Why are they obscuring the price? It must be outrageously expensive.

open ai naming is a meme at this point

Been using glm 4.7 for this with opencode. Works really well.

I stopped using OpenAI tools recently after they increased the censorship. I can't even tell it to read a screencapture software I am building because it thinks I might use it for evil purposes.

Does anyone want this? Speed has never been the problem for me, in fact, higher latency means less work for me as a replaceable corporate employee. What I need is the most intelligence possible; I don't care if I have to wait a day for an answer if the answer is perfect. Small code edits, like they are presented as the use case here, I can do much better myself than trying to explain to some AI what exactly I want done.

For a bit, waiting for LLMs was like waiting for code to compile: https://xkcd.com/303/

> more than 1000 tokens per second

Perhaps, no more?

(Not to mention, if you're waiting for one LLM, sometimes it makes sense to multi-table. I think Boris from Anthropic says he runs 5 CC instances in his terminal and another 5-10 in his browser on CC web.)

Anyway token eaters are upgrading their consumption capabilities.

128k context window!

Normal codex it self is sub par compared to opus. This might be even worse