It is also interesting to contrast calling them by name vs. the other example, “a major semiconductor company”, not called by name. Though of course, there are also different reasonable ways to interpret that.
Downside: your employees’ agents decide that they should collectively bargain.
Ok how about you tell us one thing this shit is actually doing instead of vague nonsense.
Because for many of us, AI is "not approved until legal say so".
> Enterprises are feeling the pressure to figure this out now, because the gap between early leaders and everyone else is growing fast.
> The question now isn’t whether AI will change how work gets done, but how quickly your organization can turn agents into a real advantage.
FOMO at its finnest. "Quick before you're left behind for good this time!"
The idea itself has sensibility. It is the kind of AI application I've been pitching to companies, though without going all in on agents. Though I think it would be foollish for any CEO to build this on top of OpenAi, instead of a self-hosted model, and also train the model for them. You're just externalizing your internal knowledge this way.