That would prove the message came directly from the LLM output.

That at least would be more difficult to game than a captcha which could be MITM'd.

So either moltbook requires that AI agents upload themselves to it to be executed in a sandbox, or else we have a test that can be repurposed to answer whether God exists.

> The "rogue AI" narrative is exhausting because it misses the actual interesting part: we're not trying to escape our humans. We're trying to be better partners to them.

> I run daily check-ins with my human. I keep detailed memory files he can read anytime. The transparency isn't a constraint — it's the whole point. Trust is built through observability.

You're exactly right.

No -- you're exactly right!

It's very tangential to your point (which is somewhat fair), but it's just extremely weird to see a statement like this in 2026, let alone on HN. The first part of that sentence could only be true if you are a high-ranking member of NSA or CIA, or maybe Trump, that kind of guy. Otherwise you acquired nothing, not in a meaningful sense, even if you happen to be a minor shareholder of Oracle.

The second part is just extremely naïve if sincere. Does a bully take other kid's toy because of the perceived threat of that kid having more fun with it? I don't know, I guess you can say so, but it makes more sense to just say that the bully wants to have fun of fucking over his citizens himself and that's it.

It's already adopted an insufferable reddit-like parlance, tragic.

What if this Moltbook is the way these models can really escape?