Top
Best
New

Posted by ColinWright 1 day ago

I verified my LinkedIn identity. Here's what I handed over(thelocalstack.eu)
1299 points | 448 commentspage 9
jihadjihad 1 day ago|
> The legal basis? Not consent.

> The reason? US surveillance laws […]

This slop in every blog post? Fucking tiresome.

JohnMakin 23 hours ago||
I was randomly forced to do this about a year ago, gave them everything except a passport (Tried providing other doc but support is either bots or overseas), got rejected, and lost a 15 year old legitimate business account.

Could never find any explanation why I was targeted by this - it said it detected “suspicious activity” but I only ever interacted with recruiters, and only occasionally. Supposedly it is deleted after if you don’t go all the way through, but I do not believe it. This data ends up in very weird places and they can go fuck themselves for it afaic.

hajix007 15 hours ago||
Good to know, ty!
ozim 1 day ago||
I verified my account and I handed over the same info as I handed over when I was getting MSFT Azure cert exam.

So it was nothing special for me.

port11 22 hours ago|
“I handed over a lot of personal information to my bank, so every website wanting the same level of access is nothing special to me.”
ozim 22 hours ago||
No point is, it is the same company handling data with exactly the same process.

They do it for all MSFT related stuff I guess.

port11 21 hours ago||
Sure, but a subsidiary has their own Terms, Privacy Policy, list of sub-processors, etc.
trinsic2 17 hours ago||
If you are using Linked in for anything at this point, you are just asking for trouble. They have no interest in maintaining a healthy business ecosystem and you can see that with the way they try to close you into their system and the amount of AI slop that is on that platform.
dvfjsdhgfv 1 day ago||
Since some job offers require a linked in link, I maintain an empty page explaining why maintaining a LI account is a privacy and security hole. It turns out it works.
prox 1 day ago|
Did you need to verify your account first?
dvfjsdhgfv 22 hours ago||
No, and it's difficult for me to understand why anyone would ever want that.
nalekberov 1 day ago||
You can verify yourself using company email address - maybe I am being naive to think that it’s much safer, but it’s way better than handing over your ID data.

I never understand why people supply too much info about themselves for small gains.

People at LinkedIn wants you to believe that your career is safe if you play by their games, but ironically they are one of the main reasons why companies nowadays are comfortable with hiring and firing fast.

andreashaerter 1 day ago|
> You can verify yourself using company email address

LinkedIn does not support smaller companies; it appears to rely on some kind of whitelist or known-enterprise system. This option is simply not available for at least 90% of users.

nalekberov 1 day ago||
> LinkedIn does not support smaller companies.

Pity, but even then is it worth to hand over your very personal data to multiple companies for the sake of blue tick? Not judging, genuine question.

heliumtera 15 hours ago||
You have you identity away but at least you have a blue checkmark! It could be a purple checkmark, thing about that!
jarek-foksa 1 day ago||
LinkedIn support will also blatantly lie to you when you ask them whether Persona is GDPR compliant and needed to activate your account.

Last year I was trying to setup a business LinkedIn page for SEO purposes, which meant I also had to create a personal account. After being told several times that I absolutely need to scan my ID card with that dodgy app I simply replied that I can't do it due to security concerns. After several weeks they unlocked my account anyway, but I suspect this would not happen if algorithms determined that I actually needed that account to find a job and pay my bills.

veltas 22 hours ago|
Persona just got hacked so we're off to a good start.
More comments...