Top
Best
New

Posted by LorenDB 7 hours ago

Keep Android Open(f-droid.org)
921 points | 364 commentspage 3
RosaIsela 4 hours ago|
https://archive.is/https://f-droid.org/2026/02/20/twif.html
306bobby 2 hours ago||
Looks like I'm staying in my custom ROM lol
Seattle3503 4 hours ago||
Should device manufacturers be worried about this direction? Could they eventually be locked out too?
cadamsdotcom 4 hours ago||
What would it take for Linux phones to gain the ability to run Android apps?
dvh 6 hours ago||
EU should fork Android
qiine 3 hours ago||
The number one problem is locked hardware
b00ty4breakfast 7 hours ago||
The Control Society is way lamer than I could have imagined. Deleuze! I demand a refund!
fredgrott 6 hours ago||
What people forget is that the real monopoly is in how the AOSP hardware OEM contract is written....

Remember how hard Amazon had it to attempt an Android fork?

I was due to OEM SOC access being locked out due to those contracts....

Any open source mobile OS attempting to complete with AOSP needs access to mobile OEM soc providers not touched by AOSP contracts and currently that is somewhat hard.

martin-t 4 hours ago||
Crazy idea: when companies change their product, they have to change the name.

Do you ever feel like the same food item doesn't taste the same it did 10 years ago? Maybe it's your memory being faulty or maybe the company got new management which decided to cut costs while keeping prices, extract the differential value from customer inertia and move on when the product stops being profitable.

Android is the same. Certain freedoms were a part of the offering - a part of the brand name. They no longer are. Not only should lose their trademark[0], they should be legally forced to change the name.

[0]: The purpose of which is to identify genuine product from counterfeits - in this case, the counterfeit just happens to be by the same company which released the original product.

zb3 7 hours ago|
Android was never open. User apps are limited, only system apps can do X which means third party apps can't compete with Google and this is not a coincidence.

Let's focus on making it possible to use really open Linux systems on smartphones.

gf000 7 hours ago|
There are some functionality limited to google play services, but it really is not too much in my opinion.
vsviridov 7 hours ago|||
The amount of open stuff that was migrated into the Play Services closed source blob over the years just keeps growing.
tadfisher 5 hours ago||
I still can't comprehend why they implemented FIDO/WebAuthn support in Play Services. Passkeys are extremely difficult to support in apps that don't depend on Play Services client libraries.
zb3 6 hours ago|||
I'm not sure what you're referring to, but I was talking about the whole permissions system where the user is a third class citizen. Device manufacturers are second class citizens (restricted by Google via CDD/CTS) and the only true winner on that system is Google.

Regarding some concrete examples - Google can deeply integrate Gemini, but a competitor can't do this and users get no final say here either. Competitors are restricted by the permission system, Google is not restricted at all.

While rooting can alleviate this to some extent, Play Integrity is there to make sure the user regrets that decision to break free..

More comments...