Top
Best
New

Posted by namanyayg 11 hours ago

AI is killing B2B SaaS(nmn.gl)
248 points | 403 commentspage 5
karmasimida 4 hours ago|
I think people here need to accept that software is becoming electricity, you get charged when you use it and by how much. You don't pay for a box shaped electricity or purple color electricity, it is just electricity.
ahmedhawas123 7 hours ago||
As a founder, there is another angle here that is worth mentioning. Not only does AI B2B SaaS allow insourcing, it also allows there to be 10x (imaginary number) the number of companies building SaaS for the same use case. What we see in healthcare or finance for example is executive fatigue from demos, in many cases mostly vibe coded frontend UIs that entrepreneurs are using to test the market. This creates friction for businesses / SaaS companies that are unable to show how their solution is unique, well built or has a clear moat over the many others they have seen.
brikym 6 hours ago|
Bang on. I mentioned this as well. Mature SaaS companies are also expanding into each others domains. Notion is now doing email for example.
CuriouslyC 7 hours ago||
AI isn't killing SaaS exactly, but instead of selling UIs, SaaS companies are going to have to focus on infrastructure and data. You have to host stuff somewhere, so there's an inescapable cost and transaction that has to take place. If businesses can pay one bill for infra + data management and get nice apps and stuff on top of that (without being locked in), that makes more sense than trying to roll stuff together even if you have a platform team.
brikym 6 hours ago||
I can see three forms of competition here:

- A company vibe codes their own app to replace a SaaS. Great when they only wanted a small chunk of the functionality. - Startups benefitting from AI coding are copying mature SaaS companies and competing on price. - Mature SaaS companies are branching out into each others domains. Notion is doing email. Canva is doing an office suite.

DaedalusII 6 hours ago||
there is no saas downturn caused by AI. wall street is just starting to say hang on a minute, why is this SaaS stock trading at a price to earnings ratio of 300?

then the sell-off is attributed to AI because it is far easier to say to shareholders hey we know our company lost half its value but thats actually a good thing because we need to pivot to AI and we're going to spend all our free cash flow on AI software and our stock should totally be trading at 300x earnings again in a few weeks. if you can last another few months as CEO and the fed cuts rates you'll be able to ride it out

of course, the tide is going out on a few dogs. I don't think adobe will become dominant again

you see the same trend with mass-layoffs being blamed on AI. easy way to sell bad news to the shareholders

in 2026, AI and JE are the two reasons for absolutely everything

exizt88 5 hours ago||
The reason for divergence is actually much simpler. NASDAQ 100 includes data center builders, Morgan Stanley software index doesn't. Stock market is going down across the board if you exclude data center construction.
spprashant 8 hours ago||
Saas companies will survive for the same reason they do today. The operational overhead of any sufficiently complicated piece of software is too much, even more so if it's vibe coded.
Hamuko 8 hours ago|
The bus factor is gonna be pretty high if your enterprise relies on an internal tool that some guy at your company vibe coded at some point.
falloutx 7 hours ago|||
Bus factor would be 0 because even he wont be able to debug it.
rvnx 7 hours ago|||
This was true pre-AI, but now, the bus factor is actually way lower in any software than it was before:

- Hey Claude, what is the project in XXXXX/ about and how does it work ? What should be improved there ?

pjmlp 11 hours ago||
Not sure about that, however agents in low code tools are certainly taking over old school integrations.
namanyayg 10 hours ago|
Nice, what kind of agents and integrations are you seeing being used?
pjmlp 10 hours ago||
Platforms like Boomi, Workato, Optimizely Opal,
jacobsenscott 5 hours ago||
Remember when businesses ran on cobbled together access databases and vb? It was easier than building something ny prompting an llm.I made a good living just rewriting those things for them when they fell apart.
sqircles 9 hours ago|
I would assume one major thing here is that many orgs only need a small subset of functionality from what most products provide. Many times, that small subset of functionality is only "good enough" in and of itself, but the org is paying the premium for the entire suite of whatever it is. This makes realizing that an LLM can get them to MVP and beyond much easier.

Charging hundreds of thousands if not millions per year for very basic functionality is what is "killing" b2b SaaS.

danielmarkbruce 5 hours ago|
There is also the benefit of being able to use a single database (and hence schema) across multiple "apps". In many cases the complexity arises from the fact that all these apps have their own databases.
More comments...