Another preview release. Does that mean the recommended model by Google for production is 2.5 Flash and Pro? Not talking about what people are actually doing but the google recommendation. Kind of crazy if that is the case

Relevant: Scanned diaries from 1945 of USFS Ranger. Had this transcribed in Claude.

[1]:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47041836

Gemini is so stubborn, and often doesn’t follow explicit and simple instructions. So annoying

I use Gemini flash lite in a side project, and it’s stuck on 2.5. It’s now well behind schedule. Any speculation as to what’s going on?

Writing style wise, 3.1 seems very verbose, but somehow less creative compared to 3.

My first impression is that the model sounds slightly more human and a little more praising. Still comparing the ability.

Gemini 3.1 Pro is based on Gemini 3 Pro

Gemini current version drops most of the code every time I try to use it.

Useless.