Top
Best
New

Posted by HellsMaddy 18 hours ago

Claude Opus 4.6(www.anthropic.com)
1977 points | 841 commentspage 7
kingstnap 18 hours ago|
I was hoping for a Sonnet as well but Opus 4.6 is great too!
paxys 17 hours ago||
Hmm all leaks had said this would be Claude 5. Wonder if it was a last minute demotion due to performance. Would explain the few days' delay as well.
trash_cat 17 hours ago||
I think the naming schemes are quite arbitrary at this point. Going to 5 would come with massive expectations that wouldn't meet reality.
mrandish 17 hours ago|||
After the negative reactions to GPT 5, we may see model versioning that asymptotically approaches the next whole number without ever reaching it. "New for 2030: Claude 4.9.2!"
esafak 9 hours ago||
Or approaching a magic number like e (Metafont) or π (TeX).
Squarex 17 hours ago|||
the standard used to be that major version means a new base model / full retrain... but now it is arbitrary i guess
cornedor 17 hours ago|||
Leaks were mentioning Sonnet 5 and I guess later (a combination of) Opus 4.6
scrollop 17 hours ago||
Sonnet 5 was mentioned initially.
sanufar 17 hours ago||
Works pretty nicely for research still, not seeing a substantial qualitative improvement over Opus 4.5.
zingar 16 hours ago||
Does this mean 4.5 will get cheaper / take longer to exhaust my pro plan tokens?
EcommerceFlow 17 hours ago||
Anecdotal, but it 1 shot fixed a UI bug that neither Opus 4.5/Codex 5.2-high could fix.
epolanski 15 hours ago|
+1, same experience, switched model as I've read the news thinking "let's try".

But it spent lots and lots of time thinking more than 4.5, did you had the same impression.

EcommerceFlow 15 hours ago||
I didn't compare to that level, just had it create a plan first then implemented it.
mannanj 17 hours ago||
Does anyone else think its unethical that large companies, Anthropic now include, just take and copy features that other developers or smaller companies work hard for and implement the intellectual property (whether or not patented) by them without attribution, compensation or otherwise credit for their work?

I know this is normalized culture for large corporate America and seems to be ok, I think its unethical, undignified and just wrong.

If you were in my room physically, built a lego block model of a beautiful home and then I just copied it and shared it with the world as my own invention, wouldn't you think "that guy's a thief and a fraud" but we normalize this kind of behavior in the software world. edit: I think even if we don't yet have a great way to stop it or address the underlying problems leading to this way of behavior, we ought to at least talk about it more and bring awareness to it that "hey that's stealing - I want it to change".

esafak 9 hours ago|
But they don't just take your code; they give you a model to code with.
jofla_net 9 hours ago||
chains, more like it...
swalsh 17 hours ago||
What I’d love is some small model specializing in reading long web pages, and extracting the key info. Search fills the context very quickly, but if a cheap subagent could extract the important bits that problem might be reduced.
danielbln 4 hours ago|
So send off haiku subtasks and have them come back with the results.
scirob 14 hours ago||
1M context window is a big bump very happy
small_model 17 hours ago|
I have the max subscription wondering if this gives access to the new 1M context, or is it just the API that gets it?
joshstrange 17 hours ago|
For now it's just API, but hopefully that's just their way of easing in and they open it up later.
small_model 16 hours ago||
Ok thanks, hopefully, its annoying to lose or have context compacted in the middle of a large coding session
More comments...