Top
Best
New

Posted by bookofjoe 8 hours ago

Microsoft gave FBI set of BitLocker encryption keys to unlock suspects' laptops(techcrunch.com)
578 points | 407 commentspage 4
gethly 6 hours ago|
it's like microsoft has nothing better to do other than keep digging the hole to burry windows as mainstay operating system deeper and deeper with every new day.
citizenpaul 3 hours ago||
Relevant XKCD

https://xkcd.com/538/

diego_moita 6 hours ago||
This isn't even about Microsoft or BitLocker. This is about the U.S.A.: anyone who thrusts the rule of law in the U.S. is a fool.

Yes, the American government retrieves these keys "legally". But so what? The American courts won't protect foreigners, even if they are heads of state or dictators. The American government routinely frees criminals (the ones that donate to Republicans) and persecutes lawful citizens (the ones that cause trouble to Republicans). The "rule of law" in the U.S. is a farce.

And this is not just about the U.S. Under the "five eyes" agreement, the governments of Canada, UK, Autralia and New Zealand could also grab your secrets.

Never trust the United States. We live in dangerous times. Ignore it at your own risk.

SilverElfin 7 hours ago||
This is disappointing but I wonder if this is quid pro quo. Microsoft and Nadella want to appear to be cooperating with the government, so they are given more government contracts and so they don’t get regulatory problems (like on antitrust or whatever).
kittikitti 6 hours ago||
[flagged]
tucnak 7 hours ago||
Water is wet. More news at 11
yndoendo 7 hours ago|
Water is not wet. Water makes non-hydrophobic materials wet.

This news piece from a non-tech organization will help educate non-tech people.

londons_explore 7 hours ago|
> The case involved several people suspected of fraud related to the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program

If it were preventing a mass murder I might feel differently...

But this is protecting the money supply (and indirectly the governments control).

Not a reason to violate privacy IMO, especially when at the time this was done these people were only suspected of fraud, not convicted.

Aurornis 7 hours ago||
> Not a reason to violate privacy IMO, especially when at the time this was done these people were only suspected of fraud, not convicted.

Well you can't really wait until the conviction to collect evidence in a criminal trial.

There are several stages that law enforcement must go through to get a warrant like this. The police didn't literally phone up Microsoft and ask for the keys to someone's laptop on a hunch. They had to have already confiscated the laptop, which means they had to have collected enough early evidence to prove suspicion and get a judge to sign off and so on.

SoftTalker 7 hours ago||
They had a warrant. That's enough. Nobody at Microsoft is going to be willing to go to jail for contempt to protect fraudsters grifting off of the public taxpayer. Would you?
beeflet 2 hours ago||
Yes. Businesses have a moral responsibility to honor their agreements with their stakeholders above the government.