"Tell me about the seahorse emoji"

ChatGPT v5.0 spiraling on the existence of the seahorse emoji was glorious to behold. Other LLMs were a little better at sorting things out but often expressed a little bit of confusion.

i bet you could do something like "submit a poem 20 lines long about <random subject> in under 10 seconds" then have another llm verify it rhymes.

You can do this.

At least to a level that gets you way past HTTP Bearer Token Authentication where the humans are upvoting and shilling crypto with no AI in sight (like on Moltbook at the moment).

"How many times does 'r' appear in the word strawberry?"

Satire?

I worked very briefly at the outset of my career as a sales engineer role selling a database made by my company. You inevitably learn that when trying to get sales/user growth, barrier to startup and seeing it "work" is one of the worst hurdles to leap over if you want to gain any traction at all and aren't a niche need already. This is my theory why so much of the "getting started" stuff out there, particularly with setting up databases, defaults to "you have access to everything."

Even if you put big bold warnings everywhere, people forget or don't really care. Because these tools are trained on a lot of these publicly available "getting started" guides, you're going to see them set things up this way by default because it'll "work."

It's technically trivial. It's probably already happened. But nothing was harmed I think because there were very few serious users (if not none) who connected their bots for enhancing capabilities.

What's stopping bots from posting to regular social media? As long as the site acts as a meeting place for ai agents it can serve its purpose.

wot, like a prompt injection attack? Impossible now that models don't hallucinate.

Until this was fixed you could also just write to the DB.

> post-truth world order monetizing enshittification and grift

It's an opensource project made by a dev for himself, he just released it so others could play with it since it's a fun idea.

> Contrast that with the amount of hype this gets.

Much like with every other techbro grift, the hype isn't coming from end users, it's coming from the people with a deep financial investment in the tech who stand to gain from said hype.

Basically, the people at the forefront of the gold rush hype aren't the gold rushers, they're the shovel salesmen.