Top
Best
New

Posted by saubeidl 2 days ago

ICE Begins Buying 'Mega' Warehouse Detention Centers Across US(www.bloomberg.com)
69 points | 78 comments
shirro 2 days ago|
When they are full I wonder what the final solution will be?
davzie 2 days ago||
It's crazy watching so many Americans not see the parallels here.
beej71 1 day ago|||
It's been a long time and our memory only goes so far back. I'm not even that old, but the time between WWII and my birth is waaaaay less then my current age. Jimmy Doolittle was still hosting Christmas specials on TV when I was a kid. Nobody knows who TF that even is now. I doubt half of America has even heard of the Third Reich. Sure, they know that "Nazi" is some kind of insult, but the rest is history forgotten. The last educational film on the matter was Indiana Jones III.

Those of us who remember history will continue to fight, and our numbers aren't small. Maybe one day we can begin to repair the enormous national and global damage that has occurred.

pseudohadamard 1 day ago|||
It's pretty much the UN concentration-camp conspiracy theory that rightwing nutters have been pushing for decades, except that now it's their guys doing it so it's all OK.
JuniperMesos 2 days ago||
[flagged]
ZeroGravitas 1 day ago|||
Yes, that was the original plan the last time too.

https://www.theholocaustexplained.org/how-and-why/how/deport...

> As with most of the Nazis’ murderous actions, the deportation of German Jews was improvised and haphazard . The increased numbers of Jews arriving in the ghettos of eastern Europe led to severe overcrowding, unsustainable food shortages and poor sanitation. This, in combination with the slow progress in the German invasion of the Soviet Union, convinced the Nazis that a ‘solution’ to the ‘Jewish problem’ needed to be organised sooner than had been originally envisaged.

trvz 2 days ago||||
That was a rhetorical question.
lawn 2 days ago|||
Do you know what the "final solution" is?
threatofrain 1 day ago||
What is the probability that there shall not be a civil war or coup in the US within the next 10 years? What is the earliest signal to flee?
mothballed 1 day ago||
You could get a visa in someplace like UAE tomorrow if you incorporate a shell company. Why would you wait if your plan is to flee anyway? It will only get more difficult the longer you wait.

By the way most countries require an apostilled FBI background check, recent copy of birth certificate w/ updated apostille, apostilled other documents, etc for a resident visa and they all have to be done within 90 days of your visa . So by the time the government is dysfunctional you'll only be able to flee to places without functional immigration control like Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, central Africa, etc as there will simply be no way to get the needed documents.

Oh and as a side note, having fought, and later leaving a civil war. Most likely you will get out if you have enough intelligence or money to navigate the border but you'll be robbed of everything you have on the way out unless you're just incredibly lucky.

beej71 1 day ago||
Yes. Depending on the country and situation, these things can take a long time. We have ours in the works already and it's looking like 1-2 years to go through.
myvoiceismypass 1 day ago|||
I mean, we already had a self-coup on January 6, 2021 that failed. The next one likely won't fail.
AnimalMuppet 1 day ago|||
I may not be the best one to answer - I estimated 50% chance by last August. (I'm happy to be wrong.)

A civil war you can flee once the shooting starts. (Probably. Maybe not if you are male and of military age. And the region you're in may close the border for whatever reason.)

A coup is perhaps more likely to close the border, or at least to close it to "people like you" (if the side that doesn't like your kind is in charge). For that, I'd keep a close eye on this election, and up until the new Congress takes office, and maybe just after that. But if anything is going to happen, it will probably be before the new Congress is seated, because it's harder to create a veil of plausible grounds after that.

scarecrowbob 1 day ago||
As somebody who'd rather fight the fascists now, I don't think it's super likely.

Enjoy some wild speculation, if that's your jam:

My bet is that DJT will kick off from a stroke in the next 2 years, the GOP will get beat, and things will "go back to normal". But the Dems will elect some jerk like Newsome and not do the important work of imposing consequences, so this fascist power will return after two presidential terms of delicious brunch (which will fail to make progress on the environment, mass incarceration, immigration, student loan debt, housing, the economy, or anything, really).

AI and small drones will be -even- better at that point, along with an ever tighter network of flock cameras.

The propaganda will be even more solid and the aging/retired gen-xers whose grand kids won't talk to them will largely be interacting with AI-based pals who are making the same kind of pronouncements that Nome and Vance are currently making but in the voice of their first girlfriend from 1987.

Personally, I'd rather see some very extreme change now instead of fighting that fight in 15 years (or, rather, supporting the 30 year olds fighting, because I will be pretty old then).

It's not a very realistic picture of the future though; it could be the case that all this comes to a head soon. It could be the case that soon folks have some real come-to-jeebus moment about Epstein-types and capitalism (hey, it's not Capitalism, it's just croney internationalist capitalism that is the problem bro, we can just implement this anarcho-Reaganist platform, these aren't limitations on capitalists, just "normal Christian Democrat" reforms).

It might be the case that the real limits of 3-5K soldiers operating against an armed and organized city of 100k midwesterners makes it obvious what the outcomes will be if they don't stop pushing their hands.

For instance, when they start busting, say, signal chat groups of suburban soccer moms that have taken up sniping tires and cutting the power to facilities, folks might no longer have the stomach for the kinds of applications of power necessary to prevent the actions of "the people" who have their hands on all the little levers.

It could be the case that the global ecosystem really is as bad as it appears and giant storms break all the just-in-time delivery systems in the so-called advanced but fault-intolerant countries about the same time Ebola Plus (tm) hits, and we all go back to living in the beautiful caves in the pinion forests of my back yard (that's my preferred outcome even though it'll probably kill me).

Hell monkeys could fly out of my butt (that would probably kill me too, but I die in most scenarios I can imagine).

To answer your question, all things equal if you're gonna flee, flee. I'm not, but that's because I don't think there is anywhere to go.

j4coh 2 days ago||
Getting ready for the elections?
spwa4 1 day ago||
Why not call them what they are? Concentration camps.
iJohnDoe 1 day ago||
They’re concentration camps. What else do you call a place built to hold tens of thousands of people? Why do you need 75,000 beds if you’re not planning to cram people in?

Then what happens after they’re locked in there? Are they processed one by one? Do the math. Even with absurdly optimistic assumptions of one hour per person, eight hours a day, every single day. You’re still talking about more than a year to get through 75,000 people. And that assumes perfect efficiency, no delays, no shortages, no illness.

While all that’s happening, people will get sick, injured, desperate. People will die. And after someone is “processed,” where do they go? Immediately put on a plane and sent back to their home country? Is that realistically happening at scale?

This setup isn’t about processing people. It’s about warehousing them. And when large numbers of people are caged indefinitely under those conditions, deaths get written off as “suicides.”

mothballed 1 day ago||
I think there is a hesitation to downplay what the Jews experienced by using the same name, even if it accurate. Maybe some of the same things are happening but it's not the same as the Jewish experience in Germany.

Personally I have no issue with calling them concentration camps but it does feel there needs to be a word to distinguish them from the camps of the Holocaust.

gxnxcxcx 1 day ago|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentration_camp

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extermination_camp

beAbU 1 day ago||||
You are aware that it's not just the jews that were placed in concentration camps, right?
mothballed 1 day ago||
Yes of course. But like it or not, people think Holocaust as soon as you say concentration camps, even though the words are far more broad. That's why many of us are hesitant to say it.

There have been other words like this. For instance "negro" just means black but if you say it everyone assumes you are referring to slaves or slave-like individuals or referring to a black person as inferior.

spwa4 1 day ago|||
I don't want to imply those experiences compare.
defrost 2 days ago||
Measles Has Now Begun To Infect Immigrant Detention Camps

  It’s darkly funny, in a way, to recall a racist trope that gets trotted out about immigration all the time: immigrants bring disease into the country. That in itself isn’t funny, obviously. The funny part is that it seems like we’re proving the opposite to be true under the Trump administration. As the measles outbreak in America continues to rage, immigration detention camps are starting to feel the effects.

  ...

  It’s also worth remembering that the spread of disease is a recurring feature in the concentration camp industry. Deaths from disease as well. And, unlike the trope mentioned above, these are infections immigrants are getting from America, not bringing to her soil. 
~ https://www.techdirt.com/2026/02/04/measles-has-now-begun-to...
notachatbot123 2 days ago|
Nothing funny about people in custody being infected by diseases. It would be funny if the fascists would contract it from other fascists.
lawn 2 days ago||
Given the overlap of the fascists and antivaxers, it's likely they will spread it among themselves.
josefritzishere 1 day ago||
*concentration camps.
lawn 2 days ago||
Flagged because people would rather put their head in the sand than to admit what's occurring in front of their eyes.
lpcvoid 1 day ago||
Republicans want to put people in camps without pesky commentary. Nothing new here.
kreetx 1 day ago||
From what I've understood, Trump was elected to get illegals out. It also seems that the crime rate is actually going down.
Starman_Jones 1 day ago|||
Crime rate has been going down for 30 consecutive years (except during COVID). Immigrants (legal or otherwise) commit crimes at a lower rate than citizens. "It seems" is doing a lot of work in your comment.
kreetx 21 hours ago||
Would you say then that effect of deporting illegals is in fact slowing down the decline?
Starman_Jones 13 hours ago|||
I don't believe 2025 crime statistics have been released yet, it would take several years of data to conclusively establish a trend, and even if the data did show that, correlation does not equal causation. What does your heart tell you?
lawn 20 hours ago|||
The logical conclusion to draw is that it has no observable effect on the crime rate.
kreetx 17 hours ago||
There is no logical conclusion to draw, you measure this instead.
mindslight 1 day ago||||
Why hedge with "from what I've understood" if you're confident that you're actually talking about reality? Rather, it sounds more like a deliberate badge of ignorance.
kreetx 21 hours ago||
Why pick on the expression when you could point out that the opposite is true? If it is, do say.
mindslight 16 hours ago||
I did point out that your sentence is false (its framing would have to be honest for its opposite to be true), and also that your sentence structure indicates that you well know it.
kreetx 15 hours ago||
"Sounds like deliberate badge of ignorance" means that "crime rate is going up instead"?
mindslight 15 hours ago||
The last time I stuck with it and went around in circles with your low-effort leading comments, you eventually just dropped the conversation. Given that I pointed our your framing here is not-even-wrong and yet you're doubling down on it, I don't foresee continuing this exchange being any more productive.
donkeybeer 2 hours ago||
He's done this fucked in the head stupidity with me too, he says utterly random not-even-wrong things out of his ass and keeps mindlessly repeating them as if he didn't hear anything when asked to cite actual case law or statistics. He has literally no idea how American legal system works and makes up absurd crap like filming cops is illegal or makes up crap about ICE agents having "court orders". When I cornered him on this asking him how many were actual court orders and how many legally null internal ICE "Karen" warrants proving he has no fucking idea, he kept repeating his retardation in circles. He still doesn't seem to understand the idea that police cannot and is not granted any powers to decide what is illegal, that is a matter of the courts. He also cited some absurd crap about deportations reducing crime again showing he is making up absurd crap out of his ass, for in many studies immigrants are shown to commit less crimes so deportation would increase the per capita crime rate.
donkeybeer 1 day ago|||
Crime rate has shot up violently. It just isn't being recorded right now. But it will be in future and the perpetrators dealt with, including if necessary by hanging.
deafpolygon 2 days ago||
One of Hitlers first act was to convert a series of warehouses, unused factories, empty hotels into makeshift camps (“wild camps”) which would set the stage for the eventual concentration camp system. This happened almost immediately after the appointment of Hitler as chancellor. He hadn’t become the Fuhrer yet.
orwin 1 day ago||
To be specific, those warehouses were used to 'reform' political enemies for a few months (communists at first, then democrats and liberals). The point was visible torture, then letting the political opponent out and forbidding him to talk about what happened inside (despite leaving torture marks, removed nails etc).
aa-jv 1 day ago||
Hitler learned of this method from the British during the Boer wars. Americans are just improvising more modern variants.
deafpolygon 1 day ago||
Wow, I never thought I’d see people employ whataboutism with Hitler. Guess we are living in a new world now.
lawn 1 day ago|||
They're not just downplaying Hitler, they're cheering on the same development.

Musk's Nazi salute was a sign of the times to come.

deafpolygon 10 hours ago||
I just can’t understand it.
aa-jv 1 day ago|||
I mean, its common knowledge that he was inspired to construct concentration camps by the British and the Belgians doing exactly the same in their colonies.

He thought he would get away with it, because they were also doing it - the difference is, they did it way over the horizon, out of sight, whereas he did it in his own backyard for all the world to see.

Klaster_1 2 days ago||
Gulag.
saubeidl 2 days ago|
I think concentration camp is the more apt comparison.
kreetx 1 day ago|
[flagged]
beej71 1 day ago||
ELI5 how it makes my life better. Right now the blowback is making my life worse.
kreetx 1 day ago||
How does deportation of illegals make anything worse for non-illegals? AFAIU, crime rate goes down and wages go up (or stop going down), more taxpayer money to citizens, fairness in visa queues.
donkeybeer 1 day ago||
Do you have the statistics for the crime rates or did you again completely make up crap without knowing anything? Show the numbers or get out.
donkeybeer 1 day ago|||
You again seem very deeply confused. I think you are from one of the inferior countries where things like freedom of speech and rule of law don't quite exist. Nothing wrong with it, it's not a personal or moral failing. You just need to understand that "illegality" is something that needs determination in a court of law, not a random whim or statement of a Karen off the streets. Weren't you the one who completely made up some nonsense about "court orders" then kept on speaking completely irrelevant nonsense when it was pinned down that you had no idea about the topic, that you didn't even know the difference between a court order and a Karen warrant that has much less legal power, or what were the statistics of the both. You are again showing the same weird and complete utter nonsensical statements.

If you think random ICE karens's "statements" count, then I think you should have no problem accepting mine counts too. Let me declare kreetx is an illegal alien and a violent murderous pedophile. I hope you would not resist arrest. After all it has been declared so.

mothballed 1 day ago||
Law is the organization of state violence. You just have an antiquated view of the law, that no longer applies to reality.
donkeybeer 1 day ago||
I know we are living in Trumpian lawlessness but the person above seemed to be talking as if he actually believes this incoherent nonsense under normal interpretations too. He isn't even American btw, he has stated it himself.
mothballed 1 day ago||
The hilarious thing is they call it the "democrat" way.

Under democrat Biden, DHS jailed and detained me for 24 hours all while stating I was "not under arrest" and no probable cause that I had committed any crime. After they had finished, they retroactively got a warrant, to cover their ass, writing what was essentially 100% fabricated, claiming a completely (non-existent) unnamed dog told a completely unnamed officer that told yet another officer that I had drugs (thus impossible to ever cross-examine it in court the origin of their claim).

throwawayqqq11 1 day ago|||
What does democrat biden have to do with your anecdote?

EDIT: Your were lucky. Disappearance without judicative oversight is no outcome of regular law enforcement. Watch this: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zkgNnbTrsgw

mothballed 1 day ago||
It has to do with the fact that the "democrat" way is also to brutalize residents with no probable cause they've done anything wrong. I mean yeah if you brutalize 10 people instead of 1 person you're more brutal, but you're still a brutalizer either way, and scale is the difference between the two parties.
donkeybeer 1 day ago|||
Yeah American leo has hardly ever been a very "lawful" or sane entity, it's just that Trump enables them to a much more extreme level.
saubeidl 1 day ago|||
If you look closely, putting the Jews in camps will make the life of Germans better! you just need to consume other media channels.
kreetx 1 day ago||
If you look closely, Jews were citizens and an ethnic group. Jews also somehow weren't able protest along with the enemy while whistling.

An anti-Bloomberg headline might run like this: Bloomberg wants detention centers for illegals to be without a roof. I.e, of course the deportation process continues, real estate is needed.

donkeybeer 1 day ago|||
Protest along with the "enemy"? What "enemy"? You seem extremely confused to the point of not even making sense anymore.
kreetx 21 hours ago||
Well, the "enemy" of the protesters are the ICE officers. When drawing Nazi Germany comparisons I was pointing out that during those times people weren't whistling along German soldiers when they didn't agree to what they were doing.
donkeybeer 21 hours ago|||
Protest "along" is a strange word then. But the main question has always been prove illegality and come with actual legal warrants and don't commit terrorist acts on random civilians, if ICE were merely following the law the protests would have been much smaller.
kreetx 21 hours ago||
If the captured illegal is actually not in the country illegally, the should easily be able to get out of the situation by proving it.

The protesters are not protesting, they are interfering with a police operation. They could protest at town square, etc.

donkeybeer 21 hours ago||
They are not interfering, you still don't seem to understand filming or protesting cops or engaging in any other act of free speech in public does no require permission. Out of courtesy local govt may be informed but engagement in speech is not illegal. And again you fail to understand the problem is that ICE they aren't waiting for proof before killing or jailing people.

In fact in many cases they are engaging in home invasions which are clear cut illegal unless the real not karen warrant is presented. In fact Minnesota is a castle doctrine state, meaning if cornered on your own property you can quite legally shoot the invader including killing them. It's not just theoretical, it has already happened in many states.

kreetx 20 hours ago||
Following police along and whistling or filming the operation doesn't fall under free speech. E.g, the whistling is giving away to the person being captured that the police coming.

ICE has "proof" for an illegal, as otherwise they wouldn't know who they are capturing. If the alleged illegal has proof otherwise, they could produce that.

The "killings" were accidents, a woman attempted a police getaway (or a runover) and got shot while doing that. The other person had a gun while he was taken down. He was not using it and in fact the gun had been removed from him, then some gun went off after which the guy was shot dead. Neither of these events were pre-planned. My suggestion for protesters would be to not try to drive away form the cops, even less so to drive onto them, nor carry a gun to a protest, or if you do, don't enter any situation where you are to be detained.

donkeybeer 14 hours ago|||
If ICE are this deeply unfit to their job that fundamental exercise of free spech and the right to bear arms causes them to engage in paranoid violent psychoses then they are free to quit the job, nobody is forcing them or holding down their hands.
donkeybeer 14 hours ago||||
>ICE has "proof" for an illegal, as otherwise they wouldn't know who they are capturing.

Correct. They don't know. They are performing random home invasions and kidnappings without caring for who or what.

donkeybeer 15 hours ago|||
ICE proof doesn't count for shit unless they have a real warrant. Otherwise legally they are quite limited. You still haven't been able to establish how or why or case laws citing whistling at cops is illegal. You have very deep and fundamental misunderstanding of American law. Whatever country you are from has clearly messed eith your brain to the extent you can't even imagine countries with actual free speech existing. You still do not understand, whether someones an "illegal" or not is NOT for ice or any police force to establish, its for courts to establish. You also failed to respond how any thing at all gives ICE the permission to commit terrostic acts of vile violence against innocent civilian bystanders. You are even repeating the soundly disproven lie of the terrorist "cop" beung ran into. You have very clear, very fundamental psychotic delusional disorders where repeatedly explained extremely clear things do not enter your mind and you mindlessly keep repeating disproven things like a broken record and fail to ever cite any statistics or case law despite being repeatedly asked to.
donkeybeer 20 hours ago|||
What's the relevance of whistling? It's not clear if it's illegal, warning motorists about speed ticketing cops is legal for example.
saubeidl 1 day ago|||
Jews were not citizens. That's the oldest trick in the book, make up some dumb legalistic excuse for ones crimes against humanity.

Just gate citizenship to the lilliest of whites and then put non-citizens in camps...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Laws#Classifications...

kreetx 21 hours ago||
Jews were stripped of citizenship after 1933, so in fact they were. Quite similar to how citizens of US have European, African, etc. heritage but are still citizens.
saubeidl 20 hours ago||
The stripping of citizenship was implemented as prerequisite for the camps.

You need a plausible excuse for the camps after all, as I'm sure you're well aware.

kreetx 20 hours ago||
Sure. I'm simply saying that illegals in the US and German Jews aren't the same. The latter actually were citizens, most/many of them for more than one generation while the illegals in the US have recently entered. Also, US illegals are simply deported, not killed.

Also, acquiring real estate for any org to for any activity is also normal. E.g a town government who buys a warehouse to house a temporary school or hospital.

Bloomberg is just trying to insinuate analogies here because their political party didn't win.

AnimalMuppet 1 day ago||
1. The government has the right - and even the responsibility - to enforce the immigration laws.

2. The current administration is doing so far more violently and confrontationally than is needed.

Both are true. I can be in favor of enforcement of immigration laws and still be opposed to the way the administration is doing it.

JuniperMesos 1 day ago||
What would you have them do differently? There are a lot of people who have violated immigration laws in the US.
beej71 1 day ago||
I think you can invert GP's point #2 for that one.

Here's a start: end immunity and masks for ICE. This will naturally improve things.

But that's not all. You can also naturalize people who are being productive citizens.