Top
Best
New

Posted by throwawaypm123 14 hours ago

Tell HN: I'm a PM at a big system of record SaaS. We're cooked

I found myself disagreeing with almost all of the comments on the “AI Is Killing B2B SaaS” thread [1], based on my perspective as a senior PM (~20 years in SaaS) at a massive system of record (SoR) company in California. We’re still cooked. Throwaway for obvious reasons.

BigCo SoRs, differences aside, have historically been a good, low-drama way to make a living in tech. RSUs, ~40-hour weeks, generally smart colleagues, and real problems to solve for F100 customers. Our products work, but are not loved. Enterprise sales runs the show.

I have no concerns about a scrappy AI startup or indie dev replacing us. The real threat is other SoR vendors, the cloud providers, and of course the AI labs themselves. All of them are coming for our SaaS margins, and as an industry we are woefully unprepared.

Every major SoR has its core competency (HR, ERP, CRM, etc.), but also a long tail of lesser-known portfolio products that increasingly overlap with other SoRs and serve as growth vectors. The competition here is only going to accelerate. As a huge enterprise, you’re not going to rip out a component your SoR for a cool startup or a vibe-coded internal tool... but you would seriously consider doing so if the alternative comes from another SoR vendor you use and is cheaper.

The public cloud providers are explicitly positioning themselves as the place where your business data, AI agents/LLMs, and critical applications live. This is on a direct collision course with SoRs’ own AI platform ambitions that they are banking on for growth.

The AI labs themselves have the same ambition. Note where systems of record sit in OpenAI’s Frontier press release marketecture: a dotted, nearly invisible line at the bottom [2].

SoRs aren’t dead, and they’re not being disrupted by vibe coders. But the path forward is brutal.

Which brings me to the hardest point that applies to me as well. SoR teams are not known for fast execution, cutting edge AI adoption, product taste, or engineering excellence. These are exactly the strengths of our new competitors. We also struggle to attract this kind of talent. People who fit that profile go to FAANG or the labs. We could try to compete with RSUs, but those are down ~50% over the past few months, and the industry is under increasing pressure from investors around stock-based comp and M&A in general.

The goal here is an honest take from someone on the inside. There’s a difficult road ahead. I think SoRs will always continue to exist in some form but I don’t think the recent market corrections are overblown.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46888441 [2] https://openai.com/index/introducing-openai-frontier/

96 points | 39 commentspage 2
vjerancrnjak 12 hours ago|
Most software is just middlemen collecting money. Thats the reason why there is no economic drastic growth even with 2-3 years of AI.

What you’re worrying about is just bigger middlemen.

If you were not a value extracting middleman there would be no fear of replacement, because you can always create more than what you take.

I’m glad if this causes a shift in the industry and we lose x analysts, x architects, x scientists, data engineers and all other formulaic middlemen that just live in a weird middlemen economy.

It is immense luck that we don’t have to actually produce something and we get paid but it is much better if we’re forced to actually do something that isn’t empty.

michaelpalmeter 10 hours ago||
You are under-estimating the power of AI tools to dynamically adapt to business needs and fully supplant all SaaS, even SoR vendors. The ERP database (e.g.) is safe. The rest of the app is on the table. It will happen faster than you think.
BSOhealth 12 hours ago||
I’m in the same boat. AI can gen better UI forms, and a database is a database is a database. Customers want MCP and API access to do their own thing on their own terms. Model co’s and folks like Palantir come in to “partner” but the writing is on the wall.

So what are we going to do about it? Genuinely up for a startup here.

ck_one 12 hours ago||
How do you think big labs will try to attack you guys? Why not just close the data to them?
saas_yall 12 hours ago||
SAAS was always dubious anyway, for every SAAS a companies team implements you end up with an "integration engineer" to bring the data back into a "data lake" from the "data silo" buying the SAAS caused - and then you just wonder "why didn't we just build this"? Then AI I made completing "20% happy path" so easy you ask "really why didn't we just build this - what's 2k more lines in our monolith between existing engineers"?

Used to take a few days, 90% was never that hard, now it takes half a day or so.

PLMUV9A4UP27D 12 hours ago||
I'm a top executive at a system of record SaaS company. I fail to understand the argumentation this post is trying to make. Language is too vague, problem description too general. Too many abbreviations.
oidar 12 hours ago||
>As a huge enterprise, you’re not going to rip out a component your SoR for a cool startup or a vibe-coded internal tool

If you are a huge enterprise, why not?

csours 12 hours ago||
Speaking as a huge enterprise, a SaaS SoR is useful BECAUSE all the components already work together, and I don't have to pay my own people to worry about maintenance or vulnerabilities.

Data egress and ingress are always possible, but then you have to manage authX (etc) in more than one place, more than two places, oops now it's 3, 4, 5 and now we got ransomware'd

patmcc 12 hours ago|||
Because as a huge enterprise you want stability and ability to check the boxes you need to check far more than anything else.

I'm at a medium enterprise and this is true. If I go with e.g. Atlassian I can get everything checked off, even if it's expensive and kinda dogshit. But I know they have a support system, I know they read CVEs and issue patch notes, I know I can find the info for audits and SOC2 cert and everything else.

Oh, some startup offers better software for a tenth the cost? Great. It'll be 30% more work for me to track down all that bullshit? Ok then, complete non-starter, I'll stick with Atlassian.

reactordev 12 hours ago||
Because of Conway’s Law…

There’s so much process that gets put around the tools. Headcount that’s justified. Etc.

unicorn_cowboy 12 hours ago||
SaaS is very much not my area of expertise, but this makes sense to me: https://x.com/DavidOndrej1/status/2019126831761572169

TLDR excerpt: - Top layer — the AI agent. The thing that actually executes the work. - Middle layer — the SaaS UI. The dashboards, the workflows, the buttons you click. - Bottom layer — systems of record. The databases, CRMs, and ERPs that store the real data.

Right now, value is getting sucked upward into the agent layer and downward into the data layer. Everything in the thin middle gets crushed.

Terretta 9 hours ago||
> the thing that actually executes the work^H^H^H^Htoil
kruipen 12 hours ago||
> but this makes sense to me: https://x.com/DavidOndrej1/status/2019126831761572169

AI slop.

unicorn_cowboy 12 hours ago||
Can you elaborate?
More comments...