Looks good and like the lightweight aspect. As always, what do I have to do get tabs that look like tabs? What do people have against tabs that look like tabs, instead of buttons?
The "preview" and "code" buttons in the components break the "alt+arrow" bindings to go back to the previous page. Instead it just alternates between "preview" and "code".
anton-107 10 hours ago||
Why do all the UI component libraries always feature an accordion (something i can build myself in 5 minutes and very rarely need), but always omit a date picker / calendar component (something that is needed almost in every corporate web form and really requires a lot of effort to build)?
anton-107 10 hours ago|
I must appoligize - it is there, hidden under "Form elements" in the left menu. Kudos to the authors!
speedgoose 10 hours ago||
Isn't it the one from the web browser? An <input type="datetime-local" />
That one is highly inconsistent, on some platforms its useless. For instance on Chrome/linux entering historic dates via the datepicker takes minutes to slowly scroll through the years. Always build your own datepicker, you know better what UX pattern will best suit your application and your users.
nkmnz 9 hours ago||
I know that guy from listmonk! I always thought the frontend could use some love and planned to spend a couple of days on contributing a couple of ideas, but I never came around. Now I know why things are as they are :)
This is of special interest to me, because man do I hate UI frameworks with tons of external dependencies. Looking at you, Bootstrap.
mxuribe 4 hours ago|
I used to think bootstrap was bloated too...and then i had heard - now, i don't know if its true - that bootstrap was originally intended *ONLY* as an internal prototype building tool, and any bloat did not matter...because expected audience, usage would be totally fine for a bloated framework...When i heard, i gave boostrap more of a pass...but, then again, i stopped using it, and began using other, lighter weight frameworks...and nowadays, i so rarely touch any web stuff...and when i do its only for me so then use zero frameworks, and merely display whatever default the browser shows with zero CSS, javascript...then again, my private web page needs are so basic anyway.
elseleigh 5 hours ago||
This is a very nice library. At a first reading it seems complete (but did I see summary/detail - I don't remember). Bookmarked for further investigation. Congratulations and thank you.
rohitpaulk 14 hours ago||
Surprised that none of the comments here are comparing this to Bootstrap.
weiliddat 14 hours ago||
Yeah reminds me of early Bootstrap
JCattheATM 11 hours ago||
Wouldn't a comparison to Bulma be more apt?
kitd 15 hours ago|
Great work! PicoCSS feels a bit too minimalist at times. This looks like a better balance of lightweight and functional.