Posted by petewarden 10 hours ago
> This code, apart from the source in core/third-party, is licensed under the MIT License, see LICENSE in this repository.
> The English-language models are also released under the MIT License. Models for other languages are released under the Moonshine Community License, which is a non-commercial license.
> The code in core/third-party is licensed according to the terms of the open source projects it originates from, with details in a LICENSE file in each subfolder.
Presuming (I haven't checked myself) the git author information supports this, it should be fine to treat this as licensing the code it specifies under MIT; based on that license name being (to my understanding) unambiguous and license application being based on contract law and contract law basically having at it's very core the principle of "meeting of the minds" along with wilful infringement being really really hard to even argue for if the only thing that's separating it from being 100% clearly licensed in all proper ways being not copying in an MIT `LICENSE` template with date and author name pasted into it.
The English-language models are also released under the MIT License. Models for other languages are released under the Moonshine Community License, which is a non-commercial license.
The code in core/third-party is licensed according to the terms of the open source projects it originates from, with details in a LICENSE file in each subfolder."
Timestamp 1: 2026-02-25T00:31:28 1771979488 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47145661
Timestamp 2: 2026-02-25T00:32:03 1771979523 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47145666
Two detailed large comments in two different threads in a 35 second span from a new account.