Top
Best
New

Posted by panic 23 hours ago

I love the work of the ArchWiki maintainers(k7r.eu)
865 points | 157 commentspage 2
fodkodrasz 14 hours ago|
I just hope they have robust backups and disaster-recovery plans, as Gentoo Wiki once had a terrible data loss, and it was like the burning of the Alexandria Library, I feel that put the distro to a decline. I don't use Arch (I used Gentoo in those times), but these collaborative knowledge bases are too precious to be lost.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44900319

myself248 9 hours ago||
I download the Kiwix copy of the Arch wiki every year or two, as my offline source of linux knowledge in case I find myself offline for some reason.
redox99 12 hours ago||
Wouldn't everything be on the internet archive? And common crawl?
aeroevan 10 hours ago||
Being on the internet archive and being able to pick up from a restored backup are two very different things
redox99 5 hours ago||
It's a wiki. Maybe you lose the edit history and stuff like that, but the actual content which is what matters should be very easy to recreate from those sources.
agoodusername63 5 hours ago||
I am not exaggerating slightly when I say that arch wiki taught me how to use Linux

I’ve always been dabbling in Linux since 2007 but I never really felt productive in it until i discovered arch. And it’s outstanding wiki

agumonkey 14 hours ago||
I'm still somehow surprised at the implicit culture quality (concise, precise, extensive) of that wiki, because it seems there was no strictly enforced rules on how to create it. Similar-minded people recognized the quality and flocked to make it grow.
duesabati 11 hours ago|
I can see that too, this might be a reason for its success, all the articles are very straightforward and full of paths you may encounter
gucci-on-fleek 22 hours ago||
I don't even use Arch, but I agree that their Wiki is awesome. Unless my problem is super obscure (and sometimes even then), I can nearly always find an answer there. But the best part is that it seems to be never incorrect, unlike essentially every other result in Google.
dietr1ch 22 hours ago||
I don't use Arch anymore, yet I still find myself reading their wiki from time to time. It's a phenomenal resource.
canadiantim 20 hours ago|
What are you using now?
dietr1ch 19 hours ago||
NixOS. Having a config-defined system is a bit too different at first, but really nice when it comes to system reproducibility, and being able to roll back.

It made maintaining my laptop + workstations the "same" a breeze, although it took a bit to learn and settle into something that works for me. It seems today things are easier for newcomers, but Nix Flakes are still "experimental", and thus the documentation on things might seem confusing or misleading sometimes.

etyhhgfff 10 hours ago||
Nix Flakes are around for years and still experimental?
dietr1ch 9 hours ago|||
Yup. I wish they graduate soon, they have been great for a long while. I'm not sure what's blocking them today.

I just use them like they are stable and will deal with any breakages later. I doubt any breakage will be too bad and that it'd even affect me.

colordrops 6 hours ago|||
The word experimental has no meaning here anymore. I forgot the last time that someone brought that up.
elcdodedocle 8 hours ago||
I agree. It reads like a cook book rather than a dictionary of tech specs. No spam getting in in the way of getting things running and getting things right; If you need details you can go to individual package docs from maintainers and project docs from devs, no need for misaligned redundancy. It is also pretty comprehensive, or at least I have not missed anything yet. And up to date. So, in my opinion, the best distro documentation I know of. And I like their community process too: The most trustworthy and reliable I have seen so far without a big corporation backing it up, except for maybe Debian. Let's keep the donations going, these good people deserve it!
its-kostya 4 hours ago||
I really admire the maintainers' discipline with respects to grooming quality edits and fostering a welcoming environment. Incredibly patient folks in the interactions I've had.
hrtk 8 hours ago||
Arch wiki is one of the reasons I stick to Arch as my daily driver
nathanmcrae 19 hours ago||
Aside, but it's pretty neat that the author has been semi-regularly posting on their blog for over 20 years.
rurban 16 hours ago|
Neat? I would use other words. Fraudsters rely on marketing. https://danielpocock.com/en/matthias-fsfe-analogous-identity...
kryptiskt 13 hours ago||
That guy has a history of harassment in Debian, and is not a credible source.
enoeht 19 hours ago|
gentoo forums & wiki initially were the goto place until it was deleted.
VorpalWay 16 hours ago||
I used Gentoo back in the day and the wiki was good, I even contributed to it at times. Eventually I switched distro (didn't want to spend all my time compiling), and a few years later I went to look at the wiki and it had become much worse.

Do you know what the story was there, what happened? Why was it deleted?

czernobog 15 hours ago||
It was? Did they bring it back because I do see stuff on their forums..

I do prefer gentoo wiki over arch wiki from time to time as things feel less cluttered to me but that's just my opinion.

More comments...