Did the article intentionally start with a LLM cliche to filter out all the people who hate reading obviously generated content? I would say it worked.
laluser 6 hours ago||
I have been attempting to write a lot more with AI, but it's so gimmicky. It's always spitting lines like this: " it's not just about x – it's about y." like in this post. I find it so frustrating that no matter the prompt I throw at it, it eventually repeats itself again after some time. Good technical and succinct writing is almost impossible to iterate on with AI for me.
estearum 2 hours ago|||
I spend a lot of time on LinkedIn due to job and I have an actual physical gag reflex at this point now from the "it's not X, it's Y" pattern.
I didn't know it was possible for a sentence structure to cause such a thing.
icepush 2 hours ago||
It's not the sentence structure—it's the lack of sincerity
xnxnxkx 5 hours ago|||
[flagged]
mawadev 5 hours ago|||
I like how my eyes went over the first sentence, barely parsing it and already discarding the information, because its obviously ai generated. Its like the circumstances we live in added a new layer of perception to my brain to guard itself against the flood of useless information!
Nasrudith 4 hours ago||
It isn't AI generated it is just plain a vacuous cliche. Seriously what is with people who think 'they can always tell it is AI' when really AI is living rent free in their head and they fixate on anything they don't like and are oh so convinced it must be the AI they hate. They're exactly like Fundamentalists and the devil. Or Communists and how they think capitalism literally intentionally created everything as harmful as possible just to spite them.
estearum 2 hours ago||
wat
raincole 5 hours ago|||
I really hope it's intentional. The author is a smart, accomplished person. He even published books. It's sad if this kind of person thinks it's okay to just outsource their writing to AI.
gritspants 2 hours ago|||
Reads like a love letter to his new employer. Hopefully it earns him points there. I admire his work and will just pretend I never read this.
dvfjsdhgfv 3 hours ago|||
[flagged]
jofzar 6 hours ago||
[flagged]
I_am_tiberius 12 hours ago||
If it's in your power, make sure user prompts and llm responses are never read, never analyzed and never used for training - not anonymized, not derived, not at all.
surajrmal 12 hours ago||
No single person other than Sam Altman can stop them from using anonymized interactions for training and metrics. At least in the consumer tiers.
satvikpendem 11 hours ago||
It's a little too late for that, all the models train on prompts and responses.
dforsythe 12 hours ago||
[flagged]
falloutx 3 hours ago||
TLDR +$$$
rvz 12 hours ago||
[flagged]
patrickaljord 12 hours ago||
Unless OpenAI goes with a very liberal definition of AGI, he's going to wait decades for AGI.
Insanity 11 hours ago||
They’re already trying to redefine the AGI playing field by doing so.
thefounder 11 hours ago||
I think OpenAI will IPO at 1T. I don’t want to say bubble but it could be one of these stocks super hyped that never goes anywhere after the IPO(I.e airbnb during Covid)
Kina 8 hours ago||
I believe that OpenAI wants to IPO at that valuation. I don’t think it can IPO.