Was it because ChatGPT helped you to write this post?

> She was worried about a friend who was travelling in a far-away city, with little timezone overlap when they could chat, but she could talk to ChatGPT anytime about what the city was like and what tourist activities her friend might be doing, which helped her feel connected. She liked the memory feature too, saying it was like talking to a person who was living there.

This seems rather sad. Is this really what AI is for?

And we do not need gigawatts and gigawatts for this use case anyway. A small local model or batched inference of a small model should do just fine.

Could you please provide information about the efficiency optimization you plan to implement?

Saving the planet and the Trump alliance (https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/867947/o...) don't seem to relaly jive.

> save the planet

> I'd been missing that human connection

At OpenAI.

Brendan can do whatever he wants. Hes that good. If anybody seriously needed to interview him 20+ times to figure it out, then the burden is now on them to not fuck it up.

> "I'm an Intel fellow, I work on datacenter performance." Silence

Seems like that really hurt.

Man I don't care if you are best engineer in the planet but reading that post made me cringe. Keep your ego under control, please.

Performance and efficiency are important, but we need you to invent the monitoring tools and visualisations that will underpin alignment!

> it's not just about saving costs – it's about saving the planet.

You're in for a surprise buddy.

Apparently, there's this guy who's really good at optimizing computer performance and makes a lot of money doing it. At the same time, he writes mediocre school essays that are actually a bit embarrassing. Guys, if you have the opportunity to land a very well-paid job, then do it. Take the money. Live your life. But please spare us the public self-castration.