

This web page at [...] has been reported as a deceptive site and has been blocked based on your security preferences.

What's going on? I can't find any setting to disable this.

Yeri 1/15/2026||
NextDNS is blocking it too (https://google.c1ic.link/lottery_qrdLCz_account_verification). The reason is that Google Safe Browsing considers that site as unsafe.
fc417fc802 1/15/2026||
TBF it ought to trigger even the simplest heuristics so it wouldn't surprise me if it was automatically categorized that way.
fuddle 1/15/2026||
Imagine using this as your personal website lol
morshu9001 1/15/2026||
email too
latexr 1/15/2026||
I think it’s perfectly reasonable to make something useless for fun, it’s an interesting idea.

But what I’d like to understand is why there are so many of the same thing. I know I’ve seen this exact idea multiple times on HN. It’s funny the first time, but once it’s done once and the novelty is gone (which is almost immediately), what’s the point of another and another and another?

amne 1/15/2026||
I think it's just someone learning something new most of the time.

I have home made url shorteners in go, rust, java, python, php, elixir, typescript, etc. why? because I'm trying the language and this kind of project touches on many things: web, databases, custom logic, how and what design patterns can I apply using as much of the language as I can to build the thing.

latexr 1/15/2026||
Right. But the question is why redo the exact same joke? Why not come up with another twist (like the URL lengthener) or do no twist but be useful?

I’m not criticising the author or anyone who came before. I’m trying to understand the impetus between redoing a joke that isn’t yours. You don’t learn anything new by redoing the exact same gag that you wouldn’t learn by being even slightly original or making the project truly useful.

Ideas are a dime a dozen. You could make e.g. a Fonzie URL shortener (different lengths of “ayyyyy”), or an interstellar one (each is the name of a space object), or a binary one (all ones and zeroes)… Each of those would take about the same effort and teach you the same, but they’re also different enough they would make some people remember them, maybe even look at the author and their other projects, instead of just “oh, another one of these, close”.

postalcoder 1/15/2026||
A joke isn’t the best example because there are jokes that never changes but the delivery is a sign of mastery. The Aristocrats is like Bach’s cello suite for comedians.
latexr 1/15/2026||
The Aristocrats is a special case where the setup is the joke instead of the punchline. The point is the inventiveness of the journey. If it was told with the same setup every time, it wouldn’t be funny.
victords 1/15/2026|||
A fun project doesn't need to be original, IMO.

URL Shortener is still one of the most popular System Design questions, building this project is a great way to have some experience / understanding of it, for example.

latexr 1/15/2026||
> A fun project doesn't need to be original, IMO.

I agree. But a URL shortener with a twist isn’t just fun, it’s funny. The joke—as opposed to the usefulness—is what’s interesting about it. But when the same joke is overdone, it’s no longer funny.

> building this project is a great way to have some experience / understanding of it

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46632329

meken 1/15/2026||
I’ve been browsing this site for a decade plus and this idea was new to me. Maybe the author is in the same boat.

Edit: I see referencnes to shadyurl in the comments and I have heard of that, but probably wouldn’t have thought of it.

latexr 1/15/2026||
Fair. I’d think they would look for prior work beforehand, but that’s perfectly valid.

https://xkcd.com/1053/

Again, this was not a criticism, but a genuine question.

autoexec 1/15/2026||
Every URL shortener is suspicious.

While this seems like it would make it harder for them I wouldn't be surprised if scammers eventually try to abuse this service too and I have no doubt that people would happily click these if they found in them in a phishing email, that said I give the folks behind this a lot of credit for having a way to contact them and report links if that happens.

qnleigh 1/15/2026||
What's up with the creepy ads on this website? It seems like they are actually sketchy ads and not just fake ads for comedic effect. One shows some scammy nonsense about your device being infected and the other links to a real VPN app.
wmeredith 1/15/2026||
This is probably the result of a context based ad network serving sketchy adds because of the suspicious url content.
HPsquared 1/15/2026||
That's just the ambient creepiness of the internet. It's a creepy place!
bityard 1/15/2026||
IIRC, shadyurl was the original version of this. Doesn't seem to be around anymore, though.
nomel 1/15/2026|
shadyurl a whole bunch of different incredibly shady domains that were used at random. it was beautiful.
codemogul 1/15/2026||
BRILLIANT! Even Chrome says nope/DANGEROUS to a creepified link to mail.google.com
zX41ZdbW 1/15/2026|
I would also like to have something like this, but for "vintage" links - something that looks like it was from the late 90s.

I use them in tests, just for fun: https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/blob/master/tests/q...

eythian 1/15/2026|
There was a "shadyurl". The site itself seems to be long gone, but this'll give you some context: https://www.mikelacher.com/work/shady-url/
More comments...