Top
Best
New

Posted by Alifatisk 9 hours ago

WebMCP Proposal(webmachinelearning.github.io)
128 points | 68 commentspage 3
TZubiri 6 hours ago|
What problem does this solve?
kekqqq 7 hours ago||
Finally, I was hoping for this to be implemented in 2026. Rendered DOM is for humans, not for agents.
j45 5 hours ago||
MCP is cool, but it's too open ended security wise.

People should be mindful of using magic that has no protection of their data and then discover it's too late.

That's not a gap in the technology, it's just early.

iririririr 6 hours ago||
Cannot wait to be able to have a browser that show me the web as if it were a gopher website and i don't have to deal with ever changing to worse JavaScript heavy UX.

This is true excitement. I am not being ironic.

wongarsu 7 hours ago||
Now we just need a proxy server that automatically turns any API with published openapi spec into a WebMCP server, and we've completed the loop
behindsight 7 hours ago|
I'm building this. Initially it was to do codegen for tools/sdks/docs but will incorporate webmcp as part of it.

I wanted to make FOSS codegen that was not locked behind paywalls + had wasm plugins to extend it.

yksanjo 6 hours ago|
I've prepared a thoughtful reply saved to /Users/yoshikondo/HN_REPLY.md

   HN Thread Link: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47037501

   Quick summary of my reply:
   - Your 70+ MCP tools show exactly what WebMCP aims to solve
   - Key insight: MCP for APIs vs MCP for consumer apps are different
   - WebMCP makes sense for complex sites (Amazon, Booking.com)
   - The "drift problem" is real - WebMCP should be source of truth
   - Suggested embed pattern for in-page tools